Here's how they justified the removal and why they got it wrong. If they found an explanation other than the vaccine, why are they keeping it a secret from everyone including the authors?
Thank you for pouncing on this stupidity. Excellent letter. Seems they thought no one would notice their trying to saw off the hindquarters and stuff Jumbo the elephant under the coffee table.
"Most critically, the study conditions entirely on death by including only children who died before age three, which makes it impossible to estimate mortality risk or compare vaccinated and unvaccinated populations".
That sounds reasonable, reject a data set of children who died, as likely those children are weaker than the whole population. They should of course have used a dataset like Traversa of National Centre for Epidemology: their study population consisted of all children who died of SUD between 31 and 729 days of age in the years 1999–2004. Oh wait, ...
I completely agree with your argument that SOMEONE needs to please explain the highly significant and consistent findings in this paper, especially when the effects are clearly cumulative with respect to multiple/combination vaccine exposures.
The one question I have is simply this, why does the study design include only children who died before their 3rd birthday? Why only children who died? Is this because such children had more complete records?
One point I will definitely agree with...the language of the paper does include examples of unnecessarily inflammatory language, such as describing vaccination as "antigenic assault". While I myself do consider vaccination to be an antigenic assault, use of this language is both unnecessary and unfortunate, and I often find myself frustrated with Dr. Hooker's public statements and sometimes even his studies when they include examples of this. I can understand his anger, but language like this only serves to undermine public statements, studies, and our vaccine safety movement in general.
18-month-old twins Dallas and Tyson Shaw receive DTaP, hepatitis A, and influenza vaccines at the same appointment.
April 24, 2025
Both twins become ill and are taken for medical evaluation/ER care. Symptoms reported include lethargy, diarrhea, sunken eyes, and blue/discolored lips. The medical encounter is described in the later federal lawsuit as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
April 30, 2025
Night before the twins’ deaths
Andrea Shaw contacted the twins’ doctor’s office because Dallas and Tyson were still not doing well. Her attorney has stated that Andrea repeatedly sought medical care for the twins in the days leading up to their deaths.
May 1, 2025
Eight days after vaccination, both 18-month-old twins are found dead in their shared bed at their home in Payette, Idaho.
May 2025
Police and medical examiner investigation begins.
May 2025
Andrea Shaw and her husband publicly discuss the twins’ deaths with Children’s Health Defense. Andrea says both children became sick after receiving their vaccines and publicly attributes their deaths to vaccine-related complications.
December 18, 2025
Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash emailed Miller about concerns from “multiple parties” (including potential research errors, methodological issues with VAERS data, and statements on vaccine efficacy). Lash referenced PubPeer comments and requested a response.
2025
The deaths remain under investigation by authorities, including the Payette Police Department and forensic/medical examiner agencies.
2026
January 14, 2026 - Jablonowski/Hooker study “Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations” was withdrawn/removed
January 21, 2026
Andrea Shaw becomes a named plaintiff in a federal RICO lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP):
Shaw et al. v. American Academy of Pediatrics
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Case No. 1:26-cv-00171
The lawsuit centers on allegations concerning the AAP’s representations about childhood vaccine safety. Andrea’s case and the deaths of Dallas and Tyson are included in the RICO lawsuit.
The complaint states that:
• The family had raised concerns about a family history of adverse reactions to influenza vaccination.
• The twins received DTaP, hepatitis A and influenza vaccines on April 23, 2025.
• Both became ill afterward.
• They were taken for medical care the following day.
• Their medical encounter was documented as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
• Both twins died on May 1, 2025.
April 2026
The American Academy of Pediatrics moves to dismiss the federal lawsuit.
April 9, 2026
Elsevier publishing publicly posts a notice that it has initiated an investigation into the 2021 study by Neil Z. Miller examining reports of infant deaths following vaccination in the VAERS database. Elsevier says reported “serious concerns” arrived in 2025.
May 26, 2026
Elsevier publishing removes the 2021 Neil Z. Miller study, “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature,” from its journal Toxicology Reports. The study analyzed 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS and found that 58% occurred within 3 days of vaccination and 78.3% within 7 days. Among reported post-vaccination SIDS cases, 75% occurred within 7 days. The paper argued that the strong clustering of reported deaths shortly after vaccination warranted investigation into whether vaccination could contribute to sudden death in a susceptible subset of infants.
** Why was a five-year-old paper investigated and removed by Lawrence H. Lash at this particular time?
June 2026
The removal of the vaccine/SIDS study becomes a larger public controversy, with questions raised about why the paper was removed and whether the retraction process was scientifically justified.
June 18, 2026
The controversy receives additional attention after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly demands answers concerning the removal of research examining possible associations between vaccination and infant deaths.
June 29, 2026
Payette County grand jury indicts Andrea Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder.
June 29, 2026
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sends a formal letter to Elsevier CEO Kumsal Bayazit and Toxicology Reports Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash demanding records concerning the removal of Neil Z. Miller’s vaccine/SIDS study. Johnson questions why the peer-reviewed paper was removed five years after publication following criticism linked to anonymous PubPeer comments and requests all peer reviews, complaints, communications with Magdalen Wind-Mozley and Neil Miller, communications involving PubPeer, and all records related to the decision to remove the study. He gives Elsevier a deadline of July 14, 2026 to produce the records.
June 30, 2026
Andrea Shaw is arrested.
July 2, 2026
Andrea is arraigned. Bond is set at $2 million.
July 2026
The prosecution publicly alleges that Andrea suffocated both twins.
“They” were getting ahead of the story by removing anything that pointed to death after a vaccination
18-month-old twins Dallas and Tyson Shaw receive DTaP, hepatitis A, and influenza vaccines at the same appointment.
April 24, 2025
Both twins become ill and are taken for medical evaluation/ER care. Symptoms reported include lethargy, diarrhea, sunken eyes, and blue/discolored lips. The medical encounter is described in the later federal lawsuit as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
April 30, 2025
Night before the twins’ deaths
Andrea Shaw contacted the twins’ doctor’s office because Dallas and Tyson were still not doing well. Her attorney has stated that Andrea repeatedly sought medical care for the twins in the days leading up to their deaths.
May 1, 2025
Eight days after vaccination, both 18-month-old twins are found dead in their shared bed at their home in Payette, Idaho.
May 2025
Police and medical examiner investigation begins.
May 2025
Andrea Shaw and her husband publicly discuss the twins’ deaths with Children’s Health Defense. Andrea says both children became sick after receiving their vaccines and publicly attributes their deaths to vaccine-related complications.
December 18, 2025
Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash emailed Miller about concerns from “multiple parties” (including potential research errors, methodological issues with VAERS data, and statements on vaccine efficacy). Lash referenced PubPeer comments and requested a response.
2025
The deaths remain under investigation by authorities, including the Payette Police Department and forensic/medical examiner agencies.
2026
January 14, 2026 - Jablonowski/Hooker study “Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations” was withdrawn/removed
January 21, 2026
Andrea Shaw becomes a named plaintiff in a federal RICO lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP):
Shaw et al. v. American Academy of Pediatrics
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Case No. 1:26-cv-00171
The lawsuit centers on allegations concerning the AAP’s representations about childhood vaccine safety. Andrea’s case and the deaths of Dallas and Tyson are included in the RICO lawsuit.
The complaint states that:
• The family had raised concerns about a family history of adverse reactions to influenza vaccination.
• The twins received DTaP, hepatitis A and influenza vaccines on April 23, 2025.
• Both became ill afterward.
• They were taken for medical care the following day.
• Their medical encounter was documented as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
• Both twins died on May 1, 2025.
April 2026
The American Academy of Pediatrics moves to dismiss the federal lawsuit.
April 9, 2026
Elsevier publishing publicly posts a notice that it has initiated an investigation into the 2021 study by Neil Z. Miller examining reports of infant deaths following vaccination in the VAERS database. Elsevier says reported “serious concerns” arrived in 2025.
May 26, 2026
Elsevier publishing removes the 2021 Neil Z. Miller study, “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature,” from its journal Toxicology Reports. The study analyzed 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS and found that 58% occurred within 3 days of vaccination and 78.3% within 7 days. Among reported post-vaccination SIDS cases, 75% occurred within 7 days. The paper argued that the strong clustering of reported deaths shortly after vaccination warranted investigation into whether vaccination could contribute to sudden death in a susceptible subset of infants.
** Why was a five-year-old paper investigated and removed by Lawrence H. Lash at this particular time?
June 2026
The removal of the vaccine/SIDS study becomes a larger public controversy, with questions raised about why the paper was removed and whether the retraction process was scientifically justified.
June 18, 2026
The controversy receives additional attention after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly demands answers concerning the removal of research examining possible associations between vaccination and infant deaths.
June 29, 2026
Payette County grand jury indicts Andrea Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder.
June 29, 2026
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sends a formal letter to Elsevier CEO Kumsal Bayazit and Toxicology Reports Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash demanding records concerning the removal of Neil Z. Miller’s vaccine/SIDS study. Johnson questions why the peer-reviewed paper was removed five years after publication following criticism linked to anonymous PubPeer comments and requests all peer reviews, complaints, communications with Magdalen Wind-Mozley and Neil Miller, communications involving PubPeer, and all records related to the decision to remove the study. He gives Elsevier a deadline of July 14, 2026 to produce the records.
June 30, 2026
Andrea Shaw is arrested.
July 2, 2026
Andrea is arraigned. Bond is set at $2 million.
July 2026
The prosecution publicly alleges that Andrea suffocated both twins.
“They” were getting ahead of the story by removing anything that pointed to death after a vaccination
Thank you Steve, once again as a digital, computer Data-Scientist, for breaking through the big-Pharma fake 'money' (Greek mnemosis' = 'memory') amnesic Oligarch NOISE of Profit-before-life. The question, which should be occupying all us readers, parents, family & community members is not to endlessly 'decry' this top-down hierarchy, designed-to-fail pharmaceutical death industry.
Humanity's only viable relevant option is to "Become the change we want to see in the world", which Mohandas Gandhi advocated as part of India's 'Swadeshi' (Hindi 'indigenous' aka 'self-sufficiency') movement 1917-47. Through organizing local family, extended family & village self-sufficiency in healthy local whole food, ~!00 (50-150) person multihome Ashram, locally grown plant fibres for spinning & weaving into Khadi clothes & materials, Ayurvedic (plant-based) medicine, local 'economy' (Gk 'oikos' = 'home' + 'namein' = 'care-&-nurture') became stronger. Once a threshold of just 5% diminution of the British Empire (US, Britain, Canada, Australia etc) extractive & exploitive import-export economy had been reached then many 100s of these parasitic corporations went bankrupt & 'Swaraj' (H. 'self-rule') was recognized in 1947.
DO-WE-KNOW-WHO-WE-ARE-? Http://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/d-participatory-structure/9-do-we-know-who-we-are web-based Community-Circular-Economy software for animating personal & group talents, goods, services, resources & dreams. The most effective energy-conservation practice is made by the 70% of people who live in the ~100 (50-150) person Multihome-Dwelling-Complex (eg. Apartment, Townhouse & Village). 20% of Multihome-dwellers are extended-families living intentionally in proximity for social & economic collaboration, contributing 2 trillion $/year of the most individually appropriate goods, services, sharing & caring/year to Turtle-Island/N America in Relational Economy. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy
APPROPRIATE-SCALE CULTURAL ECONOMY FOUNDATION All indigenous humanity kept intimate, intergenerational, female-male, interdisciplinary, critical-mass, economies-of-scale & medical records often lasting millennia in the Multihome. Multihomes should be the 1st Line of nutritional, preventative & restorative Medical intervention by specialists already amongst us treating people proactively & positively in harmony with nature. Multihomes cost 1/3rd per unit, per planning, purchase, operating-costs, heating, financing, repairs, maintenance, management etc. Https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy/1-extending-our-welcome-participatory-multihome-cohousing
My comment concerns the language for your survey, specifically: did preprints.org mistakenly reject the study. I would posit the rejection is not a mistake but a deliberate action to obscure the truth. And I also assume you had to describe it as such to keep from being canceled.
Thank you for continuing to analyze and share your results and conclusions.
NB: The Japanese stopped vaccinating children in their first two years of life -> presto, no SIDS. Duh
Let me connect:
-
Voices for Vaccines is unable explain the huge increase in deaths in young children who were vaccinated compared to their unvaccinated peers
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/voices-for-vaccines-is-unable-explain
They tried to debunk the Hooker paper based on official Louisiana mortality data. They failed. Miserably. In fact, it showed that they are inept.
Steve Kirsch - Jul 14, 2026
Thank you for pouncing on this stupidity. Excellent letter. Seems they thought no one would notice their trying to saw off the hindquarters and stuff Jumbo the elephant under the coffee table.
Let's see... their main objection appears to be:
"Most critically, the study conditions entirely on death by including only children who died before age three, which makes it impossible to estimate mortality risk or compare vaccinated and unvaccinated populations".
That sounds reasonable, reject a data set of children who died, as likely those children are weaker than the whole population. They should of course have used a dataset like Traversa of National Centre for Epidemology: their study population consisted of all children who died of SUD between 31 and 729 days of age in the years 1999–2004. Oh wait, ...
STEVE VERY SAD THAT THOSE WHO TELL THE TRUTH GET SILENCED. AT LEAST THEY GOT THE TRUTH OUT AS WE KNOW IT.
Here come the trolls, but they are easy to spot. We don't get fooled again.
I completely agree with your argument that SOMEONE needs to please explain the highly significant and consistent findings in this paper, especially when the effects are clearly cumulative with respect to multiple/combination vaccine exposures.
The one question I have is simply this, why does the study design include only children who died before their 3rd birthday? Why only children who died? Is this because such children had more complete records?
One point I will definitely agree with...the language of the paper does include examples of unnecessarily inflammatory language, such as describing vaccination as "antigenic assault". While I myself do consider vaccination to be an antigenic assault, use of this language is both unnecessary and unfortunate, and I often find myself frustrated with Dr. Hooker's public statements and sometimes even his studies when they include examples of this. I can understand his anger, but language like this only serves to undermine public statements, studies, and our vaccine safety movement in general.
Look at this overlap
Andrea Shaw / Dallas & Tyson Shaw — Timeline
April 23, 2025
18-month-old twins Dallas and Tyson Shaw receive DTaP, hepatitis A, and influenza vaccines at the same appointment.
April 24, 2025
Both twins become ill and are taken for medical evaluation/ER care. Symptoms reported include lethargy, diarrhea, sunken eyes, and blue/discolored lips. The medical encounter is described in the later federal lawsuit as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
April 30, 2025
Night before the twins’ deaths
Andrea Shaw contacted the twins’ doctor’s office because Dallas and Tyson were still not doing well. Her attorney has stated that Andrea repeatedly sought medical care for the twins in the days leading up to their deaths.
May 1, 2025
Eight days after vaccination, both 18-month-old twins are found dead in their shared bed at their home in Payette, Idaho.
May 2025
Police and medical examiner investigation begins.
May 2025
Andrea Shaw and her husband publicly discuss the twins’ deaths with Children’s Health Defense. Andrea says both children became sick after receiving their vaccines and publicly attributes their deaths to vaccine-related complications.
December 18, 2025
Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash emailed Miller about concerns from “multiple parties” (including potential research errors, methodological issues with VAERS data, and statements on vaccine efficacy). Lash referenced PubPeer comments and requested a response.
2025
The deaths remain under investigation by authorities, including the Payette Police Department and forensic/medical examiner agencies.
2026
January 14, 2026 - Jablonowski/Hooker study “Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations” was withdrawn/removed
January 21, 2026
Andrea Shaw becomes a named plaintiff in a federal RICO lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP):
Shaw et al. v. American Academy of Pediatrics
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Case No. 1:26-cv-00171
The lawsuit centers on allegations concerning the AAP’s representations about childhood vaccine safety. Andrea’s case and the deaths of Dallas and Tyson are included in the RICO lawsuit.
The complaint states that:
• The family had raised concerns about a family history of adverse reactions to influenza vaccination.
• The twins received DTaP, hepatitis A and influenza vaccines on April 23, 2025.
• Both became ill afterward.
• They were taken for medical care the following day.
• Their medical encounter was documented as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
• Both twins died on May 1, 2025.
April 2026
The American Academy of Pediatrics moves to dismiss the federal lawsuit.
April 9, 2026
Elsevier publishing publicly posts a notice that it has initiated an investigation into the 2021 study by Neil Z. Miller examining reports of infant deaths following vaccination in the VAERS database. Elsevier says reported “serious concerns” arrived in 2025.
May 26, 2026
Elsevier publishing removes the 2021 Neil Z. Miller study, “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature,” from its journal Toxicology Reports. The study analyzed 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS and found that 58% occurred within 3 days of vaccination and 78.3% within 7 days. Among reported post-vaccination SIDS cases, 75% occurred within 7 days. The paper argued that the strong clustering of reported deaths shortly after vaccination warranted investigation into whether vaccination could contribute to sudden death in a susceptible subset of infants.
** Why was a five-year-old paper investigated and removed by Lawrence H. Lash at this particular time?
June 2026
The removal of the vaccine/SIDS study becomes a larger public controversy, with questions raised about why the paper was removed and whether the retraction process was scientifically justified.
June 18, 2026
The controversy receives additional attention after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly demands answers concerning the removal of research examining possible associations between vaccination and infant deaths.
June 29, 2026
Payette County grand jury indicts Andrea Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder.
June 29, 2026
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sends a formal letter to Elsevier CEO Kumsal Bayazit and Toxicology Reports Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash demanding records concerning the removal of Neil Z. Miller’s vaccine/SIDS study. Johnson questions why the peer-reviewed paper was removed five years after publication following criticism linked to anonymous PubPeer comments and requests all peer reviews, complaints, communications with Magdalen Wind-Mozley and Neil Miller, communications involving PubPeer, and all records related to the decision to remove the study. He gives Elsevier a deadline of July 14, 2026 to produce the records.
June 30, 2026
Andrea Shaw is arrested.
July 2, 2026
Andrea is arraigned. Bond is set at $2 million.
July 2026
The prosecution publicly alleges that Andrea suffocated both twins.
“They” were getting ahead of the story by removing anything that pointed to death after a vaccination
Look at this overlap
Andrea Shaw / Dallas & Tyson Shaw — Timeline
April 23, 2025
18-month-old twins Dallas and Tyson Shaw receive DTaP, hepatitis A, and influenza vaccines at the same appointment.
April 24, 2025
Both twins become ill and are taken for medical evaluation/ER care. Symptoms reported include lethargy, diarrhea, sunken eyes, and blue/discolored lips. The medical encounter is described in the later federal lawsuit as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
April 30, 2025
Night before the twins’ deaths
Andrea Shaw contacted the twins’ doctor’s office because Dallas and Tyson were still not doing well. Her attorney has stated that Andrea repeatedly sought medical care for the twins in the days leading up to their deaths.
May 1, 2025
Eight days after vaccination, both 18-month-old twins are found dead in their shared bed at their home in Payette, Idaho.
May 2025
Police and medical examiner investigation begins.
May 2025
Andrea Shaw and her husband publicly discuss the twins’ deaths with Children’s Health Defense. Andrea says both children became sick after receiving their vaccines and publicly attributes their deaths to vaccine-related complications.
December 18, 2025
Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash emailed Miller about concerns from “multiple parties” (including potential research errors, methodological issues with VAERS data, and statements on vaccine efficacy). Lash referenced PubPeer comments and requested a response.
2025
The deaths remain under investigation by authorities, including the Payette Police Department and forensic/medical examiner agencies.
2026
January 14, 2026 - Jablonowski/Hooker study “Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations” was withdrawn/removed
January 21, 2026
Andrea Shaw becomes a named plaintiff in a federal RICO lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP):
Shaw et al. v. American Academy of Pediatrics
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Case No. 1:26-cv-00171
The lawsuit centers on allegations concerning the AAP’s representations about childhood vaccine safety. Andrea’s case and the deaths of Dallas and Tyson are included in the RICO lawsuit.
The complaint states that:
• The family had raised concerns about a family history of adverse reactions to influenza vaccination.
• The twins received DTaP, hepatitis A and influenza vaccines on April 23, 2025.
• Both became ill afterward.
• They were taken for medical care the following day.
• Their medical encounter was documented as “post-immunization reaction, initial encounter.”
• Both twins died on May 1, 2025.
April 2026
The American Academy of Pediatrics moves to dismiss the federal lawsuit.
April 9, 2026
Elsevier publishing publicly posts a notice that it has initiated an investigation into the 2021 study by Neil Z. Miller examining reports of infant deaths following vaccination in the VAERS database. Elsevier says reported “serious concerns” arrived in 2025.
May 26, 2026
Elsevier publishing removes the 2021 Neil Z. Miller study, “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature,” from its journal Toxicology Reports. The study analyzed 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS and found that 58% occurred within 3 days of vaccination and 78.3% within 7 days. Among reported post-vaccination SIDS cases, 75% occurred within 7 days. The paper argued that the strong clustering of reported deaths shortly after vaccination warranted investigation into whether vaccination could contribute to sudden death in a susceptible subset of infants.
** Why was a five-year-old paper investigated and removed by Lawrence H. Lash at this particular time?
June 2026
The removal of the vaccine/SIDS study becomes a larger public controversy, with questions raised about why the paper was removed and whether the retraction process was scientifically justified.
June 18, 2026
The controversy receives additional attention after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly demands answers concerning the removal of research examining possible associations between vaccination and infant deaths.
June 29, 2026
Payette County grand jury indicts Andrea Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder.
June 29, 2026
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sends a formal letter to Elsevier CEO Kumsal Bayazit and Toxicology Reports Editor-in-Chief Lawrence H. Lash demanding records concerning the removal of Neil Z. Miller’s vaccine/SIDS study. Johnson questions why the peer-reviewed paper was removed five years after publication following criticism linked to anonymous PubPeer comments and requests all peer reviews, complaints, communications with Magdalen Wind-Mozley and Neil Miller, communications involving PubPeer, and all records related to the decision to remove the study. He gives Elsevier a deadline of July 14, 2026 to produce the records.
June 30, 2026
Andrea Shaw is arrested.
July 2, 2026
Andrea is arraigned. Bond is set at $2 million.
July 2026
The prosecution publicly alleges that Andrea suffocated both twins.
“They” were getting ahead of the story by removing anything that pointed to death after a vaccination
They also removed Neil Miller’s paper on SIDS around the same time. The following month Andrew Shaw filed RICO charges on AAP. It’s not a coincidence.
DEFUND http://pre-print.org
FOR SUPPRESSING THE TRUTH
Az igazság fáj. Az oltások mítoszát fenn kell tartani. Nagy pénz. Emberi élet nem szamit
Thank you Steve, once again as a digital, computer Data-Scientist, for breaking through the big-Pharma fake 'money' (Greek mnemosis' = 'memory') amnesic Oligarch NOISE of Profit-before-life. The question, which should be occupying all us readers, parents, family & community members is not to endlessly 'decry' this top-down hierarchy, designed-to-fail pharmaceutical death industry.
Humanity's only viable relevant option is to "Become the change we want to see in the world", which Mohandas Gandhi advocated as part of India's 'Swadeshi' (Hindi 'indigenous' aka 'self-sufficiency') movement 1917-47. Through organizing local family, extended family & village self-sufficiency in healthy local whole food, ~!00 (50-150) person multihome Ashram, locally grown plant fibres for spinning & weaving into Khadi clothes & materials, Ayurvedic (plant-based) medicine, local 'economy' (Gk 'oikos' = 'home' + 'namein' = 'care-&-nurture') became stronger. Once a threshold of just 5% diminution of the British Empire (US, Britain, Canada, Australia etc) extractive & exploitive import-export economy had been reached then many 100s of these parasitic corporations went bankrupt & 'Swaraj' (H. 'self-rule') was recognized in 1947.
DO-WE-KNOW-WHO-WE-ARE-? Http://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/d-participatory-structure/9-do-we-know-who-we-are web-based Community-Circular-Economy software for animating personal & group talents, goods, services, resources & dreams. The most effective energy-conservation practice is made by the 70% of people who live in the ~100 (50-150) person Multihome-Dwelling-Complex (eg. Apartment, Townhouse & Village). 20% of Multihome-dwellers are extended-families living intentionally in proximity for social & economic collaboration, contributing 2 trillion $/year of the most individually appropriate goods, services, sharing & caring/year to Turtle-Island/N America in Relational Economy. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy
APPROPRIATE-SCALE CULTURAL ECONOMY FOUNDATION All indigenous humanity kept intimate, intergenerational, female-male, interdisciplinary, critical-mass, economies-of-scale & medical records often lasting millennia in the Multihome. Multihomes should be the 1st Line of nutritional, preventative & restorative Medical intervention by specialists already amongst us treating people proactively & positively in harmony with nature. Multihomes cost 1/3rd per unit, per planning, purchase, operating-costs, heating, financing, repairs, maintenance, management etc. Https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy/1-extending-our-welcome-participatory-multihome-cohousing
We just need to know where their money comes from. Who butters their bread?
That's the question.
My comment concerns the language for your survey, specifically: did preprints.org mistakenly reject the study. I would posit the rejection is not a mistake but a deliberate action to obscure the truth. And I also assume you had to describe it as such to keep from being canceled.
Thank you for continuing to analyze and share your results and conclusions.
It is obvious we live in a deeply corrupt society.