Bob - no one has thus far provided evidence - including you. I teach chemistry and biology bob. With chemistry there are no opinions, there are no "beliefs" - there is only visual evidence. No one, not one person in this thread or perhaps the entire website that is substack, is a chemist.
It's okay if one is not a chemist but yall need to…
Bob - no one has thus far provided evidence - including you. I teach chemistry and biology bob. With chemistry there are no opinions, there are no "beliefs" - there is only visual evidence. No one, not one person in this thread or perhaps the entire website that is substack, is a chemist.
It's okay if one is not a chemist but yall need to not freak out when one suddenly shows up and is trying to get you all to understand the difference between actual molecular proof of efficacy - and hype from someone trying to sell you a product.
Actual visual proof of molecular efficacy: What happens when we mix pure red pigment with equal pigment of pure blue? We get purple - each time every time bob. We can actually see this chemical reaction among molecules before our very eyes. Chemistry is all about action/reaction - cause and effect. How does one molecule impact another - if it impacts it at all.
What happens when 2 parts of hydrogen meet up with one part of Oxygen - and we add a spark? We get water Bob - each time every time. We can actually see this.
Chemistry, unlike any other science discipline, is akin to math as regards visual proof and known results that are the same and happen each time everytime you combine the same variables. 2 Plus 2 will always be 4 bob - each time every time. This we know this we can see.
What we can't see bob, evergreen and everyone else on substack - is what molecules are doing inside the body. We don't have the technology for that - yet.
We have microscopes and in the lab we can see some interactions twixt molecules - but a lab is a hyper controlled environment - we can set up and manage for so many factors - and see each factor, each component, each player/variable - in real time - is 3d.
But this lab process - can only tell us so much. We can only learn so much about how a cell might react, how it might be impacted by a molecule or set of molecules - aka drug.
Once inside the human body, the human matrix - ALL BEST ARE OFF for truly knowing what is going on. We can't follow the molecules that make up ivermectin and see where they are going and what precisely they are doing.
What we do know from lab dynamics is that digestive enzymes, starting in the mouth and all throughout the digestive tracks - destroy molecules. The immune system also destroys foreign, alien molecules.
This we could see in a lab. If we put ivermectin in a vat of hydrochloric acid - the molecules would be Kaput. So we start there bob - how to keep that molecule from being destroyed once ingested? Or, if given intravenously, how do we keep the immune system from not seeing ivermectin as a threat and attacking it and destroying it?
We can't, we can't bob. 80 percent of big pharma money goes to drug delivery systems - because they know molecules get destroyed once they enter the body. 80 percent of funding on effective drug delivery systems - billions of dollars - always comes up short. Mother Nature is not defeated Bob.
So I don't want to hear anyone on this frekin website tell me ivermectin works to kill the virus that is covid - unless they can actually prove it on a molecular level.
You may or may not know this bob but you can make money selling any drug. Ivermectin sales are over 100 million a year...
Lots of drugs, all of which fail, make money bob.
The selling of pet rocks makes money bobby boy...
And finally, like so many fanatics - in their zealousness, end up going to extremes with claims that their product dujour, in your case ivermectin - cures cancer.
You have failed here bob. you have failed miserably.
Bob - no one has thus far provided evidence - including you. I teach chemistry and biology bob. With chemistry there are no opinions, there are no "beliefs" - there is only visual evidence. No one, not one person in this thread or perhaps the entire website that is substack, is a chemist.
It's okay if one is not a chemist but yall need to not freak out when one suddenly shows up and is trying to get you all to understand the difference between actual molecular proof of efficacy - and hype from someone trying to sell you a product.
Actual visual proof of molecular efficacy: What happens when we mix pure red pigment with equal pigment of pure blue? We get purple - each time every time bob. We can actually see this chemical reaction among molecules before our very eyes. Chemistry is all about action/reaction - cause and effect. How does one molecule impact another - if it impacts it at all.
What happens when 2 parts of hydrogen meet up with one part of Oxygen - and we add a spark? We get water Bob - each time every time. We can actually see this.
Chemistry, unlike any other science discipline, is akin to math as regards visual proof and known results that are the same and happen each time everytime you combine the same variables. 2 Plus 2 will always be 4 bob - each time every time. This we know this we can see.
What we can't see bob, evergreen and everyone else on substack - is what molecules are doing inside the body. We don't have the technology for that - yet.
We have microscopes and in the lab we can see some interactions twixt molecules - but a lab is a hyper controlled environment - we can set up and manage for so many factors - and see each factor, each component, each player/variable - in real time - is 3d.
But this lab process - can only tell us so much. We can only learn so much about how a cell might react, how it might be impacted by a molecule or set of molecules - aka drug.
Once inside the human body, the human matrix - ALL BEST ARE OFF for truly knowing what is going on. We can't follow the molecules that make up ivermectin and see where they are going and what precisely they are doing.
What we do know from lab dynamics is that digestive enzymes, starting in the mouth and all throughout the digestive tracks - destroy molecules. The immune system also destroys foreign, alien molecules.
This we could see in a lab. If we put ivermectin in a vat of hydrochloric acid - the molecules would be Kaput. So we start there bob - how to keep that molecule from being destroyed once ingested? Or, if given intravenously, how do we keep the immune system from not seeing ivermectin as a threat and attacking it and destroying it?
We can't, we can't bob. 80 percent of big pharma money goes to drug delivery systems - because they know molecules get destroyed once they enter the body. 80 percent of funding on effective drug delivery systems - billions of dollars - always comes up short. Mother Nature is not defeated Bob.
So I don't want to hear anyone on this frekin website tell me ivermectin works to kill the virus that is covid - unless they can actually prove it on a molecular level.
You may or may not know this bob but vaccines don't work. Details here:https://rev10.substack.com/p/vaccines-do-they-work-or-are-they
You may or may not know this bob but you can make money selling any drug. Ivermectin sales are over 100 million a year...
Lots of drugs, all of which fail, make money bob.
The selling of pet rocks makes money bobby boy...
And finally, like so many fanatics - in their zealousness, end up going to extremes with claims that their product dujour, in your case ivermectin - cures cancer.
You have failed here bob. you have failed miserably.
Bob, you're a grown ass man - Buy a pair and take the L...