Steve, you declare in the pinned post: "I couldnтАЩt find any commenter that offered a superior set of тАЬfraud tests.тАЭ No alternatives were proposed at all. If you donтАЩt like my list, why not tell us the correct list?"
My "correct list" is one test, which is universally agreed upon by scientists: Studies must control for confounding factors (such as pollution).
I'm debating you NOW. And you're using money as a distraction.
You are avoiding answering my simple questions. If you want a response answer my questions first. Thank you. See the pinned post
Steve, you declare in the pinned post: "I couldnтАЩt find any commenter that offered a superior set of тАЬfraud tests.тАЭ No alternatives were proposed at all. If you donтАЩt like my list, why not tell us the correct list?"
My "correct list" is one test, which is universally agreed upon by scientists: Studies must control for confounding factors (such as pollution).
Virology fails that test.
that's silly. that's not how science works.
Actually, it does work that way.
"To ensure the internal validity of your research, you must consider the impact of confounding variables."
https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/confounding-variables