No wonder they have to mandate it. Their own data shows it doesn't work. A vaccine is supposed to reduce your chance of getting infected. So these are not vaccines.
Steve, I know you examine raw data. I see the Pfizer court ordered documents for March 1, 2022, have been released. I imagine this document would be of interest to examine, but you'd have to get a utility to convert it from PDF to Word, then you can accept corrections, to see it in a form that is readable.
It was the situation in Israel as well, and still is to an extant. I say to an extant, because they quickly changed the PCR testing policies, to dampen the signal.
It was unbelievably clumsy mind you, you could literally see the effect in real time - and it was a rather significant one - kind of showing in a precise way just how much they can play with the numbers by arbitrarily changing the testing policies in different populations.
I mean you could see it easily with your own eyes when you looked at the graphs, it was/is so blatant! oh well, it was months ago, time to get hyped for WW3™ .. and then for the all nu new variant™ I guess...
I just wanted to add an annoying addendum to my earlier post.
I recently lost my beloved 14yr old Rottie X (not the pic) and have started to look for another pooch in my life. I've had 4 dogs in my adult life - 2 Rotties and 2 X's. Smart as hell. Understood everything I said. Protective. Affectionate. My one dog saved my sanity after the wife died. I know all of them would have acted the same way so ....
I start looking for another rescue Rottie or Rottie X. Guess what? NO PROOF of dbl VAX and the shelters won't even respond on the application. I've asked precisely WHAT has my VAX status have to do with adopting a dog from a shelter. So far not even a response.
Like the horrific actions of the abusive cops putting down the "nazis and homophobes" in their trucks it is amazing and disgusting what little people will stoop to when they are handed some POWER and are only too happy to slide those gestapo storm trooper boots on. Whether it is beating on old people (rifle butts, horses etc etc) or the emotional abuse of denying a dog to a good loving home for the horrific crime of not being fully vax'd!!!
I'm (almost) ashamed to admit it but slowly I'm beginning to wish the WURST (sic) case scenarios of Steve's predictions for the short and long term adverse reactions to these experimental vax's actually come true!! Forgive me LORD but some - many - people are just too stupid or mean to live!!!
If you listen to Dr. Robert Malone and Steve I know you do, but also CEO and former VP DR. Yeadon of Pfizer, they came out an said that 2 shots offer NO IMMUNITY and that the vaccinated can still spread and carry virus, thus it is not and has NEVER been a VACCINE! In fact Pfizers own 6 month data study showed that the vaccine actually DID MORE HARM than GOOD!!! Pfizers OWN DATA!!!! Germany now calls this virus a Pandemic of VACCINATED, because they are spreading it and getting it! If it were such a good therapeutic why would our OWN CDC have to call the labs and tell them to STOP REPORTING positive covid in the VACCINATED!!!! I know I have said this over and over but people YOU HAVE TO START LISTENING!!!!
Yup. And TV dinner experts from infectious disease doctors, epidemiologists, politicians and other hacks from academic and hospital institutions continue to peddle this sick joke as if it's the only solution and way out. At least, this is the script Canada is sticking to. Our politicians still sit and debate in masks on. I see none of this anywhere in the West anymore. We're so slow it's embarrassing,
Outrageous how they're willing to fracture the civil order in this way. We have to a) stop listening to the media and the experts who continue to pimp the Covid narrative and b) remove health officials like Walensky (and Tam here) IMMEDIATELY.
It's important to know whether the 100000 in that "per 100000" denominator is population wide or within-group. To be fair, if it's the former thing (which admittedly is maybe a weird way for the Ontario govt to choose to report the data), then this data isn't pointing toward negative efficacy or inefficacy, because Ontario is something like 80% vaccinated I believe. If it's the latter thing, then it's certainly suggestive. It does matter in this case which it is. I've been closely watching the makeup of hospitalized and ICU cases by vaccination status in Ontario recently (link below) and it tends to be around 75% vaccinated in hospital, indicating very slight risk reduction in an 80% vaccinated population, but only about 50% vaccinated in ICU, indicating naively a more significant risk reduction of around 75% or a 4-fold relative risk ratio (50/20 * 80/50). I say naively because of course there are many likely confounders - the ICU patients may be disproportionately from a population too frail to withstand vaccination and hence already at high risk, inflating the unvaccinated numbers (though there are a limited number of such people). On the other hand the vaccinated population skews older so the vaccinated numbers could be inflated relative to the unvaccinated numbers on account of the higher baseline risk level in that population compared to the unvaccinated population.
I want to introduce Steve and his readers to a Canadian investigator who has been easily a year ahead of the curve in warning people about this medical cabal and the dangers of the shots. This video series, Medical Mafia, has something for everyone, highly recommended:
PS - I notice the link to the "Ontario, Canada public health website" is now not showing the graph, and says "Due to technical difficulties, the case rate by vaccination status by age group is not available".
If you click on "Case numbers and spread" on the LHS you will see the graph. They always have that message there... probably because people will see it and not take a look around the site. It is bad up here. Random people in the grocery store, that I have never met before, try to school me on mask wearing.
Early in the Scam-Demic, a Dr. still in his scrubs, accosted me in a grocery store and he felt compelled to get RIGHT UP in MY FACE about my Lack of a mask.
He scolded me for NOT Following The Science.
Well, when I got over the initial shock of his AGGRESSION, I chased him down and demanded He answer some questions for me ...
poor little $oyboy got challenged on his "$cientism" and did NOT like it at ALL!
He refused to answer my questions and ran away to hide, with me Following close behind and my voice rising several decibels with every unanswered question.
Later he kept averting his eyes and trying to pretend I wasn't there, but never answered ONE of my questions. I laughed him out of the store and tried to find him in the parking lot, to see if he would answer me in private where he didn't have to Publicly admit he was wrong, but he HIGHTAILED it out of there!
Made me quite angry about how Self Righteous and AGGRESSIVE he was - until he got challenged.
Oh, but it does work - just not the way they sold it to the masses. In 2020 I was perplexed by an addition to the local station's corporate (Hearst) EEOC statement. Included in the "we do not discriminate" list of traits was "genetic information." I have been ever since struggling to answer WITW? I had settled on transgenders. Now I have my answer thanks to Chile's admission to their law: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/25/a-law-to-protect-genetically-modified-humans/
A team of Bill-Gates linked research scientists have announced they are developing a needle-less vaccine that spreads itself like a virus, meaning people will “catch” the vaccine like they would a cold or flu, without the need for needles and injections.
Let me translate this for you:
Bill Gates works on a genetic Virus that targets specific genetic Groups and spreads throughout the population.
He is targeting specific genetic groups to eliminate them.
I've been thinking about that one. A vaccine that spreads like a virus...is a virus. In other words, they want to release a genetically modified disease? Sounds like COVID.
Hmmmm.... when I went to the website and looked by age categories, it actually showed less cases in those vaccinated for each age group. So it actually looks like the vaccines do work and there are less cases. Now... I'm not sure there aren't many other confounding variables.... but just wanted to share this, see if i'm missing something... if we want to be found credible, we have to make sure we are looking at the data correctly, because any error we make, will dismiss us completely, such are the times we live in.
Please do remember that they changed the official Cycle Threhold Cojbt from 40-45, BEFORE the "vaccines" were available to 25-27 AFTER they were released into the wild.
Not that the #'$ would be different or anything ... when they initially used a Tc high enough to GUARENTEE FALSE positives; then, in order to skew the #'$ favorably to both the narrative AND BIG pHARMa, they drop the Tc to 25-27.
I made a similar comment above, noting the reported makeup of hospitalized cases. It's important that we know what the 100k denominator represents here- whole population, or within-group? And there are several potential confounders in my view, not least of which is the likely higher age skew in the vaccinated population.
Yes, there is a serious inconsistency in their data. How can every age group seen individually have a higher rate for unvaxxed than vaxxed but the "all ages" category shows the opposite?
"The approved vaccines are all effective at preventing an individual from acquiring COVID-19 ..."
They make the same mistake in other places as well. I have told them repeatedly over the past half year that this is incorrect but they leave it up anyways. Here is part of what I told them 6 months ago:
The misrepresentations that I listed as appearing on the CU “Vaccine Information” webpage at https://carleton.ca/covid19/health-and-safety/covid-19-vaccines/ are unfortunately still there with no corrections at all. Here are the misleading statements and my comments from over a month ago to Dr. Bacon:
The webpage says:
“The COVID-19 vaccines have been rigorously tested during their development and carefully reviewed by Health Canada experts.”
That is not actually true. I understand that, in contrast to the normal four stage testing that vaccines usually undergo, the COVID-19 injections (I understand that they are not, strictly speaking, a ‘vaccine’ in the normal sense of the word) only went through 2 stages, omitting the animal testing stage, for example.
The webpage also asserts: “Only vaccines that are proven to be safe, effective and of high quality are authorized for use in Canada.”
This is true, for normal vaccines, but the drug manufacturers have so little faith in the safety of their COVID-19 injections that they sought, and were granted by the government, an amnesty against liability for problematic side effects of the injections. This hardly inspires confidence in the injections and I can certainly understand the reluctance of many educated people to take what is in effect, still an experimental injection.
The CU page continues: “Vaccines are proven to significantly reduce the chance of contracting, spreading, and suffering severe symptoms of COVID-19.”
That is not really known to be true either as the injection was, I understand, not created to “reduce the chance of contracting, spreading” the disease, but instead was designed to reduce suffering IF a person contracted the disease.
This is the root lie of the jabs. People cannot afford to deal with reality, as they seized civil liberties based on a lie. They will cling to this lie until they are dead.
Steve, I know you examine raw data. I see the Pfizer court ordered documents for March 1, 2022, have been released. I imagine this document would be of interest to examine, but you'd have to get a utility to convert it from PDF to Word, then you can accept corrections, to see it in a form that is readable.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_c4591001-T-S-final-reacto-tables-track.pdf
This document was obtained perusing and examining a host of documents dumped on this date from Pfizer. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Many such cases...
It was the situation in Israel as well, and still is to an extant. I say to an extant, because they quickly changed the PCR testing policies, to dampen the signal.
It was unbelievably clumsy mind you, you could literally see the effect in real time - and it was a rather significant one - kind of showing in a precise way just how much they can play with the numbers by arbitrarily changing the testing policies in different populations.
I mean you could see it easily with your own eyes when you looked at the graphs, it was/is so blatant! oh well, it was months ago, time to get hyped for WW3™ .. and then for the all nu new variant™ I guess...
I just wanted to add an annoying addendum to my earlier post.
I recently lost my beloved 14yr old Rottie X (not the pic) and have started to look for another pooch in my life. I've had 4 dogs in my adult life - 2 Rotties and 2 X's. Smart as hell. Understood everything I said. Protective. Affectionate. My one dog saved my sanity after the wife died. I know all of them would have acted the same way so ....
I start looking for another rescue Rottie or Rottie X. Guess what? NO PROOF of dbl VAX and the shelters won't even respond on the application. I've asked precisely WHAT has my VAX status have to do with adopting a dog from a shelter. So far not even a response.
Like the horrific actions of the abusive cops putting down the "nazis and homophobes" in their trucks it is amazing and disgusting what little people will stoop to when they are handed some POWER and are only too happy to slide those gestapo storm trooper boots on. Whether it is beating on old people (rifle butts, horses etc etc) or the emotional abuse of denying a dog to a good loving home for the horrific crime of not being fully vax'd!!!
I'm (almost) ashamed to admit it but slowly I'm beginning to wish the WURST (sic) case scenarios of Steve's predictions for the short and long term adverse reactions to these experimental vax's actually come true!! Forgive me LORD but some - many - people are just too stupid or mean to live!!!
Hey Bro, sooo sorry about your dogs / they Truly are mans best friends!
Still miss my Siberian Mutt-ski mix😲😬🤭🥲🥲🥲
And SADLY, ya still CAN'T FIX STUPID! 😬🤪🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
It would be wonderful if Karma really was a bitch.
Not for everyone, as too many were lied to and coerced into getting jabbed.
But for those who sneer and belittle and use their little Hitler mentality to demean others, then I hope it bites them hard enough to cause scars.
&/or Painful Reminders that they acted like absolute NAZI'$
If you listen to Dr. Robert Malone and Steve I know you do, but also CEO and former VP DR. Yeadon of Pfizer, they came out an said that 2 shots offer NO IMMUNITY and that the vaccinated can still spread and carry virus, thus it is not and has NEVER been a VACCINE! In fact Pfizers own 6 month data study showed that the vaccine actually DID MORE HARM than GOOD!!! Pfizers OWN DATA!!!! Germany now calls this virus a Pandemic of VACCINATED, because they are spreading it and getting it! If it were such a good therapeutic why would our OWN CDC have to call the labs and tell them to STOP REPORTING positive covid in the VACCINATED!!!! I know I have said this over and over but people YOU HAVE TO START LISTENING!!!!
'Scientific fraud': Drs. Robert Malone, Ryan Cole react to CDC hiding data
https://www.wnd.com/2022/02/scientific-fraud-drs-robert-malone-ryan-cole-react-cdc-hiding-data/
Hey, DV Scott -?
did you hear that ... ???
Got Answers, smartypants?
Enquiring minds .....
Yup. And TV dinner experts from infectious disease doctors, epidemiologists, politicians and other hacks from academic and hospital institutions continue to peddle this sick joke as if it's the only solution and way out. At least, this is the script Canada is sticking to. Our politicians still sit and debate in masks on. I see none of this anywhere in the West anymore. We're so slow it's embarrassing,
Outrageous how they're willing to fracture the civil order in this way. We have to a) stop listening to the media and the experts who continue to pimp the Covid narrative and b) remove health officials like Walensky (and Tam here) IMMEDIATELY.
It's important to know whether the 100000 in that "per 100000" denominator is population wide or within-group. To be fair, if it's the former thing (which admittedly is maybe a weird way for the Ontario govt to choose to report the data), then this data isn't pointing toward negative efficacy or inefficacy, because Ontario is something like 80% vaccinated I believe. If it's the latter thing, then it's certainly suggestive. It does matter in this case which it is. I've been closely watching the makeup of hospitalized and ICU cases by vaccination status in Ontario recently (link below) and it tends to be around 75% vaccinated in hospital, indicating very slight risk reduction in an 80% vaccinated population, but only about 50% vaccinated in ICU, indicating naively a more significant risk reduction of around 75% or a 4-fold relative risk ratio (50/20 * 80/50). I say naively because of course there are many likely confounders - the ICU patients may be disproportionately from a population too frail to withstand vaccination and hence already at high risk, inflating the unvaccinated numbers (though there are a limited number of such people). On the other hand the vaccinated population skews older so the vaccinated numbers could be inflated relative to the unvaccinated numbers on account of the higher baseline risk level in that population compared to the unvaccinated population.
https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/hospitalizations
Just have a closer look into ISRAEL'S #'$ .... Shocking!
Or Germany'$
Or Austria'$
Or almost every other country.
The scariest part is the VAERS data.
I want to introduce Steve and his readers to a Canadian investigator who has been easily a year ahead of the curve in warning people about this medical cabal and the dangers of the shots. This video series, Medical Mafia, has something for everyone, highly recommended:
https://amazingpolly.net/medical-mafia.html
I believe she is in reality Corey Lynn
And yes she’s terrific. I’ve been following her for almost 2 years now.
PS - I notice the link to the "Ontario, Canada public health website" is now not showing the graph, and says "Due to technical difficulties, the case rate by vaccination status by age group is not available".
LOL. These people are really frightened of truth.
If you click on "Case numbers and spread" on the LHS you will see the graph. They always have that message there... probably because people will see it and not take a look around the site. It is bad up here. Random people in the grocery store, that I have never met before, try to school me on mask wearing.
Early in the Scam-Demic, a Dr. still in his scrubs, accosted me in a grocery store and he felt compelled to get RIGHT UP in MY FACE about my Lack of a mask.
He scolded me for NOT Following The Science.
Well, when I got over the initial shock of his AGGRESSION, I chased him down and demanded He answer some questions for me ...
poor little $oyboy got challenged on his "$cientism" and did NOT like it at ALL!
He refused to answer my questions and ran away to hide, with me Following close behind and my voice rising several decibels with every unanswered question.
Later he kept averting his eyes and trying to pretend I wasn't there, but never answered ONE of my questions. I laughed him out of the store and tried to find him in the parking lot, to see if he would answer me in private where he didn't have to Publicly admit he was wrong, but he HIGHTAILED it out of there!
Made me quite angry about how Self Righteous and AGGRESSIVE he was - until he got challenged.
smh, $oyboys
"So in Ontario, they know these are not vaccines. What did they do? They tell people where they can get vaccinated."
Expecting western indoctrinated humans to be sensible is like expecting squirrels to write computer programs.
OH! .... is THAT how they messed up the income tax "reform" so badly?!?!? ...
DAMN THEM SQUIRRELS, who told THEM they could sling code without an attention span longer than an eicosanoid's half-life?!?!?
Here's something I don't completely buy into -- because I don't believe in the whole idea of germ theory-- but you may find some of it enlightening:
Dr. Raymond Obomsawin gives historical context and timelines of vaccine inefficiency and catastrophe:
https://odysee.com/video_2022-02-27_12-15-36:21deae96a4f59c7a8202ad55f4af5542bce58c73
Oh, but it does work - just not the way they sold it to the masses. In 2020 I was perplexed by an addition to the local station's corporate (Hearst) EEOC statement. Included in the "we do not discriminate" list of traits was "genetic information." I have been ever since struggling to answer WITW? I had settled on transgenders. Now I have my answer thanks to Chile's admission to their law: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/25/a-law-to-protect-genetically-modified-humans/
and this: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/27/mrna-incorporates-into-dna-in-six-hours/
"Someone" knew, for some time, this mRNA concoction was never a "vaccine."
A team of Bill-Gates linked research scientists have announced they are developing a needle-less vaccine that spreads itself like a virus, meaning people will “catch” the vaccine like they would a cold or flu, without the need for needles and injections.
Let me translate this for you:
Bill Gates works on a genetic Virus that targets specific genetic Groups and spreads throughout the population.
He is targeting specific genetic groups to eliminate them.
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/follow-the-cops-back-home-do-you?utm_source=url
It still can’t be as dangerous if it’s not injected at least. But when it replicates it’s technically in every way a virus.
I've been thinking about that one. A vaccine that spreads like a virus...is a virus. In other words, they want to release a genetically modified disease? Sounds like COVID.
lol check this out
All I am getting is
"Due to technical difficulties, the case rate by vaccination status by age group is not available"
Classic
Hmmmm.... when I went to the website and looked by age categories, it actually showed less cases in those vaccinated for each age group. So it actually looks like the vaccines do work and there are less cases. Now... I'm not sure there aren't many other confounding variables.... but just wanted to share this, see if i'm missing something... if we want to be found credible, we have to make sure we are looking at the data correctly, because any error we make, will dismiss us completely, such are the times we live in.
Please do remember that they changed the official Cycle Threhold Cojbt from 40-45, BEFORE the "vaccines" were available to 25-27 AFTER they were released into the wild.
Not that the #'$ would be different or anything ... when they initially used a Tc high enough to GUARENTEE FALSE positives; then, in order to skew the #'$ favorably to both the narrative AND BIG pHARMa, they drop the Tc to 25-27.
There's Liars
Damned Liars
...
And
Statisticians ...
I made a similar comment above, noting the reported makeup of hospitalized cases. It's important that we know what the 100k denominator represents here- whole population, or within-group? And there are several potential confounders in my view, not least of which is the likely higher age skew in the vaccinated population.
Yes, there is a serious inconsistency in their data. How can every age group seen individually have a higher rate for unvaxxed than vaxxed but the "all ages" category shows the opposite?
I had heard that about the iodine nose spray. I had forgotten. Think it was Dr. MCCullough? Sounds good. Thanks
Carleton University says on the website https://carleton.ca/covid19/cuscreen/education/:
"The approved vaccines are all effective at preventing an individual from acquiring COVID-19 ..."
They make the same mistake in other places as well. I have told them repeatedly over the past half year that this is incorrect but they leave it up anyways. Here is part of what I told them 6 months ago:
The misrepresentations that I listed as appearing on the CU “Vaccine Information” webpage at https://carleton.ca/covid19/health-and-safety/covid-19-vaccines/ are unfortunately still there with no corrections at all. Here are the misleading statements and my comments from over a month ago to Dr. Bacon:
The webpage says:
“The COVID-19 vaccines have been rigorously tested during their development and carefully reviewed by Health Canada experts.”
That is not actually true. I understand that, in contrast to the normal four stage testing that vaccines usually undergo, the COVID-19 injections (I understand that they are not, strictly speaking, a ‘vaccine’ in the normal sense of the word) only went through 2 stages, omitting the animal testing stage, for example.
The webpage also asserts: “Only vaccines that are proven to be safe, effective and of high quality are authorized for use in Canada.”
This is true, for normal vaccines, but the drug manufacturers have so little faith in the safety of their COVID-19 injections that they sought, and were granted by the government, an amnesty against liability for problematic side effects of the injections. This hardly inspires confidence in the injections and I can certainly understand the reluctance of many educated people to take what is in effect, still an experimental injection.
The CU page continues: “Vaccines are proven to significantly reduce the chance of contracting, spreading, and suffering severe symptoms of COVID-19.”
That is not really known to be true either as the injection was, I understand, not created to “reduce the chance of contracting, spreading” the disease, but instead was designed to reduce suffering IF a person contracted the disease.
If anyone wants to send Carleton an e-mail, here are the addresses: covidinfo@cunet.carleton.ca and I suggest CCing Suzanne.Blanchard@carleton.ca; jamie.davies@carleton.ca; accommodations@carleton.ca; graduate_studies@carleton.ca; advancement@carleton.ca; ravens@carleton.ca; registrar@carleton.ca; its.service.desk@carleton.ca; Benoit-Antoine.Bacon@carleton.ca; sandra.slater@carleton.ca
Tom Harris
Ottawa
They are all so brazen by now. They don't care if their info is demonstrably false or even if you and me know it is false.
This is the root lie of the jabs. People cannot afford to deal with reality, as they seized civil liberties based on a lie. They will cling to this lie until they are dead.
Someone should threaten to sue them for spreading misinformation. Thst would get them responding more quickly, I would guess.
Think they were paid (or threatened) to say that?
I think many of the universities have become politically-correct enforcers of woke group-think on this and many topics.