There is a conference at GSU on March 24 that I will be attending. They didn't invite me to speak, so I'm writing this Substack to submit my suggestions. I bet mine are better than theirs.
Eliminate the HHS. However, if that is not feasible, at least make a law that all cabinet members who can legally make rules and regulations cannot sign a rule or regulations into practice unless the rule/regulation details the downsides as well as the benefits. IOW, if the rule or regulation is implemented, who will be harmed, how they will be harmed, what will cause the harm, and how long will they be harmed. The benefits of the law should also be spelled out in detail and the proposed rule/regulation should then be subject to the scrutiny of the people before it can be signed.
Easy answer: COMPLETELY DEFUND, together w/ most of the other United SNAKES Corp, D[e]C[eit] "agencies" Especially the DOJ and its SS FBI - "Feral Bassturd Intimidators/Inquisitors/Insurrectionist"!
That's nice that you want to restore trust in the CDC and FDA. I don't see any need for these agencies. I want them eliminated. Let the people exercise their right to sue for damages, and let free markets operate. The FDA is engaged in racketeering with the drug companies by demonizing powerful natural solutions. Solutions so cheap and so powerful that they cannot compete with them.
Even today, Christians are rotting in a prison outside the U.S. because they taught people how to make powerful remedies using natural resources. I can't begin to tell you how wrong that is. And it has nothing to do with protecting us from those powerful remedies, it's all about removing competition from their shared market.
If it were up to me I would ban all tax exemptions on scientific research. I would make all alternatives fair play for all. I would shut down every health related agency except for the NCBI library which is a resource we should keep.
Scientists should earn their money like the rest of us. No tax exempt, tax funded science.
The trust in these corrupted captured agencies will never be restored for better or worse, but I say better. “Trust the experts” is a stupid concept. So is “trust the science.” These are for stupid people who cannot think for themselves. But I like your article Steve, thanks and please carry on.
Like the cowards they are, the vaccine legal wall has decided they don't want us in the same room as them. They have made the conference online only. I was looking forward to being there in person.
"Hello,
Thank you for registering for Georgia State Law’s upcoming Health Law Symposium, March 23 and 24, 2023. We are excited to host this event and to have you join us either or both days. Please note this change: due to unforeseen circumstances, this event has been moved fully online, and the agenda has been slightly adjusted to reflect this change. All registrants will be provided a link in advance of the event. We apologize if you have received multiple emails with this announcement and for any inconvenience. We appreciate your attendance and support.
Create special outside committees to recommend sweeping changes to the FDA, CDC, and NIH. These committees should be headed by and populated by experts who were calling these organizations out on their corruption, and the organizations' leaders beheaded by the committee heads.
I liked your suggestions for the GSU conference. If you didn't add these to your list, I'd include these impossible things: Cut out funding for (now, I'm not sure, I think it is the CDC) from any outside groups (read: Pharma). Why are these government oversight organizations even allowed outside funds? The figure I heard was that the CDC receives 64% of it's funding from big pharma (and in the UK, their equivalent organization receives more than 80% of it's funding from the same sources!) I'm pretty sure this amounts to bribery. And, the more impossible thing is career trajectory of former government employees into pharma. It would make sense if they were research positions - but they seem to be all going to overpaid positions of influence.
Added more items. Now at 32!!
I would prefer abolition. How about we call ourselves neo-abolitionists.
Restore trust in the CDC? You've got to be kidding me right.
People who don't want to learn wreck it for those who do, I've seen it firsthand in inner city high school.
So now the event organizers are doing it virtual only due to unexplained reasons. did they get wind of Steve coming and chicken out?
Eliminate the HHS. However, if that is not feasible, at least make a law that all cabinet members who can legally make rules and regulations cannot sign a rule or regulations into practice unless the rule/regulation details the downsides as well as the benefits. IOW, if the rule or regulation is implemented, who will be harmed, how they will be harmed, what will cause the harm, and how long will they be harmed. The benefits of the law should also be spelled out in detail and the proposed rule/regulation should then be subject to the scrutiny of the people before it can be signed.
Easy answer: COMPLETELY DEFUND, together w/ most of the other United SNAKES Corp, D[e]C[eit] "agencies" Especially the DOJ and its SS FBI - "Feral Bassturd Intimidators/Inquisitors/Insurrectionist"!
That's nice that you want to restore trust in the CDC and FDA. I don't see any need for these agencies. I want them eliminated. Let the people exercise their right to sue for damages, and let free markets operate. The FDA is engaged in racketeering with the drug companies by demonizing powerful natural solutions. Solutions so cheap and so powerful that they cannot compete with them.
Even today, Christians are rotting in a prison outside the U.S. because they taught people how to make powerful remedies using natural resources. I can't begin to tell you how wrong that is. And it has nothing to do with protecting us from those powerful remedies, it's all about removing competition from their shared market.
If it were up to me I would ban all tax exemptions on scientific research. I would make all alternatives fair play for all. I would shut down every health related agency except for the NCBI library which is a resource we should keep.
Scientists should earn their money like the rest of us. No tax exempt, tax funded science.
The trust in these corrupted captured agencies will never be restored for better or worse, but I say better. “Trust the experts” is a stupid concept. So is “trust the science.” These are for stupid people who cannot think for themselves. But I like your article Steve, thanks and please carry on.
Silly rabbit! You write as if you think they care about being truthful and transparent.
Like the cowards they are, the vaccine legal wall has decided they don't want us in the same room as them. They have made the conference online only. I was looking forward to being there in person.
"Hello,
Thank you for registering for Georgia State Law’s upcoming Health Law Symposium, March 23 and 24, 2023. We are excited to host this event and to have you join us either or both days. Please note this change: due to unforeseen circumstances, this event has been moved fully online, and the agenda has been slightly adjusted to reflect this change. All registrants will be provided a link in advance of the event. We apologize if you have received multiple emails with this announcement and for any inconvenience. We appreciate your attendance and support.
Stacie
Stacie Kershner, JD
Deputy Director
Center for Law, Health & Society
Georgia State Law"
There is no restoring trust. They are pure profit driven. They burned that bridge.
#34 🎯
I would like to make a little edit to number 20:
Create special outside committees to recommend sweeping changes to the FDA, CDC, and NIH. These committees should be headed by and populated by experts who were calling these organizations out on their corruption, and the organizations' leaders beheaded by the committee heads.
Steve, what are you thinking? WHY try to restore faith in CDC and FDA?
I liked your suggestions for the GSU conference. If you didn't add these to your list, I'd include these impossible things: Cut out funding for (now, I'm not sure, I think it is the CDC) from any outside groups (read: Pharma). Why are these government oversight organizations even allowed outside funds? The figure I heard was that the CDC receives 64% of it's funding from big pharma (and in the UK, their equivalent organization receives more than 80% of it's funding from the same sources!) I'm pretty sure this amounts to bribery. And, the more impossible thing is career trajectory of former government employees into pharma. It would make sense if they were research positions - but they seem to be all going to overpaid positions of influence.