thanks for the tip ! the one i went with against masking was somewhat older, from the Canadian dentist organization, and was taken down in spring 2020, forced by castreau and co, so I knew it was good !
thanks for the tip ! the one i went with against masking was somewhat older, from the Canadian dentist organization, and was taken down in spring 2020, forced by castreau and co, so I knew it was good !
Exactly. I've read a lot of studies with an increasingly jaundiced eye. For example, the study might include extraneous information not part of the study. I saw a lot of studies about the jab and its bad effects, yet at the bottom there was this catch all statement that the jab still protected most people. Of course there was no science or reference to any study that showed that. The authors just wanted to be published.
thanks for the tip ! the one i went with against masking was somewhat older, from the Canadian dentist organization, and was taken down in spring 2020, forced by castreau and co, so I knew it was good !
I read that one too!
Exactly. I've read a lot of studies with an increasingly jaundiced eye. For example, the study might include extraneous information not part of the study. I saw a lot of studies about the jab and its bad effects, yet at the bottom there was this catch all statement that the jab still protected most people. Of course there was no science or reference to any study that showed that. The authors just wanted to be published.