"Dr Zubin Damania, the podcast host, suggests that the only reasonable way to debate you would be to conduct it like a trial, with a discovery process"
Smells of moving the goalposts. I highly doubt this is the only way. Were Pfizer required to debate the safety of their products in a court trial where they had to present all their safety…
"Dr Zubin Damania, the podcast host, suggests that the only reasonable way to debate you would be to conduct it like a trial, with a discovery process"
Smells of moving the goalposts. I highly doubt this is the only way. Were Pfizer required to debate the safety of their products in a court trial where they had to present all their safety data upfront prior to approval? Did Zubin have to use a court system when he got his doctorate?
What's with the arbitrary system of debate? The irony is, Zubin is holding a conversation in real time on the subject in a podcast, but apparently is unable to hold another conversation in real time on the same subject?
He declares himself a medical expert but he's worried a non-medical expert is going to spring a medical piece of knowledge he doesn't know about? Isn't it his job to know? Isn't he supposed to be more informed than you are?
Even for, argument's sake, you had hidden a lot of points... isn't he supposed to be the one to pick what part of the subject to debate about? Why would it be surprising to him? How's he supposed to declare you 'misinformation' or 'disinformation' if he admits he doesn't know what the facts are?
This is an embarrassing admission of ignorance on Zubin's part. It's also quite petty if those were his concerns, because he could have easily asked for any number of possible solutions, such as asking you to present him with the information you intend to use in advance. But if he hasn't even read your public information, how is it "disinformation"? And if it's all super-secret hidden from view, how is it supposed to have misled people if no-one has seen it?
This man is full of it, and is clearly chickening out of a debate.
Also, court hearings are infamous for taking an absurdly long amount of time on the order of years. It's a completely inappropriate debate format. Who does he propose is the judge? The jury? A legal team? Also, why a discovery process, does he think you have top secret hidden insider information? You use that on private data, not public. What an absolute fraudulent crock.
Given Johns Hopkins involvement in Event 201, I would guess these two clowns will hang once the public finally comes to terms with the reality that they've been murdered with a slow kill bio-weapon.
Bad idea. Libel laws should not exist. They imply that someone should be in charge of Truth. Free speech means we all must tolerate BS and that includes tolerating those who accuse others of BS.
Sounds like you just fell into the typical cover-your-ass trap of picking sides because someone yells louder. What details of UttarP. does he mention? ? ?
nada! Just some well rehearsed hand-waving and name calling. Keep your eye on the ball!
Looking at all the new comments it's clear we are all on the same side of sanity. The weird new game they are playing, just being aggressive and louder, trying to intimidate, has a good chance of success. It relies on their willingness to go all-in on a lie and compound it with more lies. Refuting the truth is for pussies now; who needs data and logic when you can scream louder to a wider audience, amplified by msm? just make up what you know will play well with the preconditioning and the subjects will lap it up.
It's happening to everyone and it's on a subconscious level. But I would bet you are a very analytical type that verify and never assume. I mean no disrespect because i also do it. Virgos are all analytical.
The guy was lying through his smarmy smug photoshoot self-image.
You are right. Makary is not making suggestions to have a debate; he is making excuses to avoid one. In fact, Steve does not even need to present any data. He has shown that a few unanswerable questions can explode the entire house of lies. Therefore, he must never be allowed to ask those questions.
"Dr Zubin Damania, the podcast host, suggests that the only reasonable way to debate you would be to conduct it like a trial, with a discovery process"
Smells of moving the goalposts. I highly doubt this is the only way. Were Pfizer required to debate the safety of their products in a court trial where they had to present all their safety data upfront prior to approval? Did Zubin have to use a court system when he got his doctorate?
What's with the arbitrary system of debate? The irony is, Zubin is holding a conversation in real time on the subject in a podcast, but apparently is unable to hold another conversation in real time on the same subject?
He declares himself a medical expert but he's worried a non-medical expert is going to spring a medical piece of knowledge he doesn't know about? Isn't it his job to know? Isn't he supposed to be more informed than you are?
Even for, argument's sake, you had hidden a lot of points... isn't he supposed to be the one to pick what part of the subject to debate about? Why would it be surprising to him? How's he supposed to declare you 'misinformation' or 'disinformation' if he admits he doesn't know what the facts are?
This is an embarrassing admission of ignorance on Zubin's part. It's also quite petty if those were his concerns, because he could have easily asked for any number of possible solutions, such as asking you to present him with the information you intend to use in advance. But if he hasn't even read your public information, how is it "disinformation"? And if it's all super-secret hidden from view, how is it supposed to have misled people if no-one has seen it?
This man is full of it, and is clearly chickening out of a debate.
Also, court hearings are infamous for taking an absurdly long amount of time on the order of years. It's a completely inappropriate debate format. Who does he propose is the judge? The jury? A legal team? Also, why a discovery process, does he think you have top secret hidden insider information? You use that on private data, not public. What an absolute fraudulent crock.
Given Johns Hopkins involvement in Event 201, I would guess these two clowns will hang once the public finally comes to terms with the reality that they've been murdered with a slow kill bio-weapon.
why would he settle for a measly $1M when he’s hooked up to the lifetime gravy train subscription?
I couldn't agree more.
How dumb can Makary be! I have stacks of data on Uttar Pradesh that clearly support your expose.
Bad idea. Libel laws should not exist. They imply that someone should be in charge of Truth. Free speech means we all must tolerate BS and that includes tolerating those who accuse others of BS.
Sounds like you just fell into the typical cover-your-ass trap of picking sides because someone yells louder. What details of UttarP. does he mention? ? ?
nada! Just some well rehearsed hand-waving and name calling. Keep your eye on the ball!
Looking at all the new comments it's clear we are all on the same side of sanity. The weird new game they are playing, just being aggressive and louder, trying to intimidate, has a good chance of success. It relies on their willingness to go all-in on a lie and compound it with more lies. Refuting the truth is for pussies now; who needs data and logic when you can scream louder to a wider audience, amplified by msm? just make up what you know will play well with the preconditioning and the subjects will lap it up.
It's happening to everyone and it's on a subconscious level. But I would bet you are a very analytical type that verify and never assume. I mean no disrespect because i also do it. Virgos are all analytical.
The guy was lying through his smarmy smug photoshoot self-image.
Ooooooooooooookay.
You are right. Makary is not making suggestions to have a debate; he is making excuses to avoid one. In fact, Steve does not even need to present any data. He has shown that a few unanswerable questions can explode the entire house of lies. Therefore, he must never be allowed to ask those questions.
But, who has the most ears? Right doesn’t always have the stage.
BINGO, to many hard questions and he probably don,t have the answers