I am taking this approach as well. Negative efficacy has been in the literature for accumulative exposures, and severely after shot 3. I see people with 7 shots in my practice. Explaining toll like receptor suppression, DNA repair impairment (P53 and BRCA) have reduced efficacy by 80 percent in the presence of spike protein, SV40 cancer …
I am taking this approach as well. Negative efficacy has been in the literature for accumulative exposures, and severely after shot 3. I see people with 7 shots in my practice. Explaining toll like receptor suppression, DNA repair impairment (P53 and BRCA) have reduced efficacy by 80 percent in the presence of spike protein, SV40 cancer enhancement, amyloid like clotting in the absence of platelets, VADE..... these are huge scary weird topics to Joe-Public. Finding analogies that make sense to them is tough for the clinician but this is how we fight back. This is how we make them aware. Once small conversation at a time.
I am taking this approach as well. Negative efficacy has been in the literature for accumulative exposures, and severely after shot 3. I see people with 7 shots in my practice. Explaining toll like receptor suppression, DNA repair impairment (P53 and BRCA) have reduced efficacy by 80 percent in the presence of spike protein, SV40 cancer enhancement, amyloid like clotting in the absence of platelets, VADE..... these are huge scary weird topics to Joe-Public. Finding analogies that make sense to them is tough for the clinician but this is how we fight back. This is how we make them aware. Once small conversation at a time.