According to Catherine Austin Fitts, Trump passed a law citting that ANY company working for the government cannot be subject to a FOIA request......let that sink in......Devils all around ....
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, Trump passed a law citting that ANY company working for the government cannot be subject to a FOIA request......let that sink in......Devils all around ....
I don’t think that is true Judicial Watch has filed several FOIS request from several government dept. they take forever to get them but they have Revived several, you can look up their site it gives a lot of them, to many bad rumors . Until you see it written it is not proven.
Catherine Austin Fitts has mentioned it several times. Unfortunately, I'm not a member of her website. I don't believe for one minute that she would make that up. Sorry
has to do with LE records which are shielded (sadly) from FOIA. Trump did not sign anti FOIA order nor was any legislation passed to that effect. It's bad enough we have secret courts now legal after 911 with the bushes, clintons, obama, and now their installed sock puppet JoeZo = all intel club coup.
Pick a nation, pick a party, pick a church; Scum often raises to the top by lies, buys, or dies.
Harsh? Yes. Reality!
Strength and intelligence, and vigilance married to diligence, always purging that scum off when it rises so "clear water" transparency / accountability protecting reality instead of confusion narratives and chaos.
The President cannot pass any law. Congress passes laws. Do you mean an executive order (which should not be considered a law, since the Constitution says that "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States ...")? Or do you mean that, somewhere buried in thousands of pages of legalese that Congress passed without reading and analyzing it first, and then signed by Trump, there was some provision creating exemptions from FOIA requests? In either case, please cite the source, since it should be publicly available. Otherwise, your claim is simply a rumor (possibly true, but unverifiable).
Judicial Watch has filed for several FOIA and have received them from many different government dept, it takes awhile but they do get them, I don’t believe that. I watch Judicial Watch file many law suites and they really watch out for the people.
Sorry Thomas. I dont have a membership to Catherine Austine Fits Website. She has mentioned this several times in interviews. I would lean toward a bill passed under the radar. I want to say 54 or 55 or 56. I will try to find this interview for you. She mentioned it again recently in an interview on utube!. My apologies for my terrible memory. Not terrible enough that I didn't remember what she said though.....I would encourage you to look.her up. She is a powerhouse of information with a very interesting history working for HUD under Bush. She saw 1 trillion go missing every year in that department with no accountability.
A Bill perhaps. Bill 56? 54, 55 ....somewhere around that. I have heard her mention it more than once. I know Catherine Austin Fits would not lie. It's my fault for not having the right terminology
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, Trump passed a law citting that ANY company working for the government cannot be subject to a FOIA request......let that sink in......Devils all around ....
I don’t think that is true Judicial Watch has filed several FOIS request from several government dept. they take forever to get them but they have Revived several, you can look up their site it gives a lot of them, to many bad rumors . Until you see it written it is not proven.
Catherine Austin Fitts has mentioned it several times. Unfortunately, I'm not a member of her website. I don't believe for one minute that she would make that up. Sorry
has to do with LE records which are shielded (sadly) from FOIA. Trump did not sign anti FOIA order nor was any legislation passed to that effect. It's bad enough we have secret courts now legal after 911 with the bushes, clintons, obama, and now their installed sock puppet JoeZo = all intel club coup.
Pick a nation, pick a party, pick a church; Scum often raises to the top by lies, buys, or dies.
Harsh? Yes. Reality!
Strength and intelligence, and vigilance married to diligence, always purging that scum off when it rises so "clear water" transparency / accountability protecting reality instead of confusion narratives and chaos.
The President cannot pass any law. Congress passes laws. Do you mean an executive order (which should not be considered a law, since the Constitution says that "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States ...")? Or do you mean that, somewhere buried in thousands of pages of legalese that Congress passed without reading and analyzing it first, and then signed by Trump, there was some provision creating exemptions from FOIA requests? In either case, please cite the source, since it should be publicly available. Otherwise, your claim is simply a rumor (possibly true, but unverifiable).
Judicial Watch has filed for several FOIA and have received them from many different government dept, it takes awhile but they do get them, I don’t believe that. I watch Judicial Watch file many law suites and they really watch out for the people.
Sorry Thomas. I dont have a membership to Catherine Austine Fits Website. She has mentioned this several times in interviews. I would lean toward a bill passed under the radar. I want to say 54 or 55 or 56. I will try to find this interview for you. She mentioned it again recently in an interview on utube!. My apologies for my terrible memory. Not terrible enough that I didn't remember what she said though.....I would encourage you to look.her up. She is a powerhouse of information with a very interesting history working for HUD under Bush. She saw 1 trillion go missing every year in that department with no accountability.
A Bill perhaps. Bill 56? 54, 55 ....somewhere around that. I have heard her mention it more than once. I know Catherine Austin Fits would not lie. It's my fault for not having the right terminology