If you have a moment, Steve, can you please comment on this study? “Assessment of Risk For Sudden Cardiac Death Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Receipt of Covid19 Vaccine— Oregon June 2021-December 2022.” Liko, J & Cieslak, P; MMWR, April 11 2024; 73(14); 317-320.
If you have a moment, Steve, can you please comment on this study? “Assessment of Risk For Sudden Cardiac Death Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Receipt of Covid19 Vaccine— Oregon June 2021-December 2022.” Liko, J & Cieslak, P; MMWR, April 11 2024; 73(14); 317-320.
Supposedly the researchers wanted to discover if the jab was actually killing young people. Detailing the innumerable tricks and sleights of hand they used to launder the data would require a more extensive paper than they published themselves. There is so much here I must skip because, indeed, my goal is to condense and give highlights.
The researchers do admit that Oregon’s overall cardiac mortality among 15- to 34-year-olds increased from 2.9 deaths per 100,000 in 2019 to 4.1 deaths in 2021. If the researchers weren’t grifters and liars, having been allowed to look at data that is hidden from the public and other researchers, they would have closely analyzed the overall death rates of the jabbed vs. the unjabbed. But they preferred to obfuscate and mislead. For example, they took data from one time frame and then their discussion revolved around a different time frame altogether. Within their paper, they frequently conflated myocarditis mortality (none) with all cardiac mortality (a lot). They treated the data as if they were magicians running a card trick in which they finally revealed a pre-chosen card while maintaining the illusion the card was strictly played by chance. In such a way, they breezily set aside, without discussion, most of the 1,292 cardiac deaths they found in the database (in what already appeared to be a very limited search).
Of the remaining 40 deaths, they excluded any poor soul who died outside their 100-day window, leaving only three deaths to explain away. I will conclude with the only particulars the researchers presented for 1,292 dead Oregonians:
“The first death was recorded as having occurred in a natural manner 21 days after COVID-19 vaccination. The immediate cause of death noted on the death certificate was congestive heart failure attributed to hypertension; other significant conditions included morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea. The second decedent had received a COVID-19 vaccine dose 45 days before the date of death; the cause of death was recorded as “undetermined natural cause.” The [third] decedent died 4 days after COVID-19 vaccination. The manner of death was recorded as natural, and the immediate cause was listed as undetermined but as a consequence of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia attributed to mitral stenosis.”
If you have a moment, Steve, can you please comment on this study? “Assessment of Risk For Sudden Cardiac Death Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Receipt of Covid19 Vaccine— Oregon June 2021-December 2022.” Liko, J & Cieslak, P; MMWR, April 11 2024; 73(14); 317-320.
Supposedly the researchers wanted to discover if the jab was actually killing young people. Detailing the innumerable tricks and sleights of hand they used to launder the data would require a more extensive paper than they published themselves. There is so much here I must skip because, indeed, my goal is to condense and give highlights.
The researchers do admit that Oregon’s overall cardiac mortality among 15- to 34-year-olds increased from 2.9 deaths per 100,000 in 2019 to 4.1 deaths in 2021. If the researchers weren’t grifters and liars, having been allowed to look at data that is hidden from the public and other researchers, they would have closely analyzed the overall death rates of the jabbed vs. the unjabbed. But they preferred to obfuscate and mislead. For example, they took data from one time frame and then their discussion revolved around a different time frame altogether. Within their paper, they frequently conflated myocarditis mortality (none) with all cardiac mortality (a lot). They treated the data as if they were magicians running a card trick in which they finally revealed a pre-chosen card while maintaining the illusion the card was strictly played by chance. In such a way, they breezily set aside, without discussion, most of the 1,292 cardiac deaths they found in the database (in what already appeared to be a very limited search).
Of the remaining 40 deaths, they excluded any poor soul who died outside their 100-day window, leaving only three deaths to explain away. I will conclude with the only particulars the researchers presented for 1,292 dead Oregonians:
“The first death was recorded as having occurred in a natural manner 21 days after COVID-19 vaccination. The immediate cause of death noted on the death certificate was congestive heart failure attributed to hypertension; other significant conditions included morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea. The second decedent had received a COVID-19 vaccine dose 45 days before the date of death; the cause of death was recorded as “undetermined natural cause.” The [third] decedent died 4 days after COVID-19 vaccination. The manner of death was recorded as natural, and the immediate cause was listed as undetermined but as a consequence of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia attributed to mitral stenosis.”
Thank you, Victoria!