1 Comment
β­  Return to thread

Thank you Lawrence, you're very kind. Yep, I know, virtually EVERY channel & forum "big & ugly" enough to merit inclusion within the poisoned chalice of the appellation-

"mainstream" media, purporting to expound upon "current affairs", from the poisonous presstitutes in print, to the so called "fact"-checkers (hack-checkers, fact-wreckers, fact-chokers, fuct-checkers, ad infinitum) within the murky, censorious environs of the technocratic corporatocracy's tentacular appendages of antisocial

media, have virtually ALL now become (assuming that there were ever ANY that WEREN'T, from their very inception, institutionally corrupt) lying deceivers, wholly bought and paid for, egregious purveyors of at best, highly skewed interpretations of events, half truths, "malinformation", misinformation, but more commonly- visibly transparent bargain basement social engineers, psychological conditioners, utilising techniques of Neuro Linguistic Programming, Agenda setting, situational design, rabid, jingoistic, psychotic sloganeering and propagandist predictive programming, and applied, conscious, wilful disinformation. Nowadays, I must admit, I often find

an unintended sneer of contempt & disgust begin to crack my otherwise

handsome visage when, in a shop, or bus, or street, I overhear one of the pitchfork wielding villagers and feckless, facile, vapid, vacant, bovine, credulous, gullible stupefied dupes of the mindless moron-mobs and sheeple πŸ‘ utter the words- "it said on the 'news' last night that- ".

As if ANY of THOSE liars and channels of state propaganda constituted the "rubber stamp" of verifiable objective reality!? Sadly, & infuriatingly, for millions of simple souls across the world- they DO😑!!

"Darling, do you think we should have the children jabbed with the dangerous, experimental, gene 🧬 altering military prototype??", "I don't know, dear?? What does The Guardian think about it? What was it paedo-phil and Holly said on This Morning the other day??, "πŸ€” Hmm?

I'm going to "giggle"-search it dear. Giggle and Wikki-ed pedia will give us a solid set of accurate, impartial, objective & empirical sound medical

opinion & data!!πŸ‘!". Cue my slow, ironic handclap πŸ‘. Even if someone were to operate from the basis of their unwitting confirmation biases & cognitive imprinting, as far as scam-demic goes, one such of the wholly paranoid, "went TOO far" conspiracy theorist, "EVERYTHING they tell us is

LIES!! (etc) tendency to outright paranoid psychosis, would STILL have turned out to be 100% RIGHT about ALL of their "paranoid" conspiratorial, mental-meanderings!!! The 5G connection, R.F.I.D. chips or "tech" to "spy" on us in there, Gates pays 'em & they write

HIS garbage πŸ—‘οΈ as "news", & so in, & so on! What a sad, sad, sad state of affairs. I'd wager that people 50yrs ago, 100, 200(!!) had more natural, environmental intelligence than US, with all our technologies, and fact-chokers, and smug "information age". There can be NO dispute now that a verrrrrry LARGE section of global society HAVE now become the unwitting victims of their πŸ₯„ spoon fed confirmation biases and the applied cognitive dissonance put on 'em, resulting in such an evident mass formation psychosis!!

And all it took for these urbane, sophisticated, "well" informed, rather 'civilised' sorts to become this way? Scare tactics. Repitition. OBVIOUS lying INSISTED upon by "responsible" people in positions of power and influence to the extent of having the effect of moral/emotional "blackmail" whereby it'd have been felt to be callous, indifferent, even "unpatriotic" to go AGAINST the prevailing narrative and the mindless, mulling, moron masses propping it up. After all, (& THIS one was KEY!) it would've been IMPOSSIBLE to have managed to have ALL of these "experts" & "scientists" & "politicians", and clinicians & physicians & doctors & nurses & health authorities/bodies &

journalists & "computer models" to ALL have been "in on it" regarding THE greatest DECEPTION & CULL in ALL of human history!! Right........??

Why even BOTHER to do one's OWN

investigations into ANY of it?? It ISN'T POSSIBLE for it all to have been anything OTHER than what it's

been represented as, right...........?? I'd

look like a damn FOOL & a "bad".person, should I give voice to ANY lil' niggling doubt about ANY of the daily dump of deceptions shown us. There are many whose ability to see truth is hamstrung from the very start because they CANNOT, they WILL NOT ever concede that the "news", "newspapers", BBC, (etc) could EVER wilfuly LIE to them, and back to the ole "& something SOOooo BIG

a lie could NEVER be pulled off, could it.......??

Expand full comment