1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

>Moderna recipients had up to a 50% higher death rate than Pfizer<

Well, the population reduction advocates should applaud Moderna for doing the job better than the competition. (I think it was due to higher nRNA concentrations.)

Implicit in a discussion like this, is the assumption that the vaXs were meant to help people live longer and healthier. The results of the early test applications showed the mRNA vaXs were dangerous, and pharma tried to bury that info for 75 years.

As mass vaXing went on, some people dying quickly, some with other near immediate severe reactions, athletes dying in the middle of games or training - all this info suppressed to the degree that pharma and the Western govts. could. As time went on: cancers, dementia, vessel clotting, terrible neurologic problems, cognitive decline.

Effective low or no side effect treatments suppressed, MDs who spoke out about the debacle had their professional and financial lives and reputations wrecked with systematic intention.

Malicious stupidity measures like vaXing people with minimal risk from cv19, distancing, masks, shutting down small businesses (while allowing large businesses to be open), religious gatherings - you can't accuse them of not having planned things out.

Degenerate entertainers making sport of people who warned of the vaX dangers. Degenerate MDs advocating vaXs even after they had to know what was going on.

What's next? Apparently wrecking the food supply is the target.

Expand full comment