416 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

They’ve been allowed to report on J&J deaths. But the adenoviral vector was never intended to be in use for a long time anyway. The technology is older, already known to be dangerous, doesn’t work anymore after you’re immunized to the vector, it was always just there to make the mRNA cash cows look better.

Expand full comment

Now, this is about the technology. So the vector containing the nucleotides coding for the spike protein, is and was known to be dangerous. It's not only the product, it's also the mRNA delivered in the jab.

Does the immune system manage to mount an attack on the mRNA before it enters the cells? That would clearly reduce the way it's supposed to work in the following jabs.

Expand full comment

No as a matter of fact the mRNA is modified to eliminate its immunogenicity. That means the vaccine has no adjuvant. Look up “mRNA vaccines take on immune tolerance”. This type of vaccine does the reverse of what a vaccine is supposed to do - it ERASES immunity to the targeted antigen. That’s why it wears off so quick and the boosters need to come more frequently. It turns you into an asymptomatic virus factory, like you know how a bat can breed viruses inside its body without getting sick? If you get the vaccine... if my theory is correct, that’s you now 🦇

That issue is particular to the platform however. Myocarditis and blood clots are due to the spike protein itself and I imagine are a result of a failure to induce immunotolerance.

Expand full comment