dare i suggest that this too is a complete waste of time.
a convinced covid fanatic will NEVER concede defeat and will insist that you will owe his charity, even if you wipe the floor with him with science and reason
Moreover I did learn the hard way, debating about other issues, that it is impossible to beat CHEATS.
dare i suggest that this too is a complete waste of time.
a convinced covid fanatic will NEVER concede defeat and will insist that you will owe his charity, even if you wipe the floor with him with science and reason
Moreover I did learn the hard way, debating about other issues, that it is impossible to beat CHEATS.
and fanatics are CHEATS
yo might be lucky if you can get some kind of unprejudiced arbiter to judge the debate. but i would not hold your breath on that one either
On the other hand; many people write in the comments that reading the articles here convinced them to become "ex-vaxxers" so perhaps it doesn't matter if they accept the debate or not.
dare i suggest that this too is a complete waste of time.
a convinced covid fanatic will NEVER concede defeat and will insist that you will owe his charity, even if you wipe the floor with him with science and reason
Moreover I did learn the hard way, debating about other issues, that it is impossible to beat CHEATS.
and fanatics are CHEATS
yo might be lucky if you can get some kind of unprejudiced arbiter to judge the debate. but i would not hold your breath on that one either
On the other hand; many people write in the comments that reading the articles here convinced them to become "ex-vaxxers" so perhaps it doesn't matter if they accept the debate or not.
good point.
and of course one might perhaps debate not to convince the opponent who is beyond that, but to reach thr audience