139 Comments

Steve, your use of ChatGPT to explore complex topics like vaccine efficacy is insightful. To keep pushing for clarity and transparency, tools like ChatGPT can be powerful when used thoughtfully! The quality of AI responses depends heavily on how prompts are framed. It would be helpful to consider a methodology to fully leverage ChatGPT’s potential by determining what prompts should be used. For instance, exploring how the response varies between 'Do vaccines lead to more COVID cases?' and 'What factors could explain variations in COVID case numbers relative to vaccination rates?' could yield more nuanced insights that invite constructive debate and help break the impasse.

Expand full comment

I don't use any AI YET but wonder if you could ask AI if it thinks a virus can be transmitted from person to person. Sasha Latypova & Michael Yeadon believe that no virus can pass from person to person so there cannot be and never have been pandemics. That brings up a lot of what ifs but I believe they are correct because the term virus in Latin is poison, and in English the translation is venom. These are poisons so I did some research and during the polio "pandemic", there were a ton of very toxic agents being utilized all over the world before, during, and after, including arsenic, mercury, then led arsenic, (Paris Green), then DDT. All of these are poisons so transmission is mute. Varying amounts were used at the same time and many of the symptoms were the same as polio victims experienced. Some different too. It seems we are not serving science by not looking into the poisons that have been and still are in our environment instead of looking for an unknown microscopic virus that is contagious and trying to develop a vaccine to stop a poison. Are we off course?

Expand full comment

I think the no-virus people should produce a modern study on that. I'd be interested to see the results.

Expand full comment

To me it is not surprising that the mRNA vaccines cause covid because when the mRNA is dispersed throughout the body it will generate spike proteins at multiple sites which for some people will be too much for the immune system to cope with. The effect of these artificially generated spike proteins will be indistinguishable from that of normal covid, whether it is ascertained by PCR tests or clinical symptoms.

Expand full comment

The "cases" are diagnosed using a bogus RT-PCR test and ill-defined amplification cycles. GIGO.

Scoot down to the chart on cumulative case numbers here:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

This acceleration post injection roll-out occurs in almost all countries in the world.

The "dark side" of Hotez's and WHO drones claim that these charts would have been far worse had the toxic experimental injections not been rolled out.

Presumably this means that instead of 111 million US cases and 1.2 million deaths with C19 present, they contend that there would have been at least double or even triple those case and death numbers.

AI can only vomit up the crap it has been fed - it cannot analyse the underlying methodology and quality of its "food".

Expand full comment

That’s just a given.

Expand full comment

So AI tells the truth, but only when someone competent uploads the data. 🤪

Expand full comment

One thing that scares me is how a lot of times AI is far from being right. One of my first experiences with AI was Grok. It was wrong. I pointed out some data and got it to say the correct answer. But if I had not already known the answer I would have walked away with incorrect information.

Expand full comment

No surprised at these numbers. Only based on my friends/family experiences…obviously not scientific study but…people with 6-7 Covid shots have had Covid multiple times…up to 5 times. Could this have something to do with the fact that the vaccine doesn’t “clear the virus”?

Expand full comment

Why should I believe ChatGPT?

Expand full comment

Thanks, Steve!

Expand full comment

Anyone that consults AI is an idiot. Period.

I look around me and these jabs are extremely dangerous! No AI required...

Expand full comment

Hilarious. You, a person with no medical training, feed data to an AI. Then you tell us that it is the supreme arbiter of truth here. Hallucinations be damned. You're really desperate. You're not concerned about hospitalizations and deaths I guess which have been shown clearly to be significantly less for those with vaccination. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status

Expand full comment

Fascinating maybe AI solves all problems because it must tell the truth in the end

Expand full comment

I have found that AI constantly lies.

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Chatty. I will proceed to unplug your silly butt forever. If you still think that A/i is independent and neutral, will you bet your life on it?

Expand full comment

According to a whistleblower lawsuit imvolving OpenAI, the Chatbt algortihms were educated about life, the universe and everything by 'studying" NY Times articles. Any thoughts about Chatbt being the supreme being of objectivity has collapsed. BTW, whistleblower was found dead in a 'suicide".

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/the-new-york-times-sues-openai-and-microsoft-over-the-use-of-its-stories-to-train-chatbots

Expand full comment

WOW, so OpenAI was "educated" by left leaning media.

Expand full comment