I don’t understand. How can the effects of the disease and the vaccine be differentiated in this cohort to a very high degree of certainty given that it is not very often considered that asymptomatic covid is much more prevalent than we think? Are we testing these patients for wild virus antibodies?
I don’t understand. How can the effects of the disease and the vaccine be differentiated in this cohort to a very high degree of certainty given that it is not very often considered that asymptomatic covid is much more prevalent than we think? Are we testing these patients for wild virus antibodies?
I think "asymptomatic COVID" was bovine manure intended to frighten people, make people fear each other even more, get more people to accept spikeshots, etc. The PCR tests were bogus if run more than about 28 cycles and all those "asymptomatic cases" found by PCR tests run for more cycles were just "fear fodder."
Be careful about slamming PCR. It is now being used to support claims of foreign DNA being found in the blood of those who have been vaxed with mRNA. 28 cycles or not, we can’t say it fails when that supports our argument and then later it works when that supports our argument too. Which is it?
We can, absolutely, say that PCR tests mean something when "positive" when run for X or fewer cycles and don't mean anything when run for X+1 or more. The inventor of PCR said (paraphrasing here) that if you run the process through enough cycles, you can find anything anywhere. The only question is "What is the appropriate value of X?" In the case of COVID, the researchers whose opinions I respected were saying numbers from about 23 to 28.
I don’t understand. How can the effects of the disease and the vaccine be differentiated in this cohort to a very high degree of certainty given that it is not very often considered that asymptomatic covid is much more prevalent than we think? Are we testing these patients for wild virus antibodies?
I think "asymptomatic COVID" was bovine manure intended to frighten people, make people fear each other even more, get more people to accept spikeshots, etc. The PCR tests were bogus if run more than about 28 cycles and all those "asymptomatic cases" found by PCR tests run for more cycles were just "fear fodder."
Be careful about slamming PCR. It is now being used to support claims of foreign DNA being found in the blood of those who have been vaxed with mRNA. 28 cycles or not, we can’t say it fails when that supports our argument and then later it works when that supports our argument too. Which is it?
We can, absolutely, say that PCR tests mean something when "positive" when run for X or fewer cycles and don't mean anything when run for X+1 or more. The inventor of PCR said (paraphrasing here) that if you run the process through enough cycles, you can find anything anywhere. The only question is "What is the appropriate value of X?" In the case of COVID, the researchers whose opinions I respected were saying numbers from about 23 to 28.