Omicron is mild. So why are kids in the hospital? I bet they are mostly vaccinated, despite what the story claims. If you work in a hospital, please comment!
That is the role of science but of course since people don't require real science to come to conclusions and bow down to "experts" without a shred of science there is no need for it. They prove it over and over again. No, Omicron doesn't exist, neither does Delta nor HIV nor Sars CoV 2, etc. People acknowledge it out of 1)fear 2) laziness 3) indoctrination.
A 66% incr in Covid +ve kids is a meaningless stat without more context. What is the usual daily expected paediatric hosp rate? If unchanged then this will just reflect the fact that lots of kids are currently covid positive, so of course plenty of kids going in for a broken toe will show up as a ‘case.’
Of course they’re “unvaccinated”, the vast majority of kids under 13 just barely got their first poisoning jab and haven’t yet lined up for the second one, and then we must wait tan additional 14 days after the second poisoning to be called ‘vaccinated’ …because ‘science’!
…even Fauxci had to change his tune yesterday by saying the kids are in there for different reasons but happen to test positive while there. What’s the different reason Fauxci gave? “Broken bones”…yes, nice try. I say ‘broken hearts’, as in myocarditis. Let’s sprinkle in a few strokes and seizures too.
It’s incredible people can not reason anything these days. It’s just a herd mentality that drinks the narrative dished out by propaganda. I swear, every time I heard of a kid ‘dying’ of covid in the last year, I automatically said “lies”, And they were lies.
Now people can’t seem to fathom how it is that all of a sudden kids are hospitalized when they never were hospitalized prior to this new ‘vaccination’ campaign on toddlers that just commenced a month or so ago!
Hospitals have the data for their patients. Insurance companies have the info for their members. You would be well served by getting info from a data analyst with access to a big insurance company's data warehouse.
Steve - We may have a *SMOKING GUN* now - here it is, though the graphs presented here are unclear and it might be worth speaking with these guys directly. Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Sam White and Dr. Wodarg have done a tremendous job in exposing this, as have Reiner Fuellmich and his team:
Omicron is probably safer than the vaccine. So why not just get it, and be done with this Covid crap? Omicron's not killing more than a handful of people. It's like getting a common cold. My concern is that the next variant will be a whole lot more deadly. The only question is whether natural immunity obtained from Omicron will be protective against that, which I suspect it will. Cowpox vs. smallpox, right? That's where vaccines began, and hopefully (in this case, at least) will end.
wonder if they thought they could claim the adverse reactions to the vaxx were omicron? when it came out that omicron is no worse than a cold, that put a kink in that idea.
They are ending the year exactly as they started it, "LYING". And don't expect anything different, until something different happens; like a whole new way of thinking worldwide!! Until people wake up and throw off this "wokeness" ( which is just another way to say asleep) nothing will change, only get worse, and children will continue to pay for our stupidity and fear of nothing. The big picture is sooo much bigger than we can even imagine. As far as vaccinated vs unvaccinated, there is NO SUCH THING AS VACCINATED in this scenario! That shot is nothing more that junk, designed to kill! And the sooner we start calling a spade a spade the sooner the sun will rise!!!👵😇 Happy New Year!
"But the other important thing is that if you look at the children who are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID," Fauci continued. "And what we mean by that — if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual. When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s overcounting the number of children who are, quote, 'hospitalized with COVID,' as opposed to because of COVID."
I would like to ask for the definition of 'unvaccinated'. I note it is only 'unvaccinated' versus 'FULLY vaccinated'. So, are they clumping together totally unvaccinated (if so how many of those?) with partially vaccinated? That would skew the picture quite a bit.
This is exactly what I’ve been saying for months. I’ve been asking everywhere for this info and have received nothing. They changed from unvaccinated and vaccinated to unvaccinated and fully vaccinated a few months ago. Since you’re not fully vaccinated until >14 days after last shot, this is the perfect way to lump adverse vaccine injuries into the unvaccinated group.
Maybe the vast majority of people hospitalized are truly unvaccinated, but I seriously doubt that’s the case since they’re doing a great job trying to hide that info and absolutely not being transparent.
Great question. Per CDC in order to be considered fully vaccinated.. 1st shot, then 28 days until the 2nd, then 14 days after that. If you get shots right on schedule then there is a 42 day window from 1st jab till "fully vaccinated". And most adverse events occur in that window. This is all before boosters come into the mix. I have yet to see data that is taking this group into account. From my understanding they take this group out of the data or just call the partially vaccinated "unvaccinated".
Since they call anyone who has only been jabbed once, and anyone who is less than 2 weeks from their 2nd jab "unvaccinated", of course they will say that all of these hospitalizations are "unvaccinated" people. Old trick. New day.
Using the PCR test the way they do(which is totally wrong by the way), even kiwi's and toad stools can test positive for Covid 19! Lol! That's been proven several times already. But most who have done it and published the results are now dead. Go figure.👵😇
Kiwi is another way to describe a New Zealander,as they have the bird, the Kiwi there.Shouldn't be an issue,most Kiwi's should know when the term is applying to them.Just letting you know,as I am an Aussie,we call New Zealanders Kiwis,all the time!
Right. And the first weeks following vaccination leave people more vulnerable to serious infection. No coincidence that these hospitalizations are happening just as the vaccines are rolling out. This study in the UK looked at how this is used to obfuscate vaccine efficacy data since, when you break it down more finely, there is a huge surge in deaths immediately after vaccine rollout--but these deaths get categorized as "unvaccinated" and therefore make the all cause mortality higher in that group. chrome-extension://gphandlahdpffmccakmbngmbjnjiiahp/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Neil-2/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination/links/61aa3d6750e22929cd4348cb/Latest-statistics-on-England-mortality-data-suggest-systematic-mis-categorisation-of-vaccine-status-and-uncertain-effectiveness-of-Covid-19-vaccination.pdf?origin=publication_detail
When are we going to stop looking for truth in any of these ridiculous tests and vaers reports? They've never told the truth from the beginning, so that should be some indication that it will never happen. Am I looking at this wrong?
"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)."
Almost every "scientific" paper I see on this subject uses the VAERS numbers to sloppily-prop-up the slogan "rare" (in reference to side-effects). But an ACTUAL examination of the reporting rate came up with an appropriate adjective with which to characterize the frequency of "injuries", (which INCLUDES deaths). The Harvard study proved that these events are "common", at least 100 times more common that the VAERS will ever report.
These so-called "scientists" claim they don't KNOW that the VAERS is merely a "LESS THAN 1%" sample of the actual numbers. Apparently, these "experts" are incapable to doing simple math, which REQUIRES that the VAERS numbers be multiplied by at least 100 times before they can even approach accuracy. So when VAERS reports 15K deaths (shortly after jabs) this means 1.5 million people have already been MURDERED by the jabs. And these are ONLY the ones who died almost immediately after the jabs. The vast majority of deaths from the jabs will occur over the next couple of years. These are delayed killing devices. The makers did not INTEND for so many to die so quickly after injection, and are fighting to hide the data.
An Oxford study from 2015 showed that 80% of the deaths after the jabs that ARE reported by VAERS, occurred within HOURS of the jabs. Part of the reason for this, is that the VAERS "reporting rules" block most of the death reports (they block MOST of the "less than 1%" that ever do get reported) even when the symptoms DO appear immediately after injection, but where it takes longer for the victim to actually DIE from their injuries. They will NEVER attribute a death that comes later, to any vaccine, no matter how OBVIOUS it is that the vaccine was the cause.
Oxford's "conclusion" was that there is nothing "concerning" about any of this, because after all, it is VERY common for a 99.74% VACCINE-exposed population to die of these "causes". (By vaccine-exposed, I am speaking of all vaccines.)
Add to this, the fact that the VAERS numbers keep mysteriously dropping - for no apparent reason. Out of the blue, we see the VAERS reported deaths suddenly being "adjusted" from close to 18K back down to 4 or 5K. And then, when a few more THOUSAND deaths stack onto the VEARS numbers, AGAIN they suddenly drop down, deleting thousands of reported deaths without explanation. The closest thing to an excuse for this that I can find, is merely the claim they've "adjusted" these numbers for us, and these are ALWAYS to adjust them DOWN. So it's clearly NOT an attempt to make the numbers more ACCURATE.
When 10 out of 10 times, a checker gives back the WRONG change in their OWN favor, we understand this as THEFT. They know perfectly well HOW to count change back. If it were merely "mistakes" then you'd find at least ONE example where it was in the customer's favor. Sickening.
The is an EXTERMINATION event. All hands are on deck to cover up their crimes while the depopulation agenda marches forward at "warp speed".
My group (The Control Group) is presently suing in Federal Court to obtain a nationwide injunction against all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status. We are set for oral argument in the 9th Circuit February 8th, 2022. We will NOT stop fighting.
If the Court's final answer is that there is no CIVIL remedy with which to prevent our own extermination,...well....I suppose this will only be for very private discussions amongst the truest of our Patriots. I do so hope our courts will prefer a CIVIL remedy to the alternative. These sham courts can claim the government's extermination of the American people is somehow "Constitutional" until they're blue in the face. There's just no way to convince anyone that any of this is somehow "legal".
Godspeed, and do NOT stop fighting however you still can.
Yep. All fraud. If you change the definition of "unvaccinated" to include people who just got jabbed, you can say the jabbed people are not at a "higher" risk of these "coincidental" HEART ATTACKS (or other effects) that happen shortly after getting jabbed. You can also claim a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". Nice trick. Not fooling anyone who actually LOOKS past the Mainstream propaganda sales-pitch though.
Can someone please prove that Omicron exists? And since there is NO TEST for it why does anyone acknowledge it? Thanks.
Buzz, not answering your question, but this is a timely read: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/remember-how-they-said-omicron-wasnt
I subscribe to hi sub stack. Everyone is accepting the existence of Omicron while there is NO proof of or test for it. So why are so many buying it?
That is the role of science but of course since people don't require real science to come to conclusions and bow down to "experts" without a shred of science there is no need for it. They prove it over and over again. No, Omicron doesn't exist, neither does Delta nor HIV nor Sars CoV 2, etc. People acknowledge it out of 1)fear 2) laziness 3) indoctrination.
A 66% incr in Covid +ve kids is a meaningless stat without more context. What is the usual daily expected paediatric hosp rate? If unchanged then this will just reflect the fact that lots of kids are currently covid positive, so of course plenty of kids going in for a broken toe will show up as a ‘case.’
Of course they’re “unvaccinated”, the vast majority of kids under 13 just barely got their first poisoning jab and haven’t yet lined up for the second one, and then we must wait tan additional 14 days after the second poisoning to be called ‘vaccinated’ …because ‘science’!
…even Fauxci had to change his tune yesterday by saying the kids are in there for different reasons but happen to test positive while there. What’s the different reason Fauxci gave? “Broken bones”…yes, nice try. I say ‘broken hearts’, as in myocarditis. Let’s sprinkle in a few strokes and seizures too.
It’s incredible people can not reason anything these days. It’s just a herd mentality that drinks the narrative dished out by propaganda. I swear, every time I heard of a kid ‘dying’ of covid in the last year, I automatically said “lies”, And they were lies.
Now people can’t seem to fathom how it is that all of a sudden kids are hospitalized when they never were hospitalized prior to this new ‘vaccination’ campaign on toddlers that just commenced a month or so ago!
Hospitals have the data for their patients. Insurance companies have the info for their members. You would be well served by getting info from a data analyst with access to a big insurance company's data warehouse.
There is NO TEST that confirms Omicron, it’s just the flu. If you have any way to confirm alleged Omicron do tell. I’ll wait.
Please contact Dr bill Smith who is doing a fantastic job on highlighting myocarditis as a result of the vaccine.
He has a telegram channel https://t.me/perimyocarditis
Steve - We may have a *SMOKING GUN* now - here it is, though the graphs presented here are unclear and it might be worth speaking with these guys directly. Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Sam White and Dr. Wodarg have done a tremendous job in exposing this, as have Reiner Fuellmich and his team:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-sam-white-dr-wolfgang-wodarg-intentional-killing-in-this-organised-trial_zxIXCnvZkdS148g.html
Watched,this is good,they need to get batch no:s under FOI,and many lawyers,Recommend everyone watch,save & share this
I am glad you brought that up. I've been thinking the same thing. Kids were skating past Covid until they started the vaccinations.
Omicron is probably safer than the vaccine. So why not just get it, and be done with this Covid crap? Omicron's not killing more than a handful of people. It's like getting a common cold. My concern is that the next variant will be a whole lot more deadly. The only question is whether natural immunity obtained from Omicron will be protective against that, which I suspect it will. Cowpox vs. smallpox, right? That's where vaccines began, and hopefully (in this case, at least) will end.
wonder if they thought they could claim the adverse reactions to the vaxx were omicron? when it came out that omicron is no worse than a cold, that put a kink in that idea.
They are ending the year exactly as they started it, "LYING". And don't expect anything different, until something different happens; like a whole new way of thinking worldwide!! Until people wake up and throw off this "wokeness" ( which is just another way to say asleep) nothing will change, only get worse, and children will continue to pay for our stupidity and fear of nothing. The big picture is sooo much bigger than we can even imagine. As far as vaccinated vs unvaccinated, there is NO SUCH THING AS VACCINATED in this scenario! That shot is nothing more that junk, designed to kill! And the sooner we start calling a spade a spade the sooner the sun will rise!!!👵😇 Happy New Year!
You nailed it, babe.
"But the other important thing is that if you look at the children who are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID," Fauci continued. "And what we mean by that — if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual. When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s overcounting the number of children who are, quote, 'hospitalized with COVID,' as opposed to because of COVID."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/broken-leg-anthony-fauci-child-covid-19-hospitalizations-overblown
relative 2-year-old had mild COVID but then had mis-c which was pretty serious.
I would like to ask for the definition of 'unvaccinated'. I note it is only 'unvaccinated' versus 'FULLY vaccinated'. So, are they clumping together totally unvaccinated (if so how many of those?) with partially vaccinated? That would skew the picture quite a bit.
This is exactly what I’ve been saying for months. I’ve been asking everywhere for this info and have received nothing. They changed from unvaccinated and vaccinated to unvaccinated and fully vaccinated a few months ago. Since you’re not fully vaccinated until >14 days after last shot, this is the perfect way to lump adverse vaccine injuries into the unvaccinated group.
Maybe the vast majority of people hospitalized are truly unvaccinated, but I seriously doubt that’s the case since they’re doing a great job trying to hide that info and absolutely not being transparent.
Great question. Per CDC in order to be considered fully vaccinated.. 1st shot, then 28 days until the 2nd, then 14 days after that. If you get shots right on schedule then there is a 42 day window from 1st jab till "fully vaccinated". And most adverse events occur in that window. This is all before boosters come into the mix. I have yet to see data that is taking this group into account. From my understanding they take this group out of the data or just call the partially vaccinated "unvaccinated".
Especially when ~60% of jabbed people test +ve within 14 days of the jab
Since they call anyone who has only been jabbed once, and anyone who is less than 2 weeks from their 2nd jab "unvaccinated", of course they will say that all of these hospitalizations are "unvaccinated" people. Old trick. New day.
Especially when ~60% of jabbed people test +ve within 14 days of the jab
Yep. Probably ALL of them would test positive, if not for the secret saline-only jabs they're also giving.
Using the PCR test the way they do(which is totally wrong by the way), even kiwi's and toad stools can test positive for Covid 19! Lol! That's been proven several times already. But most who have done it and published the results are now dead. Go figure.👵😇
Kiwi is another way to describe a New Zealander,as they have the bird, the Kiwi there.Shouldn't be an issue,most Kiwi's should know when the term is applying to them.Just letting you know,as I am an Aussie,we call New Zealanders Kiwis,all the time!
All true. Keep FIGHTING how ever you still can.
Right. And the first weeks following vaccination leave people more vulnerable to serious infection. No coincidence that these hospitalizations are happening just as the vaccines are rolling out. This study in the UK looked at how this is used to obfuscate vaccine efficacy data since, when you break it down more finely, there is a huge surge in deaths immediately after vaccine rollout--but these deaths get categorized as "unvaccinated" and therefore make the all cause mortality higher in that group. chrome-extension://gphandlahdpffmccakmbngmbjnjiiahp/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Neil-2/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination/links/61aa3d6750e22929cd4348cb/Latest-statistics-on-England-mortality-data-suggest-systematic-mis-categorisation-of-vaccine-status-and-uncertain-effectiveness-of-Covid-19-vaccination.pdf?origin=publication_detail
When are we going to stop looking for truth in any of these ridiculous tests and vaers reports? They've never told the truth from the beginning, so that should be some indication that it will never happen. Am I looking at this wrong?
Barbara, here is the Harvard study that proved the VAERS reports LESS THAN 1% of the actual injuries and DEATHS shortly after injection- (spread the link around;-) https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
NOTE the opening line on the summation page:
"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)."
Almost every "scientific" paper I see on this subject uses the VAERS numbers to sloppily-prop-up the slogan "rare" (in reference to side-effects). But an ACTUAL examination of the reporting rate came up with an appropriate adjective with which to characterize the frequency of "injuries", (which INCLUDES deaths). The Harvard study proved that these events are "common", at least 100 times more common that the VAERS will ever report.
These so-called "scientists" claim they don't KNOW that the VAERS is merely a "LESS THAN 1%" sample of the actual numbers. Apparently, these "experts" are incapable to doing simple math, which REQUIRES that the VAERS numbers be multiplied by at least 100 times before they can even approach accuracy. So when VAERS reports 15K deaths (shortly after jabs) this means 1.5 million people have already been MURDERED by the jabs. And these are ONLY the ones who died almost immediately after the jabs. The vast majority of deaths from the jabs will occur over the next couple of years. These are delayed killing devices. The makers did not INTEND for so many to die so quickly after injection, and are fighting to hide the data.
An Oxford study from 2015 showed that 80% of the deaths after the jabs that ARE reported by VAERS, occurred within HOURS of the jabs. Part of the reason for this, is that the VAERS "reporting rules" block most of the death reports (they block MOST of the "less than 1%" that ever do get reported) even when the symptoms DO appear immediately after injection, but where it takes longer for the victim to actually DIE from their injuries. They will NEVER attribute a death that comes later, to any vaccine, no matter how OBVIOUS it is that the vaccine was the cause.
Oxford's "conclusion" was that there is nothing "concerning" about any of this, because after all, it is VERY common for a 99.74% VACCINE-exposed population to die of these "causes". (By vaccine-exposed, I am speaking of all vaccines.)
Add to this, the fact that the VAERS numbers keep mysteriously dropping - for no apparent reason. Out of the blue, we see the VAERS reported deaths suddenly being "adjusted" from close to 18K back down to 4 or 5K. And then, when a few more THOUSAND deaths stack onto the VEARS numbers, AGAIN they suddenly drop down, deleting thousands of reported deaths without explanation. The closest thing to an excuse for this that I can find, is merely the claim they've "adjusted" these numbers for us, and these are ALWAYS to adjust them DOWN. So it's clearly NOT an attempt to make the numbers more ACCURATE.
When 10 out of 10 times, a checker gives back the WRONG change in their OWN favor, we understand this as THEFT. They know perfectly well HOW to count change back. If it were merely "mistakes" then you'd find at least ONE example where it was in the customer's favor. Sickening.
The is an EXTERMINATION event. All hands are on deck to cover up their crimes while the depopulation agenda marches forward at "warp speed".
My group (The Control Group) is presently suing in Federal Court to obtain a nationwide injunction against all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status. We are set for oral argument in the 9th Circuit February 8th, 2022. We will NOT stop fighting.
If the Court's final answer is that there is no CIVIL remedy with which to prevent our own extermination,...well....I suppose this will only be for very private discussions amongst the truest of our Patriots. I do so hope our courts will prefer a CIVIL remedy to the alternative. These sham courts can claim the government's extermination of the American people is somehow "Constitutional" until they're blue in the face. There's just no way to convince anyone that any of this is somehow "legal".
Godspeed, and do NOT stop fighting however you still can.
Joy Garner, founder of The Control Group
https://www.thecontrolgroup.org/
To see our casefiles: https://informedconsentdefense.org/
Yep. All fraud. If you change the definition of "unvaccinated" to include people who just got jabbed, you can say the jabbed people are not at a "higher" risk of these "coincidental" HEART ATTACKS (or other effects) that happen shortly after getting jabbed. You can also claim a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". Nice trick. Not fooling anyone who actually LOOKS past the Mainstream propaganda sales-pitch though.
Absolutely sick! These people are so disturbed.
these guys are great https://odysee.com/@David_Parker_and_Dawn_Lester:5 and I highly recommend their book "What really makes you ill". They are not from a medical background, which allows them to approach things from an unbiased angle. They spent 10 years researching material for their book. https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/book-preview/