I noted these data you present diverge from the UK reported data in Table 3 for "Age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person-years" which show 2438.3 for unvaccinated and 940.2 for ever vaccinated. Any idea what the factors are in their reported figure?
Seems strange to have such a divergence between what yo…
I noted these data you present diverge from the UK reported data in Table 3 for "Age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person-years" which show 2438.3 for unvaccinated and 940.2 for ever vaccinated. Any idea what the factors are in their reported figure?
Seems strange to have such a divergence between what you calculate... which seem logical, and their figures, which consistently show much higher risks for unvaccinated nonetheless.
I would not pretend to know the thoughts behind this report or any other.
one explanation might be - the mortality rate for ALL ages does not take into account the age of the person, if you add all the young people under 5 that were not vaccinated and take into account that children rarely die then the results would be different.
another clear option is - that the data was manipulated.
I tried to do sum up of years and death at table 6 for 10-14 age group and it looks like the unvaccinated had considerably more death - but not from covid. it is as if, magically, vaccinated kids would not die of car accidents any more :)
Either I am reading this thing completely wrong, or the data is wrong, or the data have been manipulated.
In reading more... it appears they are using an AGE-YEARS figure to "adjust" the figures. All the tables have this adjustment... I didn't read all the details.
I'm hoping to find some correlation to success rates vs. vaccination rates of the population - basically reducing the impacts of the unvaxxed being only 27% and vaxxed being about 73%. Thanks!
the problem is more complex as a person can be unvaxxed for three months of the year, after one shot, then 2 then three for the second half of the year.
Interesting and helpful!
I noted these data you present diverge from the UK reported data in Table 3 for "Age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person-years" which show 2438.3 for unvaccinated and 940.2 for ever vaccinated. Any idea what the factors are in their reported figure?
Seems strange to have such a divergence between what you calculate... which seem logical, and their figures, which consistently show much higher risks for unvaccinated nonetheless.
I would not pretend to know the thoughts behind this report or any other.
one explanation might be - the mortality rate for ALL ages does not take into account the age of the person, if you add all the young people under 5 that were not vaccinated and take into account that children rarely die then the results would be different.
another clear option is - that the data was manipulated.
I tried to do sum up of years and death at table 6 for 10-14 age group and it looks like the unvaccinated had considerably more death - but not from covid. it is as if, magically, vaccinated kids would not die of car accidents any more :)
Either I am reading this thing completely wrong, or the data is wrong, or the data have been manipulated.
In reading more... it appears they are using an AGE-YEARS figure to "adjust" the figures. All the tables have this adjustment... I didn't read all the details.
I'm hoping to find some correlation to success rates vs. vaccination rates of the population - basically reducing the impacts of the unvaxxed being only 27% and vaxxed being about 73%. Thanks!
the problem is more complex as a person can be unvaxxed for three months of the year, after one shot, then 2 then three for the second half of the year.