6 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I don't use any AI YET but wonder if you could ask AI if it thinks a virus can be transmitted from person to person. Sasha Latypova & Michael Yeadon believe that no virus can pass from person to person so there cannot be and never have been pandemics. That brings up a lot of what ifs but I believe they are correct because the term virus in Latin is poison, and in English the translation is venom. These are poisons so I did some research and during the polio "pandemic", there were a ton of very toxic agents being utilized all over the world before, during, and after, including arsenic, mercury, then led arsenic, (Paris Green), then DDT. All of these are poisons so transmission is mute. Varying amounts were used at the same time and many of the symptoms were the same as polio victims experienced. Some different too. It seems we are not serving science by not looking into the poisons that have been and still are in our environment instead of looking for an unknown microscopic virus that is contagious and trying to develop a vaccine to stop a poison. Are we off course?

Expand full comment

I think the no-virus people should produce a modern study on that. I'd be interested to see the results.

Expand full comment

I have been researching so many things that bother me I get on a track and can't stop my desire to do what I can. I am not very good at communication and sometimes just let something fly. Sorry about that. I agree with you and hope RFK gets confirmed so he can do some legit studies.

Expand full comment

The C19 shots sent a message to the cells to make the spike protein. Obviously the body could sent the message to its own cells to make a protein or a virus any way it wants to. How does the body send messages to the body to produce liver cells, heart tissue, hair, skin, etc. especially when creating a new person (baby)? We do not know where that communication even comes from. We really are not as smart as we make out to be in "science". Maybe the body knows to produce a protein coated virus that can fight off poisons but if the poison is so much like the over sprayed toxic agents used back in the late 1800s to the early 1900s then a some of this virus would be in the body looking like the cause of the death when the actual cause was the toxic agents. They sprayed it into the faces of our children, they had babies chew on it for teething, it was given to them to cleans the bowels while they were sick, it was in the wallpaper on the wall in which patients were sent to heal, then the body produces a ton of the virus for some reason that we do not understand. It would be found more prevalent when the poison amount is a lot.

That makes a lot more sense to me than what we are being told in light of the facts we know about the dangers of heavy metals, & toxic insecticides like DDT and now our bodies are dealing with glyphosate. I wonder what virus we have within us right now that comes and goes when we get hit by glyphosate in our foods, air, or water.

This is obviously made up but a lot of what we believe is science is also made up in my view and my guess is that even though what I made up is not correct, it is likely closer to what is true than what we are being told because it does not ignore the elephant in the room--poisons were given to babies, children, and sick people because they thought they were "safe and effective" but were not. These were not just a little toxic. The only thing more toxic than mercury is plutonium and it was used for "convenience"? in vaccines until the legislator made the "vaccine" manufacturer remove it thanks to RFK. What did they replace it with? Aluminum which is also a toxic metal. What gives with "vaccine" manufacturers? Maybe because they are immune from prosecution now they really do not have to care?

Expand full comment

DNA. *Sigh

Expand full comment

I love your reply I think. I really got carried away. See my reply to WayneBeGood above--maybe more like it.

Expand full comment