I'm calling BS on the numbers and conclusions in this article.
Firstly the sample size is way too small. You're looking at 501 households and extrapolating the results to the entire population of the US, which is about 330 million. If I flip a coin 500 times it might come up heads 300 times and tails 200 times. This doesn't mean that if …
I'm calling BS on the numbers and conclusions in this article.
Firstly the sample size is way too small. You're looking at 501 households and extrapolating the results to the entire population of the US, which is about 330 million. If I flip a coin 500 times it might come up heads 300 times and tails 200 times. This doesn't mean that if I flip that same coin 5 million times it'll come up heads 3 million times and tails 2 million times. Actually it is far more likely it'll come up heads 2.5 million times and tails 2.5 million times since, as we know, there is a 50-50 chance of it coming up either way.
Secondly, out of the 501 households there are 299 households in which people have been vaccinated (Q10). Out of these 299 households with vaccinated people there are 12 households in which someone has died, presumably from the vaccine (Q15). But we don't know how old these people were, if they had any underlying conditions, etc that may have contributed to their death.
Thirdly, the 501 households represent a total of 1689 people, not including the 501 people filling out the survey (Q9). Out of these 1689 people 968 people have been vaccinated (Q11). However, the survey doesn't tell us how many of these 968 vaccinated people have died after getting vaccinated, you only know that in 12 households one or more people have died (Q15). So you're lacking data to determine what percentage of vaccinated people have died.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm against people getting vaccinated with an experimental vaccine. Because as long as the last phase of clinical testing hasn't been completed, the phase that takes about 3 to 4 years during which test subjects are monitored to determine any long term side effects, this is still an experimental vaccine (until 2023/2024). I also worry about the synthetic mRNA that is being used and that'll stay in the body for at least 60 days and has your cells create the Spike protein during that time. And thus puts pressure on the immune system all that time. I also worry about the nano-lipids that are used as a delivery system for the mRNA and what barriers (such as the blood-brain barrier) this will enable it to pass.
But you have to base the conclusions you make in this article on solid data, not a survey with a too small sample size and lacking data. If you look at the data from VAERS about 29.000 people have reportedly died from getting vaccinated. Of course the real number is much higher. Let's assume (even though we know what that does to you and me) that the real number is 10 times higher. Then you're looking at 290.000 deaths due to vaccination, not 600.000. Still a lot of people and this number will probably become a lot bigger in the future since we're only seeing the short term side effects.
The last part of my comment seems to be missing, I at least don't see it:
But you have to base the conclusions you make in this article on solid data, not a survey with a too small sample size and lacking data. If you look at the data from VAERS about 29.000 people have reportedly died from getting vaccinated. Of course the real number is much higher. Let's assume (even though we know what that does to you and me) that the real number is 10 times higher. Then you're looking at 290.000 deaths due to vaccination, not 600.000. Still a lot of people and this number will probably become a lot bigger in the future since we're only seeing the short term side effects.
I state that I'm against people getting vaccinated with an experimental vaccine but you think I got the vaccine myself. Okay, I'll spell it out for you: No, I didn't take the jab.
With that resolved, maybe you'd like to react to the content of my comment?
I'm calling BS on the numbers and conclusions in this article.
Firstly the sample size is way too small. You're looking at 501 households and extrapolating the results to the entire population of the US, which is about 330 million. If I flip a coin 500 times it might come up heads 300 times and tails 200 times. This doesn't mean that if I flip that same coin 5 million times it'll come up heads 3 million times and tails 2 million times. Actually it is far more likely it'll come up heads 2.5 million times and tails 2.5 million times since, as we know, there is a 50-50 chance of it coming up either way.
Secondly, out of the 501 households there are 299 households in which people have been vaccinated (Q10). Out of these 299 households with vaccinated people there are 12 households in which someone has died, presumably from the vaccine (Q15). But we don't know how old these people were, if they had any underlying conditions, etc that may have contributed to their death.
Thirdly, the 501 households represent a total of 1689 people, not including the 501 people filling out the survey (Q9). Out of these 1689 people 968 people have been vaccinated (Q11). However, the survey doesn't tell us how many of these 968 vaccinated people have died after getting vaccinated, you only know that in 12 households one or more people have died (Q15). So you're lacking data to determine what percentage of vaccinated people have died.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm against people getting vaccinated with an experimental vaccine. Because as long as the last phase of clinical testing hasn't been completed, the phase that takes about 3 to 4 years during which test subjects are monitored to determine any long term side effects, this is still an experimental vaccine (until 2023/2024). I also worry about the synthetic mRNA that is being used and that'll stay in the body for at least 60 days and has your cells create the Spike protein during that time. And thus puts pressure on the immune system all that time. I also worry about the nano-lipids that are used as a delivery system for the mRNA and what barriers (such as the blood-brain barrier) this will enable it to pass.
But you have to base the conclusions you make in this article on solid data, not a survey with a too small sample size and lacking data. If you look at the data from VAERS about 29.000 people have reportedly died from getting vaccinated. Of course the real number is much higher. Let's assume (even though we know what that does to you and me) that the real number is 10 times higher. Then you're looking at 290.000 deaths due to vaccination, not 600.000. Still a lot of people and this number will probably become a lot bigger in the future since we're only seeing the short term side effects.
The last part of my comment seems to be missing, I at least don't see it:
But you have to base the conclusions you make in this article on solid data, not a survey with a too small sample size and lacking data. If you look at the data from VAERS about 29.000 people have reportedly died from getting vaccinated. Of course the real number is much higher. Let's assume (even though we know what that does to you and me) that the real number is 10 times higher. Then you're looking at 290.000 deaths due to vaccination, not 600.000. Still a lot of people and this number will probably become a lot bigger in the future since we're only seeing the short term side effects.
Took the jab, didn't you...good luck.
I state that I'm against people getting vaccinated with an experimental vaccine but you think I got the vaccine myself. Okay, I'll spell it out for you: No, I didn't take the jab.
With that resolved, maybe you'd like to react to the content of my comment?
Sure you didn't. Good luck with your ticking time bomb.
Jeez, another one with an IQ smaller than his shoe size.
I DIDN'T TAKE THE JAB. How can I make it any clearer?
Now, do you have anything constructive to say or is making dumb comments all you've got going for yourself?
You sound a lot like controlled opposition. Also, weak insult.
Right, so nothing constructive to say. Thank you so much for your time and effort, too bad it doesn't amount to anything substantial.