About showing grace to those who unwittingly recommended the jabs: Yes, I think there is room for an important degree of understanding and forgiveness, however not for those who insisted on riding roughshod over other peoples' rights, that is, those who engaged in attacking, shaming and excluding from wo…
About showing grace to those who unwittingly recommended the jabs: Yes, I think there is room for an important degree of understanding and forgiveness, however not for those who insisted on riding roughshod over other peoples' rights, that is, those who engaged in attacking, shaming and excluding from work, school, restaurants, gyms, theaters & etc & etc those individuals who wanted to take their own decisions for their own health.
Specifically, the indviduals who deliberately censored information about pharmaceutical company fraud, and about adverse events including deaths and the numbers and nature of injuries, and also those who mandated this experimental gene juice shot, whether they be in the public sector or the private sector, should be held accountable before the law. And harshly. Many people were traumatized by Jab Crow, whether they took the shots or refused. As we all well know, for many people, the personal and financial consequences of not complying were drastic, even horrific. And many people who took those shots were killed, and millions more ended up injured, some with extremely serious debilities.
In the USA we have a Constitution, it includes a Bill of Rights, no exemptions for epidemics.
But there's nuance, of course, it's not one-size-fits all when it comes to those who promoted the jabs. For example, my friend with a masters in public health from a top university who urged her entire family to get the shots-- she even drove some of the reluctant young adults to a public vax clinic held in a parking lot-- she did not violate the Constitution. She gets to live with herself. (That is, once she figures out she's been duped-- and I am not at all not sure that that will ever happen). She never did insist on mandates or anything Jab Crow, bless her heart, and I therefore believe that she deserves understanding and grace. I cannot say that I would ever trust anything she has to say about public health, however, I can accept that she did her honest best in the situation, and I hold her in my heart. I do believe that there is profound wisdom in the Lord's Prayer.
Thanks for this, JethrineBeauDean.
About showing grace to those who unwittingly recommended the jabs: Yes, I think there is room for an important degree of understanding and forgiveness, however not for those who insisted on riding roughshod over other peoples' rights, that is, those who engaged in attacking, shaming and excluding from work, school, restaurants, gyms, theaters & etc & etc those individuals who wanted to take their own decisions for their own health.
Specifically, the indviduals who deliberately censored information about pharmaceutical company fraud, and about adverse events including deaths and the numbers and nature of injuries, and also those who mandated this experimental gene juice shot, whether they be in the public sector or the private sector, should be held accountable before the law. And harshly. Many people were traumatized by Jab Crow, whether they took the shots or refused. As we all well know, for many people, the personal and financial consequences of not complying were drastic, even horrific. And many people who took those shots were killed, and millions more ended up injured, some with extremely serious debilities.
In the USA we have a Constitution, it includes a Bill of Rights, no exemptions for epidemics.
But there's nuance, of course, it's not one-size-fits all when it comes to those who promoted the jabs. For example, my friend with a masters in public health from a top university who urged her entire family to get the shots-- she even drove some of the reluctant young adults to a public vax clinic held in a parking lot-- she did not violate the Constitution. She gets to live with herself. (That is, once she figures out she's been duped-- and I am not at all not sure that that will ever happen). She never did insist on mandates or anything Jab Crow, bless her heart, and I therefore believe that she deserves understanding and grace. I cannot say that I would ever trust anything she has to say about public health, however, I can accept that she did her honest best in the situation, and I hold her in my heart. I do believe that there is profound wisdom in the Lord's Prayer.