The UCSF faculty statistics are pretty mind blowing to me. 3 years in and given all we know about the dangers of mrna injections '50%" of these college professors are "fence sitters" and not sure if the vax is safe or not. If this survey is accurate, it speaks volumes about the critical thinking skills of most professors.
The UCSF faculty statistics are pretty mind blowing to me. 3 years in and given all we know about the dangers of mrna injections '50%" of these college professors are "fence sitters" and not sure if the vax is safe or not. If this survey is accurate, it speaks volumes about the critical thinking skills of most professors.
I have a "suspicion" that those 50% that are "in the middle" aren't in the middle at all. They're not stupid, there is no countervailing evidence against the dangers of the exp gene therapy, so they're "in the middle" for one simple reason:
Fear.
They want a clear road to their MD goal, they don't want to muck up their chances to succeed, so they keep their mouths shut and just furrow their brows and nod when they hear the latest negative evidence against the gene therapies.
The UCSF faculty statistics are pretty mind blowing to me. 3 years in and given all we know about the dangers of mrna injections '50%" of these college professors are "fence sitters" and not sure if the vax is safe or not. If this survey is accurate, it speaks volumes about the critical thinking skills of most professors.
I have a "suspicion" that those 50% that are "in the middle" aren't in the middle at all. They're not stupid, there is no countervailing evidence against the dangers of the exp gene therapy, so they're "in the middle" for one simple reason:
Fear.
They want a clear road to their MD goal, they don't want to muck up their chances to succeed, so they keep their mouths shut and just furrow their brows and nod when they hear the latest negative evidence against the gene therapies.