Harvard achieves scientific consensus by eliminating those who disagree
Harvard should should change their shield from "Veritas" to "Comply."
Executive summary
Welcome to the new world where scientific consensus is achieved by eliminating or silencing people who dissent.
Harvard fires Professor Martin Kulldorff
“I am no longer a professor of medicine at Harvard,” Kulldorff wrote. “The Harvard motto is Veritas, Latin for truth. But, as I discovered, truth can get you fired.”
7.5M views on his tweet.
Full story here (by Kulldorff)
Video interview of Martin Kulldorff by Stanford Professor Jay Bhattacharya (the first video interview after the firing)
Harvard Fires Professor For Being Right About COVID Policy Failures (Ian Miller article)
Former Harvard professor blasts university over COVID, claims 'truth can get you fired' (NBC)
Harvard Fires Professor Who Co-wrote Great Barrington Declaration (CHD)
Perhaps it is time for Harvard to replace their shield to better reflect their institutional values?
Summary
Welcome to the new world where scientific consensus is achieved by intimidating, silencing, firing, decredentialing, or eliminating the opposition.
Also, we still have no idea why Harvard dropped their COVID vaccination mandate for students. Nobody is talking. Who made the decision and on what basis? It’s all a secret and nobody is being held accountable. Debates are not permitted.
Do what you are told, do not ask questions, and you will not get fired is the chilling message that Harvard is sending to their faculty.
Academia is now infested with mindless political ideologues masquerading as "intellectuals". It, and they, are worthy only of our disdain.
I read this article yesterday on another substack.
Great that Prof Kulldorf spoke truth to power, but I had to stop reading when he said, and the Barrington Group did also, that the "vaccines" should be reserved for the elderly.
If I hear this one more time!
If over 65's and the elderly have somewhat diminished immune systems due to age, or greatly diminished immune systems due to disease, how on God's green earth is it safe or beneficial to take this poisonous shot?????
I am so tired of hearing this.
If the shot is dangerous, it's dangerous - for everybody!
I am almost 70 years old. I will not take another shot in my life after what I have learned.
If I were child bearing age I would not let my child get one shot much less the over 70 that are now mandated.
Has Kulldorff, Malone, McCullough read "Dissolving Illusions" or "Turtle's All the Way Down"
OK, just my opinion, but I think they are all poison and unnecessary.
In any case, Prof Kulldorff, Please stop advocating these mrna shots for the elderly. It is dangerous and insulting.
Thank you.
(I have been a patient at Brigham and Women for many many years. What has happened there is nothing short of frightening. Mass General Brigham now owns 26 hospitals in MA. It is a medical franchise. And boy do you fall through the cracks. It is very chilling indeed to have nowhere else to turn. Because the other hospitals are all owned by insurance conglomerates, too. It's a minefield.)