Cold liver is pretty much the definition of a strawman argument.
His "arguments" do little to nothing to help the purpose of Steve's substack. I figure he's either a person that needs to think he is important with his "deep levels of chem and bio ... what I bring to the table" (LOL) or he is a paid troll in an attempt to make the substack look kooky.
Cold liver is pretty much the definition of a strawman argument.
His "arguments" do little to nothing to help the purpose of Steve's substack. I figure he's either a person that needs to think he is important with his "deep levels of chem and bio ... what I bring to the table" (LOL) or he is a paid troll in an attempt to make the substack look kooky.
Steve's articles serve one purpose, but what he claims, is hard to prove. I can prove vaccines don't work. And once we know that, then we don't ever have to take vaccines again. Killing two birds with one stone.
Cold liver is pretty much the definition of a strawman argument.
His "arguments" do little to nothing to help the purpose of Steve's substack. I figure he's either a person that needs to think he is important with his "deep levels of chem and bio ... what I bring to the table" (LOL) or he is a paid troll in an attempt to make the substack look kooky.
Steve's articles serve one purpose, but what he claims, is hard to prove. I can prove vaccines don't work. And once we know that, then we don't ever have to take vaccines again. Killing two birds with one stone.