These ideas have been addressed by quite a few people. If delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment were to blame for the sharp rise in ACM mortality, it wouldn’t happen in the young or middle-aged the way that it did as the young and middle-age are not in danger of dying within days or months from chronic diseases that go undiagnos…
These ideas have been addressed by quite a few people. If delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment were to blame for the sharp rise in ACM mortality, it wouldn’t happen in the young or middle-aged the way that it did as the young and middle-age are not in danger of dying within days or months from chronic diseases that go undiagnosed. And even if they did die from these things, it would have showed up before the roll out of the mRNA and it would have showed up more in the older age groups. And it would have been a very small rise because chronic disease is not a major cause of death for young and middle-aged people.
Also, regardless of that insignificant reality, if delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatments did cause a massive rise in ACM, (coincidentally at the same time the injection mandates were rolled out) wouldn’t public health officials be responsible for reckless health policies that were more harmful than the disease? Yet no one who thinks the injections were safe and effective is calling for the people responsible for the lockdowns, (which again, theoretically caused excess ACM) to be held responsible for such death and destruction. To me, this is evidence that the horrible policies such as lockdowns and emptying the hospitals did cause harm, but not enough to pin the blame on the public health agencies for this specific reason and to explain away the ACM rise in late 2021.
Something caused high rates of ACM in young people and no one defending the mRNA jabs has a suitable explanation, nor are they even looking for it. If public health agencies cared, or if they weren’t guilty of playing a roll in it, they would try to figure it out. It’s their ONE job. It’s a big deal to have young people dying at massively higher than normal rates, during a “pandemic” from a virus that really only was a significant danger to the elderly and people with high numbers of co-morbidities. That results in massively higher loss of life years.
And no on us saying that the public health policies were not harmful. They clearly were, which is partially why there is a massive drop in trust of public health officials. Suicide increased, drug dependency increased. But I don’t think accidents did. But even with those increases, it is not enough to explain things like rises in heart related deaths in all age groups.
Even if your theory was completely correct, it means the public health agencies and the current medical system caused massive unnecessary deaths in young people. And oddly, no one who thinks this is the case is calling for accountability. At least I haven’t seen it. It’s like an excuse that seems less ominous (incompetence) than the fact that they pushed something lethal on the public, and that incompetence somehow makes it okay, or not that bad, or understandable, or just bad luck or something?
Either scenario is very, very bad. The response to the “pandemic” was a complete disaster and the biggest problem is that no one is being held accountable to prevent it happening again, and no one from public health agencies is explaining, which transparency of the data, whether it was incompetence or malfeasance or whatever.
And new mRNA injections for things like RSV continue to be rolled out to the public with out proper testing because they are being rolled out under EUA laws, just like the Covid injections. If people don’t demand data transparency and if we don’t demand accountability, for whatever happened, we are essentially allowing it to happen again.
Also, if your theory of why the ACM went up is correct, it should have normalized after lockdowns ended. It didn’t. The ACM is still above average but it’s going to be the normal soon.
It too bad they ended the double blind placebo after 2 months. We could have known what was going to happen long term had they studied it like they originally planned the study. Although even then, in the few weeks that they had the trial running, it showed a higher ACM in the injection group. But that’s probably just a coincidence that it also happened with the world wide roll out.
These ideas have been addressed by quite a few people. If delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment were to blame for the sharp rise in ACM mortality, it wouldn’t happen in the young or middle-aged the way that it did as the young and middle-age are not in danger of dying within days or months from chronic diseases that go undiagnosed. And even if they did die from these things, it would have showed up before the roll out of the mRNA and it would have showed up more in the older age groups. And it would have been a very small rise because chronic disease is not a major cause of death for young and middle-aged people.
Also, regardless of that insignificant reality, if delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatments did cause a massive rise in ACM, (coincidentally at the same time the injection mandates were rolled out) wouldn’t public health officials be responsible for reckless health policies that were more harmful than the disease? Yet no one who thinks the injections were safe and effective is calling for the people responsible for the lockdowns, (which again, theoretically caused excess ACM) to be held responsible for such death and destruction. To me, this is evidence that the horrible policies such as lockdowns and emptying the hospitals did cause harm, but not enough to pin the blame on the public health agencies for this specific reason and to explain away the ACM rise in late 2021.
Something caused high rates of ACM in young people and no one defending the mRNA jabs has a suitable explanation, nor are they even looking for it. If public health agencies cared, or if they weren’t guilty of playing a roll in it, they would try to figure it out. It’s their ONE job. It’s a big deal to have young people dying at massively higher than normal rates, during a “pandemic” from a virus that really only was a significant danger to the elderly and people with high numbers of co-morbidities. That results in massively higher loss of life years.
And no on us saying that the public health policies were not harmful. They clearly were, which is partially why there is a massive drop in trust of public health officials. Suicide increased, drug dependency increased. But I don’t think accidents did. But even with those increases, it is not enough to explain things like rises in heart related deaths in all age groups.
Even if your theory was completely correct, it means the public health agencies and the current medical system caused massive unnecessary deaths in young people. And oddly, no one who thinks this is the case is calling for accountability. At least I haven’t seen it. It’s like an excuse that seems less ominous (incompetence) than the fact that they pushed something lethal on the public, and that incompetence somehow makes it okay, or not that bad, or understandable, or just bad luck or something?
Either scenario is very, very bad. The response to the “pandemic” was a complete disaster and the biggest problem is that no one is being held accountable to prevent it happening again, and no one from public health agencies is explaining, which transparency of the data, whether it was incompetence or malfeasance or whatever.
And new mRNA injections for things like RSV continue to be rolled out to the public with out proper testing because they are being rolled out under EUA laws, just like the Covid injections. If people don’t demand data transparency and if we don’t demand accountability, for whatever happened, we are essentially allowing it to happen again.
Also, if your theory of why the ACM went up is correct, it should have normalized after lockdowns ended. It didn’t. The ACM is still above average but it’s going to be the normal soon.
It too bad they ended the double blind placebo after 2 months. We could have known what was going to happen long term had they studied it like they originally planned the study. Although even then, in the few weeks that they had the trial running, it showed a higher ACM in the injection group. But that’s probably just a coincidence that it also happened with the world wide roll out.