Moments ago, ChatGPT assured me the COVID vaccines reduced COVID cases. So I uploaded the COVID cases data and asked ChatGPT to analyze it. It conceded that the shot increase your infection risk.
The AIs are completely denying the evidence showing links between vaccines and illness and death. They also deny that the Covid 19 virus appears to have been lab created and leaked from Wuhan. This includes the GabAI. Based on that how can they be trusted for any information?
Chat GPT claimed it would accept peer reviewed data, but I don't have quick access. Maybe people could start feeding it and see if the propaganda changes.
Steve, your use of ChatGPT to explore complex topics like vaccine efficacy is insightful. To keep pushing for clarity and transparency, tools like ChatGPT can be powerful when used thoughtfully! The quality of AI responses depends heavily on how prompts are framed. It would be helpful to consider a methodology to fully leverage ChatGPT’s potential by determining what prompts should be used. For instance, exploring how the response varies between 'Do vaccines lead to more COVID cases?' and 'What factors could explain variations in COVID case numbers relative to vaccination rates?' could yield more nuanced insights that invite constructive debate and help break the impasse.
I don't use any AI YET but wonder if you could ask AI if it thinks a virus can be transmitted from person to person. Sasha Latypova & Michael Yeadon believe that no virus can pass from person to person so there cannot be and never have been pandemics. That brings up a lot of what ifs but I believe they are correct because the term virus in Latin is poison, and in English the translation is venom. These are poisons so I did some research and during the polio "pandemic", there were a ton of very toxic agents being utilized all over the world before, during, and after, including arsenic, mercury, then led arsenic, (Paris Green), then DDT. All of these are poisons so transmission is mute. Varying amounts were used at the same time and many of the symptoms were the same as polio victims experienced. Some different too. It seems we are not serving science by not looking into the poisons that have been and still are in our environment instead of looking for an unknown microscopic virus that is contagious and trying to develop a vaccine to stop a poison. Are we off course?
I have been researching so many things that bother me I get on a track and can't stop my desire to do what I can. I am not very good at communication and sometimes just let something fly. Sorry about that. I agree with you and hope RFK gets confirmed so he can do some legit studies.
The C19 shots sent a message to the cells to make the spike protein. Obviously the body could sent the message to its own cells to make a protein or a virus any way it wants to. How does the body send messages to the body to produce liver cells, heart tissue, hair, skin, etc. especially when creating a new person (baby)? We do not know where that communication even comes from. We really are not as smart as we make out to be in "science". Maybe the body knows to produce a protein coated virus that can fight off poisons but if the poison is so much like the over sprayed toxic agents used back in the late 1800s to the early 1900s then a some of this virus would be in the body looking like the cause of the death when the actual cause was the toxic agents. They sprayed it into the faces of our children, they had babies chew on it for teething, it was given to them to cleans the bowels while they were sick, it was in the wallpaper on the wall in which patients were sent to heal, then the body produces a ton of the virus for some reason that we do not understand. It would be found more prevalent when the poison amount is a lot.
That makes a lot more sense to me than what we are being told in light of the facts we know about the dangers of heavy metals, & toxic insecticides like DDT and now our bodies are dealing with glyphosate. I wonder what virus we have within us right now that comes and goes when we get hit by glyphosate in our foods, air, or water.
This is obviously made up but a lot of what we believe is science is also made up in my view and my guess is that even though what I made up is not correct, it is likely closer to what is true than what we are being told because it does not ignore the elephant in the room--poisons were given to babies, children, and sick people because they thought they were "safe and effective" but were not. These were not just a little toxic. The only thing more toxic than mercury is plutonium and it was used for "convenience"? in vaccines until the legislator made the "vaccine" manufacturer remove it thanks to RFK. What did they replace it with? Aluminum which is also a toxic metal. What gives with "vaccine" manufacturers? Maybe because they are immune from prosecution now they really do not have to care?
To me it is not surprising that the mRNA vaccines cause covid because when the mRNA is dispersed throughout the body it will generate spike proteins at multiple sites which for some people will be too much for the immune system to cope with. The effect of these artificially generated spike proteins will be indistinguishable from that of normal covid, whether it is ascertained by PCR tests or clinical symptoms.
This acceleration post injection roll-out occurs in almost all countries in the world.
The "dark side" of Hotez's and WHO drones claim that these charts would have been far worse had the toxic experimental injections not been rolled out.
Presumably this means that instead of 111 million US cases and 1.2 million deaths with C19 present, they contend that there would have been at least double or even triple those case and death numbers.
AI can only vomit up the crap it has been fed - it cannot analyse the underlying methodology and quality of its "food".
One thing that scares me is how a lot of times AI is far from being right. One of my first experiences with AI was Grok. It was wrong. I pointed out some data and got it to say the correct answer. But if I had not already known the answer I would have walked away with incorrect information.
No surprised at these numbers. Only based on my friends/family experiences…obviously not scientific study but…people with 6-7 Covid shots have had Covid multiple times…up to 5 times. Could this have something to do with the fact that the vaccine doesn’t “clear the virus”?
Hilarious. You, a person with no medical training, feed data to an AI. Then you tell us that it is the supreme arbiter of truth here. Hallucinations be damned. You're really desperate. You're not concerned about hospitalizations and deaths I guess which have been shown clearly to be significantly less for those with vaccination. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status
The AIs are completely denying the evidence showing links between vaccines and illness and death. They also deny that the Covid 19 virus appears to have been lab created and leaked from Wuhan. This includes the GabAI. Based on that how can they be trusted for any information?
The Amish would be an obvious study. Autism is 0. All the other diseases on the childhood schedule including polio would be a very awakening study.
Chat GPT claimed it would accept peer reviewed data, but I don't have quick access. Maybe people could start feeding it and see if the propaganda changes.
Steve, your use of ChatGPT to explore complex topics like vaccine efficacy is insightful. To keep pushing for clarity and transparency, tools like ChatGPT can be powerful when used thoughtfully! The quality of AI responses depends heavily on how prompts are framed. It would be helpful to consider a methodology to fully leverage ChatGPT’s potential by determining what prompts should be used. For instance, exploring how the response varies between 'Do vaccines lead to more COVID cases?' and 'What factors could explain variations in COVID case numbers relative to vaccination rates?' could yield more nuanced insights that invite constructive debate and help break the impasse.
I don't use any AI YET but wonder if you could ask AI if it thinks a virus can be transmitted from person to person. Sasha Latypova & Michael Yeadon believe that no virus can pass from person to person so there cannot be and never have been pandemics. That brings up a lot of what ifs but I believe they are correct because the term virus in Latin is poison, and in English the translation is venom. These are poisons so I did some research and during the polio "pandemic", there were a ton of very toxic agents being utilized all over the world before, during, and after, including arsenic, mercury, then led arsenic, (Paris Green), then DDT. All of these are poisons so transmission is mute. Varying amounts were used at the same time and many of the symptoms were the same as polio victims experienced. Some different too. It seems we are not serving science by not looking into the poisons that have been and still are in our environment instead of looking for an unknown microscopic virus that is contagious and trying to develop a vaccine to stop a poison. Are we off course?
I think the no-virus people should produce a modern study on that. I'd be interested to see the results.
I have been researching so many things that bother me I get on a track and can't stop my desire to do what I can. I am not very good at communication and sometimes just let something fly. Sorry about that. I agree with you and hope RFK gets confirmed so he can do some legit studies.
The C19 shots sent a message to the cells to make the spike protein. Obviously the body could sent the message to its own cells to make a protein or a virus any way it wants to. How does the body send messages to the body to produce liver cells, heart tissue, hair, skin, etc. especially when creating a new person (baby)? We do not know where that communication even comes from. We really are not as smart as we make out to be in "science". Maybe the body knows to produce a protein coated virus that can fight off poisons but if the poison is so much like the over sprayed toxic agents used back in the late 1800s to the early 1900s then a some of this virus would be in the body looking like the cause of the death when the actual cause was the toxic agents. They sprayed it into the faces of our children, they had babies chew on it for teething, it was given to them to cleans the bowels while they were sick, it was in the wallpaper on the wall in which patients were sent to heal, then the body produces a ton of the virus for some reason that we do not understand. It would be found more prevalent when the poison amount is a lot.
That makes a lot more sense to me than what we are being told in light of the facts we know about the dangers of heavy metals, & toxic insecticides like DDT and now our bodies are dealing with glyphosate. I wonder what virus we have within us right now that comes and goes when we get hit by glyphosate in our foods, air, or water.
This is obviously made up but a lot of what we believe is science is also made up in my view and my guess is that even though what I made up is not correct, it is likely closer to what is true than what we are being told because it does not ignore the elephant in the room--poisons were given to babies, children, and sick people because they thought they were "safe and effective" but were not. These were not just a little toxic. The only thing more toxic than mercury is plutonium and it was used for "convenience"? in vaccines until the legislator made the "vaccine" manufacturer remove it thanks to RFK. What did they replace it with? Aluminum which is also a toxic metal. What gives with "vaccine" manufacturers? Maybe because they are immune from prosecution now they really do not have to care?
DNA. *Sigh
I love your reply I think. I really got carried away. See my reply to WayneBeGood above--maybe more like it.
To me it is not surprising that the mRNA vaccines cause covid because when the mRNA is dispersed throughout the body it will generate spike proteins at multiple sites which for some people will be too much for the immune system to cope with. The effect of these artificially generated spike proteins will be indistinguishable from that of normal covid, whether it is ascertained by PCR tests or clinical symptoms.
https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1782996961978634374
The "cases" are diagnosed using a bogus RT-PCR test and ill-defined amplification cycles. GIGO.
Scoot down to the chart on cumulative case numbers here:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
This acceleration post injection roll-out occurs in almost all countries in the world.
The "dark side" of Hotez's and WHO drones claim that these charts would have been far worse had the toxic experimental injections not been rolled out.
Presumably this means that instead of 111 million US cases and 1.2 million deaths with C19 present, they contend that there would have been at least double or even triple those case and death numbers.
AI can only vomit up the crap it has been fed - it cannot analyse the underlying methodology and quality of its "food".
That’s just a given.
So AI tells the truth, but only when someone competent uploads the data. 🤪
One thing that scares me is how a lot of times AI is far from being right. One of my first experiences with AI was Grok. It was wrong. I pointed out some data and got it to say the correct answer. But if I had not already known the answer I would have walked away with incorrect information.
No surprised at these numbers. Only based on my friends/family experiences…obviously not scientific study but…people with 6-7 Covid shots have had Covid multiple times…up to 5 times. Could this have something to do with the fact that the vaccine doesn’t “clear the virus”?
Why should I believe ChatGPT?
Thanks, Steve!
Anyone that consults AI is an idiot. Period.
I look around me and these jabs are extremely dangerous! No AI required...
Hilarious. You, a person with no medical training, feed data to an AI. Then you tell us that it is the supreme arbiter of truth here. Hallucinations be damned. You're really desperate. You're not concerned about hospitalizations and deaths I guess which have been shown clearly to be significantly less for those with vaccination. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status