If it's any help, when the 'covid' fraud started, I walked down to UCSF and put up posters on all the lampposts outside UCSF with information showing it was fake. Wachter is CIA, btw.
Build suspense. " Today was a very good day"(in the old days, a day to pick a white stone to mark it......)
Your audience is harsh (as we should be, so many disappointments) make it good buddy!
Tuesday inches nearer....
EDIT upon a reread my post feels vaguely menacing. That was not in my feelings when written. I am hopeful for good news, even just moderate good news is fine. And if our host feels he had a day to remember, well mark it with something. A white stone, put it on the mantlepiece. Old school.
The UCSF faculty statistics are pretty mind blowing to me. 3 years in and given all we know about the dangers of mrna injections '50%" of these college professors are "fence sitters" and not sure if the vax is safe or not. If this survey is accurate, it speaks volumes about the critical thinking skills of most professors.
I watched the Dr. Drew episode, and I was very impressed with how Dr. Drew challenged Dr. Dan on some of his assertions, especially when those observations (aka the official narrative) directly conflict with Dr. Drew's personal clinical experience. My observation is that when Dr. Dan is challenged, he changes the point he is making. Slippery. Hard to pin down. I would love to see Dr. McCullough eat him alive on some of his assertions. He also tries to claim that more children have died from COVID than were counted despite all of the financial incentives to count ANY death within 28 days of a positive PCR test for SARS-COV2 as a COVID death. Dr. Drew pinned him down on that and he did not have a good basis for the statement.
What happened re the "Great Covid debate"?
"A source inside UCSF estimates that 25% of the faculty are red pill, 25% are blue pill, and 50% are in the middle"
It's beyond naive to believe this source.
Steve, "buried his lede" with his mention of a well-known billionaire who might be joining our cause soon. Talk about narrative-changers.
I just saw an update that the Covid debate will take place today @5pm
Looks like #TwitterFiles Covid/Fauci drop will be rescheduled until Thursday
Please, Steve, please can you get on this Comment thread and tell us all, finally,
(a) what the final, OFFICIAL time of the debate is, PST;
(b) if there is another platform besides Twitter to hear it live (for those who don't Tweet); and
(c) where, if at all, it will be available for streaming for those who want to direct friends and family after the debate?
Tomorrow's the Big Day...
If it's any help, when the 'covid' fraud started, I walked down to UCSF and put up posters on all the lampposts outside UCSF with information showing it was fake. Wachter is CIA, btw.
Thank you Steve!!
Can't wait!!!
Can’t wait for tomorrow’s news!
haha
Build suspense. " Today was a very good day"(in the old days, a day to pick a white stone to mark it......)
Your audience is harsh (as we should be, so many disappointments) make it good buddy!
Tuesday inches nearer....
EDIT upon a reread my post feels vaguely menacing. That was not in my feelings when written. I am hopeful for good news, even just moderate good news is fine. And if our host feels he had a day to remember, well mark it with something. A white stone, put it on the mantlepiece. Old school.
The UCSF faculty statistics are pretty mind blowing to me. 3 years in and given all we know about the dangers of mrna injections '50%" of these college professors are "fence sitters" and not sure if the vax is safe or not. If this survey is accurate, it speaks volumes about the critical thinking skills of most professors.
Great! Btw, I think you have the time wrong. When I click the link it says Wed 3pm - you might want to change it on your post!
AMEN.
As Leonidas said in 300,
"SUBMISSION now that's gonna be a problem. "
I watched the Dr. Drew episode, and I was very impressed with how Dr. Drew challenged Dr. Dan on some of his assertions, especially when those observations (aka the official narrative) directly conflict with Dr. Drew's personal clinical experience. My observation is that when Dr. Dan is challenged, he changes the point he is making. Slippery. Hard to pin down. I would love to see Dr. McCullough eat him alive on some of his assertions. He also tries to claim that more children have died from COVID than were counted despite all of the financial incentives to count ANY death within 28 days of a positive PCR test for SARS-COV2 as a COVID death. Dr. Drew pinned him down on that and he did not have a good basis for the statement.