3 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Not a single group or individual that I am aware of pushing back have "forensically" obtained and tested a vaccine lot to determine if it is designed to trigger existing medical conditions or a persons genetic predisposition to specific conditions once it enters the body. This is what is missing to back up the data. The "smoking gun" so to speak. None of the alleged smoking guns I have seen have been able to be questioned and when I have asked for the procedures and methodologies to back the clalms the claimants used to determine their findings, It is either crickets or attacks.

Expand full comment

Are they able to obtain batch samples as you suggest? As time passes, the 'old' vaccines diminish/ exhaust so as to be no longer available. Also, how do you programme the nursing staff to give certain patients one batch and other patients another batch? Wouldn't some whistle blower nurse have emerged by now?

Expand full comment

Many of these researchers are registered doctors and would be able to obtain samples from different batches round the country to provide more randomisation in any testing. There is a site called "whats my batch" for vaccine injured don't have the link. What that uncovered was certain batch numbers produced higher levels of adverse events. In any medical environment they would receive different batches or they may have received specific batches allocated by the supplier. They have to use them in order of receipt due to shelf life as noted. There are plenty of whistleblowers, but the problem becomes "chain of evidence" custody. The samples have to be preserved according to the manufacturers requirements, and tested as per manufacturers spec, Pfizer's must be diluted with a specific solution to get five doses out of the bottle. So you have to test the product as it is intended for use. If at any point the sample has not been transported, stored or handled according to spec, the test results become null and void.

Expand full comment