8 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Yay, science by spectacle & debate with prizes, yay!!!!

There are no pictures of viruses, as if that would prove they cause illness and are transmissible (it wouldn't).

The electron microscope images taken from abused, highly adulterated tissue samples merely show little grey blobs, indistinguishable from exosomes.

If I showed you a blurry black & white picture of a bridge in Florida would you buy it?

Maybe you're confused by the shiny colorful artist's imaginings of what a virus would look like if anyone could see one? (they can't). You know, the sexed-up drawings that artists make up out of whole cloth, and that the media obligingly plaster everywhere you look to brainwash the masses?

Virology: smoke & mirrors

Expand full comment

The last time I looked at toxic purified protein it was in liquid form, not much to see under a microscope. That is probably why it cannot be isolated. It is nothing more than decomposed liquid from rotting cells.

Expand full comment

there were pictures of viruses in the last article with an OPTICAL microscope. Yay!

Expand full comment

Was the photo from a cell culture?

Expand full comment

We've gotta have a talk about that bridge, I can get you a great price!

Expand full comment

I've added a new section at the end of the article responding to the comments. Before posting a comment here, please read that section.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2022Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Beat it clown. Go play in your delusional 'no virus' Substacks.

Expand full comment