6 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Remember, it’s malfeasance disguised as incompetence.

Expand full comment

That's why the huge Canadian study used to justify vaxxing the pregnants didn't consider the first trimester and did other tricks:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/war-on-mothers-and-babies

All this human culling is deliberate. Wake up Steve!

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

From my early research: http://bit.ly/research2000

Murdering babies through bad recommendations

In a comprehensive review of ca. 500 studies involving 28,952 mothers with covid-19 who sought hospital care, funded by the “German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) covid-19 Research and development support to the World Health Organization and the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)”:

1. Mother-baby transmission was as rare as 0.1% in North America (1% globally due to unreliable data).

2. Those percentages could be halved if we consider the huge rate of PCR false positives.

3. COVID19 didn’t affect babies due to their extremely low ACE-2 receptor density.

Conclusion, there was no problem with COVID at all during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

“SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detected in amniotic fluid, placenta, vaginal fluid, and breast milk, but detection of virus in these biological specimens may not necessarily indicate infection in the baby. The observed association between postnatal diagnosis of maternal SARS-CoV-2 and neonates who test positive could also be attributed to horizontal transmission from the mother, caregivers, or health workers, or from the neonate’s environment.

We did not find any association between breastfeeding practice and SARS-CoV-2 positivity in neonates, consistent with rare findings of RT-PCR positivity in breast milk samples.

… amniotic fluid, placenta, and vaginal secretions, finding a pathogen in such samples does not necessarily correlate with infection of the fetus.

No associations were shown between SARS-CoV-2 positivity in babies and the trimester of maternal infection (third versus first or second trimester), preterm birth, mode of delivery, breastfeeding, or mother-baby separation at birth.” 1

Not counting the horror of experimental vaccination on pregnant and breastfeeding women, every single recommendation for them was lethal for the babies:

• Pre-term delivery

• C-section

• Mother-baby separation

• Forbidding of breastfeeding

• Abortion considered an essential activity during lock downs

• Death of pregnant woman by denial of lifesaving treatments or recommendation of lethal protocols (ventilator)

Murdering babies through vaxxed breastmilk

Many lactating babies died a few hours or days after mother was vaccinated.

8974 breast disorders (VigiAccess): Breast pain (4900), Breast swelling (1277), Breast tenderness (858), Breast mass (625), Breast discomfort (315), Breast enlargement (312), Breast inflammation (170), Breast cyst (118), Breast oedema (79), Breast discharge (77), Breast engorgement (64), Breast induration (38), Breast disorder (37), Breast disorder female (27), Breast haematoma (27), Breast discolouration (17), Breast haemorrhage (12), Breast hyperplasia (6), Breast calcifications (5), Breast atrophy (4), Breast fibrosis (2), Breast necrosis (2).

Also, milk disorders: Breast milk discolouration (19), Breast milk odour abnormal (2), Poor milk ejection reflex (3)

Muerdering babies through a needle

In the UK above table, vaccination was linked to:

• 3463 problems with pregnancy, delivery and lactation

• 1737 fetal complications (risk of lifelong disability and death)

• 606 deaths of unborn babies. Interesting consequence of “legal” abortion: “spontaneous” abortions were not classified in the “Deaths” column2, only stillbirths3

7 Jan 2022, VAERS (USA) was reporting 3594 miscarriages: for safety reasons, pregnants were excluded from all Fases in clinical trials but there was no problem in pushing them into massive COVID experimental vaccination without any prior safety data.

WHO VigiAccess shows 5000 pregnancy issues. Obviously, the database is heavily under-reported, considering there are 5000 in the UK alone.

Still, both numbers are statistically huge:

The number of pregnancy problems is smaller than others, like thrombi, which are massive. Yet, in proportion they are much higher, because the number of pregnancies is small in comparison to the whole population, and vaccinated pregnancies were even smaller (started by mid 2021).

Also, problem in pregnancy have a huge impact on

The following should have triggered a red alert and halted all vaccination to pregnant women, and yet there was not a single reaction in any country of the world:

Abortion spontaneous (3008), Pregnancy (338), Foetal death (257), Abortion missed (127), Premature labour (113), Haemorrhage in pregnancy (106), Abortion (103), Foetal hypokinesia (93), Premature delivery (89), Uterine contractions during pregnancy (85), Foetal growth restriction (80), Morning sickness (77), Premature baby (77), Stillbirth (77), Delivery (76), Ectopic pregnancy (68), Premature separation of placenta (55), Pre-eclampsia (53), Premature rupture of membranes (52), Induced labour (50), Live birth (50), Gestational diabetes (46), Anembryonic gestation (42), Uterine hypertonus (41), Uterine contractions abnormal (37), Preterm premature rupture of membranes (36), Postpartum haemorrhage (29), Pelvic girdle pain (28), Abortion threatened (22), Placental disorder (22), Complication of pregnancy (20), First trimester pregnancy (18), Gestational hypertension (18), Amniorrhoea (17), Decidual cast (15), HELLP syndrome (15), Foetal disorder (14), Subchorionic haematoma (14), Threatened labour (14), Abortion early (13), etc.

Add:

Foetal cardiac arrest (17)

Cardiac arrest neonatal (1)

Tachycardia foetal (21)

Bradycardia foetal (10)

Foetal heart rate disorder (3)

Foetal heart rate deceleration abnormality (2)

Foetal heart rate acceleration abnormality (1)

Foetal arrhythmia (1)

Foetal heart rate acceleration abnormality (1)

Sinusoidal foetal heart rate pattern (1)

In sum, those 4000 baby deaths could have been avoided by using treatments when necessary, instead of turning pregnants and their babies into involuntary guinea pigs. Also, vaccines disabled many babies for life.

This showed guilty ignorance of the topic and was be lethal for many women and children:

1. Databases like Yellow Card (UK) and VAERS (USA) showed thousands of unborn babies dying after COVID vaccination.

2. They also showed an unnatural spike of deaths of already born babies when the mother took COVID shots during breastfeeding, which proves that the vaccines are not safe for babies.

3. Pfizer and Moderna discontinued their studies on infants due to the severe adverse reactions (and, statistically, zero benefit)

4. Pfizer added a cardiovascular drug to the vaccine ingredients for children to cloak the severe damage it was detecting already, recognized by the CDC myocarditis table.

5. All studies prove that vaccination doesn’t prevent contagion.

6. With i-Mask protocol, or one drop of ivermectin every 4 hours when outside home, there’s zero risk of getting sick with COVID.

7. After contagion, there's no increased risk to the mother, with over 30 effective drugs and early treatments, many harmless to the unborn baby (steam, melatonin, vitamin D, etc.), which should be indicted even if vaccinated. There’s no contraindication in the postpartum period, which is the most risky (n.b. age over 35 years and diabetes) 1, yet they were denied effective treatments.

8. “Direct transplacental transmission of Sars-Cov-2 does not seem to constitute a major argument in favor of Sars-Cov-2 vaccination.” 2 COVID does nothing to babies, who lack ACE2 receptors, plus intrauterine transmission is rare and breastfeeding transmission is not significant.

9. It takes 2 shots separated by at least a month and then a 2 week period for the vaccines to be supposedly effective. During that period, severe sickness is still possible.

10. There’s no statistically significant study proving that vaccination reduced maternal mortality.

All the studies which recommended vaccination to pregnants were flawed:

a. Relied on PCR tests without acknowledging its enormous rate of false positives.

b. Compared with un-pregnant women, when it is obvious that pregnancy would increase risk and hospitalization. 3

c. In this study, pregnancy status was missing on more than half of reported cases. 4

d. As vaccine benefit in theoretical COVID reduction, they compared to unhospitalized pregnant women, in spite that hospitalization could be a result of a risky pregnancy and not COVID. 5

e. The alleged increased preterm risk, didn’t take into account that the preterm delivery was induced by the obstetrics and not COVID: women were pressured into C-section preterm for subjective fear of risk and not real risk.

f. Didn’t adjust for confounding factors like age6, weeks of pregnancy, number of prior pregnancies/abortions7, pre-eclampsia, “higher maternal age, high body mass index, non-white ethnicity, and pre-pregnancy comorbid conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension.” 8

1 Sep 2020 “the odds for all-cause mortality were not increased.” (n=601,122) 9

19 Aug 2021 Most had mild symptoms. 10

16 Sep 2021 “Moving beyond the opt-in to the opt-out option.” 11

20 Set 2021, a Canadian cherry-picked study, which deliberately left out the first trimester to hide severe adverse events, showed no association with adverse peripartum outcomes such as postpartum haemorrhage or low Apgar scores among 22 660 vaccinated women. 12

20 Apr 2022 CDC recognized that COVID “overall risks are low”. 13

Expand full comment

In the US, Naomi Wolf’s team of 3500 volunteers sifting through the Pfizer data dumps each month, found an 8-pg. report of their clinical trial on preggers. The clinical trial was cut short. Amy Kelly, the Program Manager of the Daily Clout team wrote a report with this short Pfizer report embedded, showing the dangers. Naomi said they figured Pfizer’s negative outcome, not recommended for pregnant women report was in the CDC 4 days prior to Rochelle Walensky’s major media push to vaxxn pregnant women! AND yet even though they knew, Pfizer said nothing!?! (Amy Kelly’s report is posted on the Daily Clout’s website) Recommended reading.

Expand full comment

Here’s a link to a segment of Naomi Wolfe’s Hillsdale College presentation, reporting reproductive harms in April, 2023: https://youtu.be/T9Y_W_30hsM

Expand full comment

Those terms are not the least bit synonymous.

Expand full comment