The full study results were obtained via a FOIA request because Pfizer and the health authorities won't voluntarily disclose it. You're about to find out why.
The matching is supposed to reduce or eliminate bias between test and control for externalities like demos and so on. The thing is when I have built matching models they didn’t work as well as I had hoped. It’s harder than it sounds. Cheers and thank you Steve.
Have you excluded the possibility, pointed out by Steigstra, Fenton and others re data sets for "unvaccinated", that this category includes people whose vaccination was "too long ago" or "too recently"? The basis being that the effectiveness against infection "wanes"; and also that the vaccination takes 2 - 3 weeks "to start providing protection".
Anyone with half a brain and some integrity would know that this is completely wrong for assessing vaccine HARMS, which occur any time from immediately, to any time later in life.
I do not believe that there is any "control group" that has been recruited from people who voluntarily wished to NEVER be vaccinated, even though there would have been no lack of them. I would like to be corrected about this if it is wrong - no-one on any forum has ever pushed back on this claim of mine.
I believe the official "experts" are constructing their "unvaccinated" control groups in a way that completely breaches all the statistically honest requirements for a control group. I believe these data sets are being cobbled together well after the fact, working backwards from medical records relating to people who have needed treatment of some kind. NO effort has ever been made to have recruited people from some year zero start point to unearth the "unrecognized unvaccinated" who have never come into the data because they have never required treatment of any kind and are extremely healthy. There is a "healthy unvaccinated" class as well as a "healthy vaccinee" class; the problem is the latter is in the data and the former isn't. The latter is in the data BECAUSE "being vaxxed" created a record for them. But again, even a significant proportion of these may be shunted conveniently into the "unvaccinated" category BECAUSE they suffered an adverse event but it was "too early after vax to count" or "too long after vax to count". A REAL control group of NEVER vaccinated people would prevent this kind of manipulation. By the way, one of the ways those who DIE "too soon after vaccination" never make it into the vaccinated category, is that their vaccination is not even registered - at least in some countries. Their demise is registered and they are removed from the very data set the vaccination registration takes place in at a few weeks delay.
I presume you are long since aware of these possibilities and your posting is based on data you know to be statistically honest.
I am asking for nothing more than an opinion Steve. I am (as you might know) an Australian, and there is a sizeable group here that are "loudly" proclaiming that "the white hats are in full control". I personally think this is a foolish, possibly dangerous statement and I ask for an opinion from you as to :- "do you think the white hats (the good guys) are in control, or do you feel the same as I do that we are still deep in "schtuck" and until Donald Trump takes control it will remain the same". They are claiming that due to Biden extending the State of Emergency it PROVES (their word) that The White Hats are in Full Control. I would appreciate just a word from you.
Question. Did Pfizer count as unvaccinated those that had been jabbed with the Covid gene altering toxin, in their initial two weeks post jab ? If you remember they were not classed as vaccinated until two weeks post jab because of course the acute little adverse reactions like death spike in those first few hours and days ?!?
It’s still hard for me to understand how so many doctors and scientists could just turn a blind eye and take part in what was done to the world’s population(and are still doing so)knowing the harm that was being caused by these “vaccines”. It’s taken from me my trust in people in general and the admiration and trust in doctors and the medical profession as a whole and I will likely die before my time as a result.God bless the few who have tried to worn us even when doing so caused them great harm and loss to themselves.The world has become a much worse place and I don’t believe any of this is over.Evil people are still working towards their goals …what ever they are
I know. It's horrible. I, too, couldn't believe that people were like this. Because it's not JUST the doctors and others in the medical field. It's people from ALL walks of life being deliberately blind about this!
And yes, you are right: the world is a worse place than it used to be. I think it is multi-faceted and not just related to covid however. Society is changing, not for the better, and the people within it are being scooped up for the ride.
The biggest eye-opener for me from covid was not covering up data (drug companies have been doing that forever). It wasn't the medical profession making people have certain treatments (remdesivir etc) and stopping them from having others (IVM etc) - that's been going on for ages. It wasn't the governments of the world getting on side with Big Pharma (they've also been doing that for ages). No, it was the SOCIAL EXPERIMENT. I hadn't realised how much humans are HERD animals. After 14 years treating patients, when covid first hit the MSM, I thought I Knew People. How wrong I was!!!! In my lifetime, covid has been the biggest social experiment I have seen. I am now humbled, and know a lot more about People, and don't think I could ever again say I "know" People. I know a lot more. But certainly not everything.
People will lie, cheat, steal, rearrange their morals, ignore logic, abandon 'loved ones', suddenly be able to not do science (even if their whole life WAS science before this), suddenly agree to completely loopy ideas (wear 3 masks!) etc etc ALL so they 'fit in' with the Herd.
The Herd trumps EVERYTHING for most People. And that's what you need to understand about People. We're no different to a herd of zebras. It's all about 'fitting in'. The social accords are so ridiculously strong that to go against them is practically a social crime! When you do understand this, so much of human history will make sense to you!!! :-)
Your newfound understanding won't make People any nicer. It won't make the future any brighter or the past less horrendous. It won't change anything, actually, except your personal understanding of how other humans function (in this world). About the best it will do is (eventually) put your mind at ease because you can at least understand why humans do as humans do: because they can't help it. They're WIRED to do this! It's inbuilt for at least 99% of people!
Even if you start now, it will take you YEARS to come to this understanding. You may even come to realise that most people are a little mad. And I mean that. They've almost all got (at least) a few screws loose. It's just how it is. Most people aren't logical upstairs. And you actually need emotion to invoke logic, so you can see how things can go pear-shaped very quickly!
Hopefully this will help you - and others reading this - as you embark on your future.
And yes, I too may also die earlier than I would've without medical 'intervention' because I now avoid all medicos, as much as possible (my trust for them is in the negative department!). But I have levelled with myself and am OK with that outcome. Plus there are heaps of preventative/natural things I can do, anyway. At least I'm living life on MY terms now, as much as possible. And that feels really good, Randy :-)
Say no to this agenda. Howard Zinn on civil disobedience :
“Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders…and millions have been killed because of this obedience…Our problem is that people are obedient allover the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves… (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.”
Matt Damon from Howard Zinn's speech: The Problem is Civil Obedience
Hi Steve, Could I encourage your readers to take a look at https:www.thegmocase.info/ its really an eye opener and backs up what you have been writing.
if they are so smart and rich why did they get deadly bioweapon jabs! a college degree isn't going to save your dumb a$$! spiritual wisdom isn't taught in school!
Doesn’t make sense that the unvaccinated are in general “far less healthy,” since by and large they made studied choices regarding the safety of the jabs. It can be assumed that the health choices they make are given the same due diligence.
It does make sense to me because there are 2 groups of unvaccinated. Those who, as you say, made a studied choice to avoid the jabs (and they may well be the healthiest among us), but also, those who were too sick or otherwise without the wherewithal (and therefore probably also sick) to get vaccinated. (I would assume that would cover much of the homeless population, terminal alcoholics, and etc. for example.)
One of the things that just amazed me with the jabs roll out was that, so it seemed, everyone suddenly forgot that you're not supposed to vaccinate the sick.
You make a good point when it comes to these shots. My guess is that worldwide, at least in 2021, the trend for these shots generally followed the trend for other shots: healthier and wealthier people are more likely to get them. These trends probably drown out the fact there were numbers of health-conscious, well-read people who were skeptical and wary enough not to get them.
The matching is supposed to reduce or eliminate bias between test and control for externalities like demos and so on. The thing is when I have built matching models they didn’t work as well as I had hoped. It’s harder than it sounds. Cheers and thank you Steve.
Game over when RFK jr comes to town.
We should hope and pray for this, but I wouldn't take anything for granted.
Have you excluded the possibility, pointed out by Steigstra, Fenton and others re data sets for "unvaccinated", that this category includes people whose vaccination was "too long ago" or "too recently"? The basis being that the effectiveness against infection "wanes"; and also that the vaccination takes 2 - 3 weeks "to start providing protection".
Anyone with half a brain and some integrity would know that this is completely wrong for assessing vaccine HARMS, which occur any time from immediately, to any time later in life.
I do not believe that there is any "control group" that has been recruited from people who voluntarily wished to NEVER be vaccinated, even though there would have been no lack of them. I would like to be corrected about this if it is wrong - no-one on any forum has ever pushed back on this claim of mine.
I believe the official "experts" are constructing their "unvaccinated" control groups in a way that completely breaches all the statistically honest requirements for a control group. I believe these data sets are being cobbled together well after the fact, working backwards from medical records relating to people who have needed treatment of some kind. NO effort has ever been made to have recruited people from some year zero start point to unearth the "unrecognized unvaccinated" who have never come into the data because they have never required treatment of any kind and are extremely healthy. There is a "healthy unvaccinated" class as well as a "healthy vaccinee" class; the problem is the latter is in the data and the former isn't. The latter is in the data BECAUSE "being vaxxed" created a record for them. But again, even a significant proportion of these may be shunted conveniently into the "unvaccinated" category BECAUSE they suffered an adverse event but it was "too early after vax to count" or "too long after vax to count". A REAL control group of NEVER vaccinated people would prevent this kind of manipulation. By the way, one of the ways those who DIE "too soon after vaccination" never make it into the vaccinated category, is that their vaccination is not even registered - at least in some countries. Their demise is registered and they are removed from the very data set the vaccination registration takes place in at a few weeks delay.
I presume you are long since aware of these possibilities and your posting is based on data you know to be statistically honest.
I am asking for nothing more than an opinion Steve. I am (as you might know) an Australian, and there is a sizeable group here that are "loudly" proclaiming that "the white hats are in full control". I personally think this is a foolish, possibly dangerous statement and I ask for an opinion from you as to :- "do you think the white hats (the good guys) are in control, or do you feel the same as I do that we are still deep in "schtuck" and until Donald Trump takes control it will remain the same". They are claiming that due to Biden extending the State of Emergency it PROVES (their word) that The White Hats are in Full Control. I would appreciate just a word from you.
Question. Did Pfizer count as unvaccinated those that had been jabbed with the Covid gene altering toxin, in their initial two weeks post jab ? If you remember they were not classed as vaccinated until two weeks post jab because of course the acute little adverse reactions like death spike in those first few hours and days ?!?
Good point!!
It’s still hard for me to understand how so many doctors and scientists could just turn a blind eye and take part in what was done to the world’s population(and are still doing so)knowing the harm that was being caused by these “vaccines”. It’s taken from me my trust in people in general and the admiration and trust in doctors and the medical profession as a whole and I will likely die before my time as a result.God bless the few who have tried to worn us even when doing so caused them great harm and loss to themselves.The world has become a much worse place and I don’t believe any of this is over.Evil people are still working towards their goals …what ever they are
I know. It's horrible. I, too, couldn't believe that people were like this. Because it's not JUST the doctors and others in the medical field. It's people from ALL walks of life being deliberately blind about this!
And yes, you are right: the world is a worse place than it used to be. I think it is multi-faceted and not just related to covid however. Society is changing, not for the better, and the people within it are being scooped up for the ride.
The biggest eye-opener for me from covid was not covering up data (drug companies have been doing that forever). It wasn't the medical profession making people have certain treatments (remdesivir etc) and stopping them from having others (IVM etc) - that's been going on for ages. It wasn't the governments of the world getting on side with Big Pharma (they've also been doing that for ages). No, it was the SOCIAL EXPERIMENT. I hadn't realised how much humans are HERD animals. After 14 years treating patients, when covid first hit the MSM, I thought I Knew People. How wrong I was!!!! In my lifetime, covid has been the biggest social experiment I have seen. I am now humbled, and know a lot more about People, and don't think I could ever again say I "know" People. I know a lot more. But certainly not everything.
People will lie, cheat, steal, rearrange their morals, ignore logic, abandon 'loved ones', suddenly be able to not do science (even if their whole life WAS science before this), suddenly agree to completely loopy ideas (wear 3 masks!) etc etc ALL so they 'fit in' with the Herd.
The Herd trumps EVERYTHING for most People. And that's what you need to understand about People. We're no different to a herd of zebras. It's all about 'fitting in'. The social accords are so ridiculously strong that to go against them is practically a social crime! When you do understand this, so much of human history will make sense to you!!! :-)
Your newfound understanding won't make People any nicer. It won't make the future any brighter or the past less horrendous. It won't change anything, actually, except your personal understanding of how other humans function (in this world). About the best it will do is (eventually) put your mind at ease because you can at least understand why humans do as humans do: because they can't help it. They're WIRED to do this! It's inbuilt for at least 99% of people!
Even if you start now, it will take you YEARS to come to this understanding. You may even come to realise that most people are a little mad. And I mean that. They've almost all got (at least) a few screws loose. It's just how it is. Most people aren't logical upstairs. And you actually need emotion to invoke logic, so you can see how things can go pear-shaped very quickly!
Hopefully this will help you - and others reading this - as you embark on your future.
And yes, I too may also die earlier than I would've without medical 'intervention' because I now avoid all medicos, as much as possible (my trust for them is in the negative department!). But I have levelled with myself and am OK with that outcome. Plus there are heaps of preventative/natural things I can do, anyway. At least I'm living life on MY terms now, as much as possible. And that feels really good, Randy :-)
Say no to this agenda. Howard Zinn on civil disobedience :
“Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders…and millions have been killed because of this obedience…Our problem is that people are obedient allover the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves… (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.”
Matt Damon from Howard Zinn's speech: The Problem is Civil Obedience
https://youtu.be/S2li9E_94MA
Thank you for publicizing this, Steve.
Hi Steve, Could I encourage your readers to take a look at https:www.thegmocase.info/ its really an eye opener and backs up what you have been writing.
Keep up the good work.
if they are so smart and rich why did they get deadly bioweapon jabs! a college degree isn't going to save your dumb a$$! spiritual wisdom isn't taught in school!
Gotta protect those drug companies, otherwise we'd all be sick and die!
Doesn’t make sense that the unvaccinated are in general “far less healthy,” since by and large they made studied choices regarding the safety of the jabs. It can be assumed that the health choices they make are given the same due diligence.
It does make sense to me because there are 2 groups of unvaccinated. Those who, as you say, made a studied choice to avoid the jabs (and they may well be the healthiest among us), but also, those who were too sick or otherwise without the wherewithal (and therefore probably also sick) to get vaccinated. (I would assume that would cover much of the homeless population, terminal alcoholics, and etc. for example.)
One of the things that just amazed me with the jabs roll out was that, so it seemed, everyone suddenly forgot that you're not supposed to vaccinate the sick.
You make a good point when it comes to these shots. My guess is that worldwide, at least in 2021, the trend for these shots generally followed the trend for other shots: healthier and wealthier people are more likely to get them. These trends probably drown out the fact there were numbers of health-conscious, well-read people who were skeptical and wary enough not to get them.
So, Biden has extended their liability protection till 2030, but will a pardon stick given the level of fraud?
Not fraud, see Sasha Latypova.
It's those pharma advertising dollars is why they won't report it.
PROSECUTE FAUCI
Wait.
You mean vaxxed/unvaxxed ratios for AE were all greater than 1.0 by a mile?
That is absolute directionality that says it all without any need for commentary.