I've assembled a list of ways you can support the courageous nurse whistleblowers who came on our show a month ago on Jan 18 in an epic 4 hour episode. Also: CDPH responds to my FOIA on fetal demise!
What happened with the COVID shots merely uncovered how unbelievably corrupt the medical establishment has been for a century. Big Pharma has suppressed off-patent cancer cures such as ivermectin and fenbendazole simply because they would devastate profits. https://fastwell.substack.com/p/an-odd-cure-for-incurable-cancer
It's no longer the healthcare industry--it's the sickcare industry. This happened when John D. Rockefeller consolidated medical schools in the 1920s, causing half of them to close down and controlling the curriculum taught in the rest. He even had doctors jailed who didn't fall in line with his "a pill for an ill" mentality. He owned stock in the first pharmaceutical companies so made sure that all doctors knew was how to write scripts.https://fastwell.substack.com/p/a-pill-for-an-ill-the-story-of-modern
Re the California Department of Public health's refusal to share the data - how is it even possible that a state body, the purpose of which is to serve the public, refuses to release the data about public health to the public? It's a rhetorical question of course...
I tried the vitamin B3. I took one capsule of 500 MG. Ended up in Hospital. Skin flush and racing heart. 4 days later still struggling with hot flashes and dizziness.
I did not read Steve's article. Dr. Joe Mercola happened to post an article about Glaucoma around the same time of Steve's article which I did read. (Mercola's articles are free for the first 48 hours before they are put behind a paywall.) The following supplements mentioned in his article that can be helpful were: melatonin (helps lower intraocular pressure), lutein (ideally from food - egg yolks) helps to prevent glaucoma, ginkgo biloba (slows the progression), Chinese skullcap (improves symptoms), nicotinamide (B3) has significant improvement in retinal function.
We'll see, Cov... As I said, we are breaking new ground now, since SA and NZ Courts have declared the mandates themselves unlawful... The game is changing, the corrupt in the captured system are being removed one by one, so let's see what eventuates... Timing is everything....
Steve Kirsch's substack. -- https://kirschsubstack.com/ is also on the case big time as far as shitty, unvetted by FDA, childhood vaccines casing autism. A common comment is, "My baby or child got a childhood vaccine, and his (her) light went out." Worst thing is that vaccine might have been mandated by his/her school.
****** Spread the word everywhere for Steve's substack!
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, Trump passed a law citting that ANY company working for the government cannot be subject to a FOIA request......let that sink in......Devils all around ....
I don’t think that is true Judicial Watch has filed several FOIS request from several government dept. they take forever to get them but they have Revived several, you can look up their site it gives a lot of them, to many bad rumors . Until you see it written it is not proven.
Catherine Austin Fitts has mentioned it several times. Unfortunately, I'm not a member of her website. I don't believe for one minute that she would make that up. Sorry
has to do with LE records which are shielded (sadly) from FOIA. Trump did not sign anti FOIA order nor was any legislation passed to that effect. It's bad enough we have secret courts now legal after 911 with the bushes, clintons, obama, and now their installed sock puppet JoeZo = all intel club coup.
Pick a nation, pick a party, pick a church; Scum often raises to the top by lies, buys, or dies.
Harsh? Yes. Reality!
Strength and intelligence, and vigilance married to diligence, always purging that scum off when it rises so "clear water" transparency / accountability protecting reality instead of confusion narratives and chaos.
The President cannot pass any law. Congress passes laws. Do you mean an executive order (which should not be considered a law, since the Constitution says that "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States ...")? Or do you mean that, somewhere buried in thousands of pages of legalese that Congress passed without reading and analyzing it first, and then signed by Trump, there was some provision creating exemptions from FOIA requests? In either case, please cite the source, since it should be publicly available. Otherwise, your claim is simply a rumor (possibly true, but unverifiable).
Judicial Watch has filed for several FOIA and have received them from many different government dept, it takes awhile but they do get them, I don’t believe that. I watch Judicial Watch file many law suites and they really watch out for the people.
Sorry Thomas. I dont have a membership to Catherine Austine Fits Website. She has mentioned this several times in interviews. I would lean toward a bill passed under the radar. I want to say 54 or 55 or 56. I will try to find this interview for you. She mentioned it again recently in an interview on utube!. My apologies for my terrible memory. Not terrible enough that I didn't remember what she said though.....I would encourage you to look.her up. She is a powerhouse of information with a very interesting history working for HUD under Bush. She saw 1 trillion go missing every year in that department with no accountability.
A Bill perhaps. Bill 56? 54, 55 ....somewhere around that. I have heard her mention it more than once. I know Catherine Austin Fits would not lie. It's my fault for not having the right terminology
This post is related to whistle-blowing, as well as the time we all have for reading articles like this one, and contributing to stopping the corruption indicated by the denial of the FOIA request. It's about an area of corruption that an unknown number of us are facing, and that before now I didn't know, concretely, how it could be occurring.
This is about the diminishing availability of family homes, and the difficulty of families in purchasing the homes that are available. Owning a home, in turn impacts both financial security that leads to better health outcomes as well as direct shelter in which to nurture health, plus the time available to read substack articles and to help stop corruption.
Here's one astonishing. concrete way in which two longtime family homes in two different longtime cohesive neighborhoods in my city, have very readily been usurped:
Recently, one of the homes, two doors down from me in my very peaceful family-friendly neighborhood, was sold by a family with three children under the age of 5. The owners were approached with a letter from someone, Mr Z, which said he had a friend looking for a place to live in this city, and they should please get in touch with him if they ever wanted to sell their home. They decided to purchase a larger home nearby, and got in touch with Mr Z, who put them in touch with with his friend, Mr. X. Mr. X recently purchased two restaurants from Mr Z, one of which is near this neighborhood. Mr X told the sellers that he wanted to live here (near his restaurant), and made an offer to purchase their home, which they accepted. Before the closing, Mr. X requested that the name of the buyer be changed to an LLC named with the street address of the home being purchased. They assumed it was his LLC, accepted the change and completed the closing (i.e., the sale of the property). The closing happened first through a meeting with the buyer, and two hours later with a meeting with the seller, so the seller did not meet the buyer at the closing. Now the LLC owns the property. It turns out the LLC has a registered Agent, who is not Mr X or Mr Z, but whose office address is in our city. The registered Agent allows the Principal(s) of the LLC to be undisclosed (i.e., anonymous). This LLC in fact has undisclosed Principal(s), and their registered address is the same as the office address of their Agent. As an interesting footnote, the registered address of the Agent includes the country, USA, spelled out in all caps, whereas the same address of the Principal(s) does not include the country. I'm not claiming anything about this last piece of information, but it stood out for me, both because only one of the addresses had the country included and because I've registered three LLCs in this State in the past ten years, and I haven't ever feel the need to specify the USA on any of the addresses I provided when registering those LLCs. One concern I have about this whole thing is that the Principal(s) of the LLC could have their primary residence (or possibly even citizenship) outside this city, state, or country, but it's only one of many concerns and it's not in my most pressing concerns.
Within days of the closing, the LLC filed a Proposal with our City to divide the lot into two lots, with one of the lots being the entire front yard of the existing home. I am not kidding about this. the front yard is also the only usable yard space for the home. The backyard is a very steep ravine. The proposed new lot is just barely large enough to qualify as a "buildable lot". Furthermore, our city's current ordinances are written in a way that this Proposal might actually be approved, based on very narrow constraints that define the only conditions under which such a Proposal can be denied. Like with the pandemic response, it appears that someone must have thought about how to construct the ordinances before initiating such a Proposal and the strategy to obtain the property in the first place.
A similar scheme is in progress in another location in our city. In that case, the new LLC with undisclosed Principal(s) was able to get approval to create a new (buildable) lot from the entire side yard of a historic inn that the LLC purchased. Mr. Z had also initiated the LLC's purchase of that inn. The new, min size buildable lot next to the inn has been purchased (by a local business executive) for a cost that is roughly comparable to the average cost of a home in this city. The new lot owner has submitted more than one proposal to build on the lot; each proposal to build has been denied due to strong objections by stakeholders during the approval process. It's unknown what will happen next with that lot. So far, many very talented and productive people have spent untold hours preventing construction of a nonsensical and unsightly new home next to the historic inn.
All homeowners who want to preserve family homes and neighborhoods: please make sure you when you sell your home, to sell it to an individual or entity with a publicly available identity.
I have no idea who the owner(s) of the property two doors down from me is or are or where in the world they live. One way to resist the corruption, and protect our health, is to hang on to the property we have, and to pass it along to others who will wisely use it. Three previous owners of the property the LLC now owns near me, were families with school-age children and parents who work long hours nearby. It wouldn't be difficult to sell a home to another family like that. We've been in a "sellers market" for many years now. Let's be smart about who we sell our family homes to.
Our neighborhood and city has some very savvy attorneys who may (or may not) be able to thwart the approval of the proposal near me. Stage one of the approval sailed right on through, partly because the LLC submitted the proposal so quickly after closing, partly because the city moved so swiftly to schedule the public hearing, partly because the notice of the public hearing came during a school vacation period when many neighbors were busy with family time, partly because the city ordinance is written so narrowly (it's, frankly, ridiculous!), and partly because of the unexpected complexity of the undisclosed property owners. It seems that our City officials (including our City Attorneys) either don't know the difference between a Representative of an LLC (who filed the Proposal to divide the property) and a Principal of an LLC, or they don't care, because at the public hearing and since, our City officials haven't requested Mr X to state his relationship to the LLC, and they treat him and/or call him the owner of the property. Again, a lot of this is reminiscent of the confusing way the pandemic unfolded. I mention all of this so that others can be prepared for the various tactics that keep reasonable and talented opponents of the tactics off-balance.
It never occurred to me before that this method of buying a family home could happen, and I myself am glad that I am prepared to deal with such corruption should it occur when I sell my home. Hope others find it helpful to know this example as well.
God Bless you all and Thank you
What happened with the COVID shots merely uncovered how unbelievably corrupt the medical establishment has been for a century. Big Pharma has suppressed off-patent cancer cures such as ivermectin and fenbendazole simply because they would devastate profits. https://fastwell.substack.com/p/an-odd-cure-for-incurable-cancer
They have refused to tell type 2 diabetics that they could reverse their disease with diet and handed them piles of drugs instead. https://fastwell.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-on-curing-type-2-diabetes
They have handed out psychiatry drugs like candy when a change in diet shows incredible promise.
https://fastwell.substack.com/p/how-one-harvard-doc-is-astonishing
It's no longer the healthcare industry--it's the sickcare industry. This happened when John D. Rockefeller consolidated medical schools in the 1920s, causing half of them to close down and controlling the curriculum taught in the rest. He even had doctors jailed who didn't fall in line with his "a pill for an ill" mentality. He owned stock in the first pharmaceutical companies so made sure that all doctors knew was how to write scripts.https://fastwell.substack.com/p/a-pill-for-an-ill-the-story-of-modern
Re the California Department of Public health's refusal to share the data - how is it even possible that a state body, the purpose of which is to serve the public, refuses to release the data about public health to the public? It's a rhetorical question of course...
Look at who runs it.
What beautiful souls these truly are, and thanks for everyone supporting them.
Watched the whole thing! We really need to turn the page on this and stop the madness! It's still crazy!
Another one who completely believed the propaganda has now been red pilled. A doctor who obeyed every government order has now been red pilled.
https://www.youtube.com/live/v3N-uFfvU5s?feature=shared
Forgot to mention I took the b3 because it was recommended for glocoma. So glad I only took 500 instead of the recommended 1000.
I tried the vitamin B3. I took one capsule of 500 MG. Ended up in Hospital. Skin flush and racing heart. 4 days later still struggling with hot flashes and dizziness.
Steve,
Can you unlock your post on vision loss? I know some people it might help and I am sure others here also.
It has been behind a paywall for several days now. Can you release it
Thank you
Very disappointed in this. Stock tips behind a paywall, sure.
A way to help with glaucoma? Very very puzzling.
Hi Trish,
I did not read Steve's article. Dr. Joe Mercola happened to post an article about Glaucoma around the same time of Steve's article which I did read. (Mercola's articles are free for the first 48 hours before they are put behind a paywall.) The following supplements mentioned in his article that can be helpful were: melatonin (helps lower intraocular pressure), lutein (ideally from food - egg yolks) helps to prevent glaucoma, ginkgo biloba (slows the progression), Chinese skullcap (improves symptoms), nicotinamide (B3) has significant improvement in retinal function.
We'll see, Cov... As I said, we are breaking new ground now, since SA and NZ Courts have declared the mandates themselves unlawful... The game is changing, the corrupt in the captured system are being removed one by one, so let's see what eventuates... Timing is everything....
Off topic>>
I posted at twit just now>>>
Steve Kirsch's substack. -- https://kirschsubstack.com/ is also on the case big time as far as shitty, unvetted by FDA, childhood vaccines casing autism. A common comment is, "My baby or child got a childhood vaccine, and his (her) light went out." Worst thing is that vaccine might have been mandated by his/her school.
****** Spread the word everywhere for Steve's substack!
Steve, 4 hours is a LONG time to watch. Would it be possible for you or someone else to create a 20 minute highlight version? Thanks.
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, Trump passed a law citting that ANY company working for the government cannot be subject to a FOIA request......let that sink in......Devils all around ....
I don’t think that is true Judicial Watch has filed several FOIS request from several government dept. they take forever to get them but they have Revived several, you can look up their site it gives a lot of them, to many bad rumors . Until you see it written it is not proven.
Catherine Austin Fitts has mentioned it several times. Unfortunately, I'm not a member of her website. I don't believe for one minute that she would make that up. Sorry
has to do with LE records which are shielded (sadly) from FOIA. Trump did not sign anti FOIA order nor was any legislation passed to that effect. It's bad enough we have secret courts now legal after 911 with the bushes, clintons, obama, and now their installed sock puppet JoeZo = all intel club coup.
Pick a nation, pick a party, pick a church; Scum often raises to the top by lies, buys, or dies.
Harsh? Yes. Reality!
Strength and intelligence, and vigilance married to diligence, always purging that scum off when it rises so "clear water" transparency / accountability protecting reality instead of confusion narratives and chaos.
The President cannot pass any law. Congress passes laws. Do you mean an executive order (which should not be considered a law, since the Constitution says that "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States ...")? Or do you mean that, somewhere buried in thousands of pages of legalese that Congress passed without reading and analyzing it first, and then signed by Trump, there was some provision creating exemptions from FOIA requests? In either case, please cite the source, since it should be publicly available. Otherwise, your claim is simply a rumor (possibly true, but unverifiable).
Judicial Watch has filed for several FOIA and have received them from many different government dept, it takes awhile but they do get them, I don’t believe that. I watch Judicial Watch file many law suites and they really watch out for the people.
Sorry Thomas. I dont have a membership to Catherine Austine Fits Website. She has mentioned this several times in interviews. I would lean toward a bill passed under the radar. I want to say 54 or 55 or 56. I will try to find this interview for you. She mentioned it again recently in an interview on utube!. My apologies for my terrible memory. Not terrible enough that I didn't remember what she said though.....I would encourage you to look.her up. She is a powerhouse of information with a very interesting history working for HUD under Bush. She saw 1 trillion go missing every year in that department with no accountability.
A Bill perhaps. Bill 56? 54, 55 ....somewhere around that. I have heard her mention it more than once. I know Catherine Austin Fits would not lie. It's my fault for not having the right terminology
Thank you for this follow-up and for having us on for this important episode. 🙏💕
Here is a page with 2021 CA fetal death numbers, and it does not show anywhere near a 90-fold increase. How can this be explained?
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DMCAH/surveillance/Pages/Fetal-Mortality.aspx
This post is related to whistle-blowing, as well as the time we all have for reading articles like this one, and contributing to stopping the corruption indicated by the denial of the FOIA request. It's about an area of corruption that an unknown number of us are facing, and that before now I didn't know, concretely, how it could be occurring.
This is about the diminishing availability of family homes, and the difficulty of families in purchasing the homes that are available. Owning a home, in turn impacts both financial security that leads to better health outcomes as well as direct shelter in which to nurture health, plus the time available to read substack articles and to help stop corruption.
Here's one astonishing. concrete way in which two longtime family homes in two different longtime cohesive neighborhoods in my city, have very readily been usurped:
Recently, one of the homes, two doors down from me in my very peaceful family-friendly neighborhood, was sold by a family with three children under the age of 5. The owners were approached with a letter from someone, Mr Z, which said he had a friend looking for a place to live in this city, and they should please get in touch with him if they ever wanted to sell their home. They decided to purchase a larger home nearby, and got in touch with Mr Z, who put them in touch with with his friend, Mr. X. Mr. X recently purchased two restaurants from Mr Z, one of which is near this neighborhood. Mr X told the sellers that he wanted to live here (near his restaurant), and made an offer to purchase their home, which they accepted. Before the closing, Mr. X requested that the name of the buyer be changed to an LLC named with the street address of the home being purchased. They assumed it was his LLC, accepted the change and completed the closing (i.e., the sale of the property). The closing happened first through a meeting with the buyer, and two hours later with a meeting with the seller, so the seller did not meet the buyer at the closing. Now the LLC owns the property. It turns out the LLC has a registered Agent, who is not Mr X or Mr Z, but whose office address is in our city. The registered Agent allows the Principal(s) of the LLC to be undisclosed (i.e., anonymous). This LLC in fact has undisclosed Principal(s), and their registered address is the same as the office address of their Agent. As an interesting footnote, the registered address of the Agent includes the country, USA, spelled out in all caps, whereas the same address of the Principal(s) does not include the country. I'm not claiming anything about this last piece of information, but it stood out for me, both because only one of the addresses had the country included and because I've registered three LLCs in this State in the past ten years, and I haven't ever feel the need to specify the USA on any of the addresses I provided when registering those LLCs. One concern I have about this whole thing is that the Principal(s) of the LLC could have their primary residence (or possibly even citizenship) outside this city, state, or country, but it's only one of many concerns and it's not in my most pressing concerns.
Within days of the closing, the LLC filed a Proposal with our City to divide the lot into two lots, with one of the lots being the entire front yard of the existing home. I am not kidding about this. the front yard is also the only usable yard space for the home. The backyard is a very steep ravine. The proposed new lot is just barely large enough to qualify as a "buildable lot". Furthermore, our city's current ordinances are written in a way that this Proposal might actually be approved, based on very narrow constraints that define the only conditions under which such a Proposal can be denied. Like with the pandemic response, it appears that someone must have thought about how to construct the ordinances before initiating such a Proposal and the strategy to obtain the property in the first place.
A similar scheme is in progress in another location in our city. In that case, the new LLC with undisclosed Principal(s) was able to get approval to create a new (buildable) lot from the entire side yard of a historic inn that the LLC purchased. Mr. Z had also initiated the LLC's purchase of that inn. The new, min size buildable lot next to the inn has been purchased (by a local business executive) for a cost that is roughly comparable to the average cost of a home in this city. The new lot owner has submitted more than one proposal to build on the lot; each proposal to build has been denied due to strong objections by stakeholders during the approval process. It's unknown what will happen next with that lot. So far, many very talented and productive people have spent untold hours preventing construction of a nonsensical and unsightly new home next to the historic inn.
All homeowners who want to preserve family homes and neighborhoods: please make sure you when you sell your home, to sell it to an individual or entity with a publicly available identity.
I have no idea who the owner(s) of the property two doors down from me is or are or where in the world they live. One way to resist the corruption, and protect our health, is to hang on to the property we have, and to pass it along to others who will wisely use it. Three previous owners of the property the LLC now owns near me, were families with school-age children and parents who work long hours nearby. It wouldn't be difficult to sell a home to another family like that. We've been in a "sellers market" for many years now. Let's be smart about who we sell our family homes to.
Our neighborhood and city has some very savvy attorneys who may (or may not) be able to thwart the approval of the proposal near me. Stage one of the approval sailed right on through, partly because the LLC submitted the proposal so quickly after closing, partly because the city moved so swiftly to schedule the public hearing, partly because the notice of the public hearing came during a school vacation period when many neighbors were busy with family time, partly because the city ordinance is written so narrowly (it's, frankly, ridiculous!), and partly because of the unexpected complexity of the undisclosed property owners. It seems that our City officials (including our City Attorneys) either don't know the difference between a Representative of an LLC (who filed the Proposal to divide the property) and a Principal of an LLC, or they don't care, because at the public hearing and since, our City officials haven't requested Mr X to state his relationship to the LLC, and they treat him and/or call him the owner of the property. Again, a lot of this is reminiscent of the confusing way the pandemic unfolded. I mention all of this so that others can be prepared for the various tactics that keep reasonable and talented opponents of the tactics off-balance.
It never occurred to me before that this method of buying a family home could happen, and I myself am glad that I am prepared to deal with such corruption should it occur when I sell my home. Hope others find it helpful to know this example as well.
DEATH TO GLOBALLASSED 💣☠️⚰️🔥