205 Comments

Steve saw this thought you might like it..

JAMES LYONS WEILER SUBSTACK

COVID-19 Vaccine Limited Immunity Durability Was Knowable from the Start: No Long-Lived Plasma Cells

Completely knowable from the first small trial.

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-immunity-durability

ARCHIVED ⬇️

https://web.archive.org/web/20240928152312/https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-immunity-durability

Expand full comment

Thanks for that. It joins a few more dots. Might explain the Cleveland Clinic's observations.

Expand full comment

yup!

Expand full comment

Look out for immunology video by James Lyon’s Weiler and Dr Steven Pelech.

Expand full comment

This is true

Expand full comment

More information:

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP and Chief Scientist of Pfizer, warned about the myocarditi, birth defects kidney dysfunction, miscarriages, cancer, Bells Palsy,

blood clots, pneumonia and more from the vaxx. I was blocked for 28 days for trying to disclose his letter. The Frontline Doctors, founded by Dr. Simone Gold, tried to warn citizens as well as so many other doctors. Obama and others built the Wuhan Lab with our taxpayers dollars! Dr. Fauci worked in the lab for three years making $4 million while still working for the USA. Bill Gates, George Soros and the One World Order were instrumental in promoting the vaxx. Their primary goals 1 Destroy the USA 2 Destroy Israel 3 Proglobalization and 4 Depopulation. According to some studies our world population has decreased by about 1 billion. So much information is available and should be followed!

Expand full comment

Is there like a competition for “world’s most objective epidemiologist”?

Expand full comment

Yeah well, Oopsie-Daisy!

They lied about this one… I’m sure they’re telling the truth about the Covid-19 virus isolation, right?

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you 🙏

Expand full comment

There is no such thing as “the world’s most objective epidemiologist.”

Expand full comment

I didn’t get one ‘cause I research all medicine before taking it. Why didn’t You?

Expand full comment

And, I’m certain it’s a lot worse than this, seeing how most people die suddenly and can’t speak for themselves. Then, a coroner puts that they died of COVID 19 on their death certificate and doesn’t even consider that it could be from the COVID vaccines they’ve had. My cousin died suddenly and they first said it was a heart attack; then, they changed it to COVID 19 death. No one had diagnosed him with COVID 19 and no one said he was sick. He was 51 yrs old, lived alone, but was around people all the time. Surely, someone would’ve mentioned that he had been sick, but they didn’t. They just said he didn’t shown up to work when usually he’s was there everyday.

Expand full comment

No vax!!!

Expand full comment

Closing the barn door after the horses out are out!

Expand full comment

it's like how many times do they have to prove that they're not safe and people have to die or have vaccine injury for people to believe this

Again, I'm gonna post the link to the Florida surgeon general statement based on research and facts

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/FLDOH/bulletins/3b56786

Expand full comment

The Vaccines are not safe...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😁

That's the dumbest wording

..

The Vaccines are deadly.

Death

a 12 year old in Kevin Spaceys basement has a higher survival rate

Expand full comment

Dr. Laxton's criticisms are not "gaslighting." He made valid points about the limitations of your research. Your rejoinders only work as a rationale for the deficiency of your methodology, not a support for the strength of your conclusions. That is not important to anyone. Soft data does not firm up because you bit off more than you could chew. If you aren't able to assess relevant confounding factors, you can't make educated guesses about possible causation. If you aren't doing a sampling comparison of the vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated, your correlations are shaky.

There's this popular misconception that statistical studies that provide correlative values and confidence intervals of 95% must be authoritative, because Numbers. Because Big Data Sets. I've reviewed too many overgeneralized data comparisons that more closely resemble guided meditations intended to induce hypnotic suggestion. Your study isn't quite that bad, but you are overselling it. And accusing your critics of "gaslighting" simply because they've identified the limitations of your database comparisons is a bad look.

To sum up: no, your claim of increased mortality in the vaccinated is not "vindicated." It's a murky insinuation to begin with. It doesn't even offer much of a starting point for further researches.

Expand full comment

They are not vaccines. They are not biological. The injection is made up of many formulations of toxins that eventually kill, some fast some slow.

Expand full comment

Thank you for all the hard data here. This took quite a bit of work. Thank you.

Expand full comment