The whole issue is more complicated than what you are saying.
The virus theory as defined is wrong and full of holes. Transmission was never proven it was disproven though.
The viral particles excreted by our bodies are misunderstood as something contagious.
We need to reconsider the whole notion and do some proper unbiased research but …
The whole issue is more complicated than what you are saying.
The virus theory as defined is wrong and full of holes. Transmission was never proven it was disproven though.
The viral particles excreted by our bodies are misunderstood as something contagious.
We need to reconsider the whole notion and do some proper unbiased research but no one is interested in truth, viral disease theory generates billions, terrain theory being finally proved as truth that it is would end this whole business.
This is the crux of the topic, monetary benefit between the theories.
So don't dismiss something Steve you can't disprove just because people can't tell you definitively what is what.
We don't know because no one tried to even find out the truth, it was banned topic since Pasteur got his way and vaccines came to be.
If we examine facts on both ends the terrain theory makes more sense and has more direct proof and logic than the viral theory.
This is the problem.
And why do virologists are so cagey about their theory?
Well I have read multiple studies about viruses and they are all poorly written and full of "we believe" "we think" , no real proof of anything.
And testing things in vitro does NOT translate to in vivo environments at all so they can make up stuff all they want in labs but that does not mean it's transferable to the body environment.
We have good grounds to believe that viral particles are basically effects of body detoxing.
The particles being either directly waste or as mentioned by some solvents to dissolve toxic tissue.
Exosomes play a role in this as well and there are plenty of new theories about them.
We are beeing fooled and anyone who believes in viruses with no critical thought is just a cultist with no factual data we could verify.
Data and experimentation on real humans, not petridishes is key here.
So far the viral transmission theory is junk, otherwise we would all be dead from rona 2 years ago kids.
So think about it before you bash it.
Something is not adding up in viral theory.
We just don't know how to put a finger on it deffinitively.
We know a healthy , well nourished body is immune to most diseases , healthy people don't get sick even when around sick people. How is that possible?
If we have a nature's given immune system, why vaccines?
There are many questions here Steve and I see you are basically trying to close off debate on this very crucial bit of Swiss cheese.
This is not honest, scientific or beneficial.
This is a form of censoring ideas we don't want to debate.
The whole issue is more complicated than what you are saying.
The virus theory as defined is wrong and full of holes. Transmission was never proven it was disproven though.
The viral particles excreted by our bodies are misunderstood as something contagious.
We need to reconsider the whole notion and do some proper unbiased research but no one is interested in truth, viral disease theory generates billions, terrain theory being finally proved as truth that it is would end this whole business.
This is the crux of the topic, monetary benefit between the theories.
So don't dismiss something Steve you can't disprove just because people can't tell you definitively what is what.
We don't know because no one tried to even find out the truth, it was banned topic since Pasteur got his way and vaccines came to be.
If we examine facts on both ends the terrain theory makes more sense and has more direct proof and logic than the viral theory.
This is the problem.
And why do virologists are so cagey about their theory?
Well I have read multiple studies about viruses and they are all poorly written and full of "we believe" "we think" , no real proof of anything.
And testing things in vitro does NOT translate to in vivo environments at all so they can make up stuff all they want in labs but that does not mean it's transferable to the body environment.
We have good grounds to believe that viral particles are basically effects of body detoxing.
The particles being either directly waste or as mentioned by some solvents to dissolve toxic tissue.
Exosomes play a role in this as well and there are plenty of new theories about them.
We are beeing fooled and anyone who believes in viruses with no critical thought is just a cultist with no factual data we could verify.
Data and experimentation on real humans, not petridishes is key here.
So far the viral transmission theory is junk, otherwise we would all be dead from rona 2 years ago kids.
So think about it before you bash it.
Something is not adding up in viral theory.
We just don't know how to put a finger on it deffinitively.
We know a healthy , well nourished body is immune to most diseases , healthy people don't get sick even when around sick people. How is that possible?
If we have a nature's given immune system, why vaccines?
There are many questions here Steve and I see you are basically trying to close off debate on this very crucial bit of Swiss cheese.
This is not honest, scientific or beneficial.
This is a form of censoring ideas we don't want to debate.