First article, first reference therein contains meta-study with restrictive criteria and proper registration (much data out the window) and has this neat little caveat:
"No trial investigated ivermectin for prevention of infection or compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy."
First article, first reference therein contains meta-study with restrictive criteria and proper registration (much data out the window) and has this neat little caveat:
"No trial investigated ivermectin for prevention of infection or compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy."
Pierre Kory is probably the world's #1 proponent of ivermectin, and he admits that the efficacy of the substance is squared directly over prevention and immediate onset.
Alpha strain showed highest response to ivermectin, subsequent strains showed more resistance. As virulence increased, the window to allow ivermectin a chance to be effective required either prophylactic dosing or immediately upon first symptoms.
Any trial which observes mild to severe covid is missing the window almost entirely, and much of the trials were excluded, so there was no broad net to find even "arguable" efficacy with such a trial setup.
Regardless, it was not about proving efficacy. The authorities loved to present it that way, because they believe they had a silver tool in a vaccine, but that never materialized, as all vaccinated got covid as well. So, a vaccine it was not, but for so long it was argued that selection of a "placebo" was "harmful" because it allowed vaccine avoidance--a now known falsehood.
As for ivermectin - that too doesn't work. My science is based on observance of the molecule and no molecules in ivermectin have one, remained intact once inside the body, and two breached any rogue cell, any covid cell and did something to it. There is zero biologic value to ivermectin as regards curing the matters that are covid related. Same with vitamin D and all the other repurposed drugs, supplements, remedies that popped up with this pandemic that claimed to save the day.
In the case of covid, it was engineered to wreak havoc on the human immune system, so in this instance, intervention with steroids was mandatory for those who got behind the curve.
Of course, steroids don't do that. Steroids reduce the immune response. The immune response to the spike protein becomes dysregulated in susceptible people, and the damage stems from autoimmune disorder. The steroid knocks that off.
There is no immune response to the spike protein. Because it is harmless, innocuous. I could drink a cup of pure spike proteins and nothing would happen. Details here: Do vaccines work or don't they? Risk vs Reward - is the Juice worth the squeeze? No, and no.
First article, first reference therein contains meta-study with restrictive criteria and proper registration (much data out the window) and has this neat little caveat:
"No trial investigated ivermectin for prevention of infection or compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy."
Pierre Kory is probably the world's #1 proponent of ivermectin, and he admits that the efficacy of the substance is squared directly over prevention and immediate onset.
Alpha strain showed highest response to ivermectin, subsequent strains showed more resistance. As virulence increased, the window to allow ivermectin a chance to be effective required either prophylactic dosing or immediately upon first symptoms.
Any trial which observes mild to severe covid is missing the window almost entirely, and much of the trials were excluded, so there was no broad net to find even "arguable" efficacy with such a trial setup.
Regardless, it was not about proving efficacy. The authorities loved to present it that way, because they believe they had a silver tool in a vaccine, but that never materialized, as all vaccinated got covid as well. So, a vaccine it was not, but for so long it was argued that selection of a "placebo" was "harmful" because it allowed vaccine avoidance--a now known falsehood.
I'm the guy saying and showing vaccines don't work, can't work - it's my article on Substack.
Do vaccines work or don't they? Risk vs Reward - is the Juice worth the squeeze? No, and no.
https://rev10.substack.com/p/vaccines-do-they-work-or-are-they
As for ivermectin - that too doesn't work. My science is based on observance of the molecule and no molecules in ivermectin have one, remained intact once inside the body, and two breached any rogue cell, any covid cell and did something to it. There is zero biologic value to ivermectin as regards curing the matters that are covid related. Same with vitamin D and all the other repurposed drugs, supplements, remedies that popped up with this pandemic that claimed to save the day.
Prednisolone? Budesonide?
Those down regulate the immune system. It's what was needed for covid after a critical period of infection, when the immune response became erratic.
Nope. Leave the body alone - that's the only way to heal. We are so wired to always add something to the body - the body is screaming 'keep shit out!'
In the case of covid, it was engineered to wreak havoc on the human immune system, so in this instance, intervention with steroids was mandatory for those who got behind the curve.
No. Wrong. Incorrect. Ivermectin does nothing. Steroids also don't kill the virus that is covid.
Of course, steroids don't do that. Steroids reduce the immune response. The immune response to the spike protein becomes dysregulated in susceptible people, and the damage stems from autoimmune disorder. The steroid knocks that off.
There is no immune response to the spike protein. Because it is harmless, innocuous. I could drink a cup of pure spike proteins and nothing would happen. Details here: Do vaccines work or don't they? Risk vs Reward - is the Juice worth the squeeze? No, and no.
https://rev10.substack.com/p/vaccines-do-they-work-or-are-they