Share this comment
Fenton may not be wrong, but Steve Kirsch very likely is wrong.
Specifically, Steve's analysis looks wrong in "Problem #5: Chile and Korea PROVE it is the vaccinated who are dying"
"we are getting a huge 30% excess mortality rate" -> A 30% increase in the mortality rate can be a very small number depending on the base mortality rate. Say …
Fenton may not be wrong, but Steve Kirsch very likely is wrong.
Specifically, Steve's analysis looks wrong in "Problem #5: Chile and Korea PROVE it is the vaccinated who are dying"
"we are getting a huge 30% excess mortality rate" -> A 30% increase in the mortality rate can be a very small number depending on the base mortality rate. Say the base mortality rate was 1%. A 100% increase would drive mortality to 2%. Since 2% < 10%, it is conceivable that the entire increased mortality is driven by the unvaccinated.
The only thing that can be killing the unvaccinated more exclusively and increasing the mortality rate by 30% is COVID and/or mRNA vaxx/spike shedding. Our Uber lords say that both are not happening, thanks to the "safe and effective" "vaxxines".
But what do I know, there is a study out there that "shows" that the unvaccinated are more likely to be involved in car crashes. Irresponsible rascals, all of them.
That study is interesting. The unvaccinated may very well be more likely to be involved in car crashes because
- poorer people are less likely to be vaccinated than richer people
- those same people are more likely to drive because they are more likely to either have a job which involves driving, or at least have a job which requires their physical presence and therefore driving to work - whereas the richer folks just turned on their PCs and stayed at home.
The fly in the ointment is that a record of vaccination status isn't being established for each death that has increased the death rate. Many of the "sudden deaths" don't include any information of vax status.
I agree. The chart shown in "Problem 5" is worrisome, but it doesn't prove anything.
The chart does not include every country in the world, and who's "included" and "excluded" on the chart makes all the difference. The graph does NOT prove anything. In an attempt to understand graphs like this, it is not unheard of to exclude the most extreme outliers. Exclude CHL, KOR, BGR, and SVK from the graph, and the remaining countries present a muddled mess that does not support this level of certainty.
A more prudent approach by someone with no skin in the game would be to NOT discount these four outliers entirely, but attempt to account for just what it was that made each country so different from all the others. Perhaps we might learn something.
Thank you. Your line of reasoning just proved that SK's line of reasoning is correct.
But if the unjabbed are dying more than the jabbed, other countries on the list should have more excess deaths than Chile or South Korea, because the other countries have a higher percentage of unjabbed than Chile or Korea. Bulgaria and Romania should have especially high excess mortality, instead they’re among the lowest.
That's entirely irrelevant to the argument that Steve is making, which is "If we are getting a huge 30% excess mortality rate, there are simply too few people in the unvaccinated group to make this plausible."
It’s relevant.
According to the CIA data mortality rates of Chile and Korea are consistent with other countries' used in the comparison. See for yourself: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/death-rate/country-comparison/
The CIA is heavily involved in this plandemic. So, not a credible, trustworthy source of data.
You trust the CIA???
Your logic is illogical
Pray tell me how. Don't let this mystery hang.