After months of intensive anguish over what appears to be very clear and consistent information, completely ignored by the powers that be, I find myself asking less about these shots (I think I have enough solid information at this point), and asking WTH is behind it all. It is abundantly clear that no amount of information will stop th…
After months of intensive anguish over what appears to be very clear and consistent information, completely ignored by the powers that be, I find myself asking less about these shots (I think I have enough solid information at this point), and asking WTH is behind it all. It is abundantly clear that no amount of information will stop the push to inject us all, which leads to the next obvious (and perhaps more important question), what is behind all of this? Money, yes, but it's not all about pharma profit. This is a well strategized, global campaign and effort and speaks to something larger. What is happening here and how can we stop it? Is that even possible?
Sidestepping any grander conspiracies (which I do not deny as being plausible), I was speculating about why the CDC just started pushing unnecessary covid vaccines on kids despite the data...and I think they now "have to" do it or admit they were wrong. I have a longer analysis I published here today: https://wholistic.substack.com/p/shameless-cdc-recommends-pfizer-for
I agree completely with your analysis--but I think they DID have an easy out with the math, exactly as you describe--i.e. they could have completely avoided the issue of safety. And frankly, it would have given them tremendous credibility. Instead, it was the nail in the coffin for almost half the country. I'll never trust the CDC again and in a way, I'm glad they did this to themselves so we no longer have to wonder.
Good point, though I wonder if part of the problem is that they are in a bubble and don't realize it's half the country they are destroying their credibility with...they think it's a fringe minority in part because big tech's censorship gives a false impression that everyone is in agreement when we're not.
Agreed! Catherine’s brilliant Planet Lockdown interview is a great place to start. I’ll link to the full page of their interviews as they are all revelatory and gobsmacking: https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-interviews/
The best explanation for the behavior of about 99.9% of people, that I've found, is Mass Formation. See, for example, "WHY DO SO MANY STILL BUY INTO THE NARRATIVE?(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLDpZ8daIVM). Their motivation was fear.
As for the next 0.09%, I think it's the corruption of the ruling class explained in this video, "MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M. The ruling class really believes their own BS. Their motivation is their own savior complex. These people actually took the shot.
The next 0.01% is the CCP leadership and various technocratic transhumanists. Their motivation is probably what it always is -- money, power, vanity, control. These people did not take the shot.
I’m sure you already know about Professor Mattias Desmet’s work on mass formation as he’s gotten a lot of attention since his interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj5bo_KFqgo) with St. Reiner Fuellmich and his Berlin Corona Investigative Committee.
Right, but I am not asking about why so many people buy into this--that is obvious when federal health agencies give it a thumbs up and the media is controlled. I am asking, to what end is all this happening? It's more than just pharma profit. This is backed by hundreds of billions of dollars.
Health passport to mandate many other jabs, digital ID with all your information on it. Digital currency showing every purchase and controlling your money. If you don't get the jab your bank account will be shut down, happened in Nigeria already.
I know, but I think it's different answers for different groups.
For some people exerting control over others, it's fear. For others, it's ego-corruption/savior-complex. For the inner circle, it's probably some combination money/power/control/vanity, because it always is.
Great questions, unfortunately the theories to the root cause(s) are so far fetched...it's almost impossible to believe. Thanks Steve Kirsch and to your team for providing evidence based counter narrative.
What theories? Yes, we have, and continue to have, irrefutable evidence-based data and narratives. But I can't help but think we are spitting in the wind. You sound like you are shutting down a conversation before it's begun. Perhaps seeing the bigger picture would help.
Smoking gun is sort of an ambiguous definition of what constitutes evidence. Even a frank admission by a person or group can be waived off. They've written extensively about their ambitions, a sort of 'revelation of the method.' Contrary to popular belief, a court conviction can be made on circumstantial evidence. I suppose it boils down to what each individual as to what constitutes enough evidence. I don't know how many times people need to be told by someone like the Duke of Edinburgh that the world population needs to be culled by a factor of 100x before they accept the idea that the very powerful may actually be moving to accomplish such a goal. They have their philosophers like Ray Kurzweil and Jacques Attali, their policy/thinktank people like Zbigniew Brzezinski, and their groups like the WEF and the Club of Rome. They're all cut-outs for the people who are so wealthy we're not even allowed to know their names, people who don't turn up on Forbes top 100 lists. They've been running the world for a thousand years. If we don't acknowledge their existence and recognize their aims, how can we ever hope to resist and fight back?
Here's a short and by no means comprehensive list of their books, papers and exercises.
Indeed! I do wonder about the origins of the manipulated quote, which seemed too spot-on to be true and hence launched me into my investigation of the original French text. His actual quotes are sinister enough, they don’t need any help when it comes to the grim, sociopathic socialist vision he describes!
I loved your comment on my last post, BTW. There were so many new comments after I managed to finally get some sleep, I’m still trying to find time to respond to them all!
And by the hypothesis, do you mean the one essentially explained by Fitts? I appreciate that. But it does seem to be the elephant in the room, esp. in light of what is going on elsewhere, like Australia. I do not want to go down any conspiracy rabbit holes either, but I can't help but think there are some answers in there. Honestly, it would be great news at this point if this were merely about pharma profit-something to sink our teeth into and fight, but I fear its much bigger than that. Thank you for your response.
After months of intensive anguish over what appears to be very clear and consistent information, completely ignored by the powers that be, I find myself asking less about these shots (I think I have enough solid information at this point), and asking WTH is behind it all. It is abundantly clear that no amount of information will stop the push to inject us all, which leads to the next obvious (and perhaps more important question), what is behind all of this? Money, yes, but it's not all about pharma profit. This is a well strategized, global campaign and effort and speaks to something larger. What is happening here and how can we stop it? Is that even possible?
https://worldyturnings.blog/2021/11/28/why-are-they-killing-us/
Georgia Guidestones
Sidestepping any grander conspiracies (which I do not deny as being plausible), I was speculating about why the CDC just started pushing unnecessary covid vaccines on kids despite the data...and I think they now "have to" do it or admit they were wrong. I have a longer analysis I published here today: https://wholistic.substack.com/p/shameless-cdc-recommends-pfizer-for
I agree completely with your analysis--but I think they DID have an easy out with the math, exactly as you describe--i.e. they could have completely avoided the issue of safety. And frankly, it would have given them tremendous credibility. Instead, it was the nail in the coffin for almost half the country. I'll never trust the CDC again and in a way, I'm glad they did this to themselves so we no longer have to wonder.
Good point, though I wonder if part of the problem is that they are in a bubble and don't realize it's half the country they are destroying their credibility with...they think it's a fringe minority in part because big tech's censorship gives a false impression that everyone is in agreement when we're not.
Google Catherine Austin Fitts for a good analysis of the likely aims of the powers that be.
This is also on the right track in my opinion: https://in-this-together.com/global-commons-part-1/
Agreed! Catherine’s brilliant Planet Lockdown interview is a great place to start. I’ll link to the full page of their interviews as they are all revelatory and gobsmacking: https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-interviews/
The best explanation for the behavior of about 99.9% of people, that I've found, is Mass Formation. See, for example, "WHY DO SO MANY STILL BUY INTO THE NARRATIVE?(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLDpZ8daIVM). Their motivation was fear.
As for the next 0.09%, I think it's the corruption of the ruling class explained in this video, "MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M. The ruling class really believes their own BS. Their motivation is their own savior complex. These people actually took the shot.
The next 0.01% is the CCP leadership and various technocratic transhumanists. Their motivation is probably what it always is -- money, power, vanity, control. These people did not take the shot.
Academy of Ideas should be required viewing for everyone. I included their three-part series on mass psychosis in my first article, “A Primer for the Propagandized: Fear Is the Mind-Killer” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-primer-for-the-propagandized).
I’m sure you already know about Professor Mattias Desmet’s work on mass formation as he’s gotten a lot of attention since his interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj5bo_KFqgo) with St. Reiner Fuellmich and his Berlin Corona Investigative Committee.
As for the end goal, I have my theories. My fairy tale (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/get-the-book-the-vapor-the-hot-hat) pretty much sums it up.
Right, but I am not asking about why so many people buy into this--that is obvious when federal health agencies give it a thumbs up and the media is controlled. I am asking, to what end is all this happening? It's more than just pharma profit. This is backed by hundreds of billions of dollars.
Health passport to mandate many other jabs, digital ID with all your information on it. Digital currency showing every purchase and controlling your money. If you don't get the jab your bank account will be shut down, happened in Nigeria already.
I know, but I think it's different answers for different groups.
For some people exerting control over others, it's fear. For others, it's ego-corruption/savior-complex. For the inner circle, it's probably some combination money/power/control/vanity, because it always is.
Great questions, unfortunately the theories to the root cause(s) are so far fetched...it's almost impossible to believe. Thanks Steve Kirsch and to your team for providing evidence based counter narrative.
What theories? Yes, we have, and continue to have, irrefutable evidence-based data and narratives. But I can't help but think we are spitting in the wind. You sound like you are shutting down a conversation before it's begun. Perhaps seeing the bigger picture would help.
no smoking gun discovered to confirm the hypothesis
Smoking gun is sort of an ambiguous definition of what constitutes evidence. Even a frank admission by a person or group can be waived off. They've written extensively about their ambitions, a sort of 'revelation of the method.' Contrary to popular belief, a court conviction can be made on circumstantial evidence. I suppose it boils down to what each individual as to what constitutes enough evidence. I don't know how many times people need to be told by someone like the Duke of Edinburgh that the world population needs to be culled by a factor of 100x before they accept the idea that the very powerful may actually be moving to accomplish such a goal. They have their philosophers like Ray Kurzweil and Jacques Attali, their policy/thinktank people like Zbigniew Brzezinski, and their groups like the WEF and the Club of Rome. They're all cut-outs for the people who are so wealthy we're not even allowed to know their names, people who don't turn up on Forbes top 100 lists. They've been running the world for a thousand years. If we don't acknowledge their existence and recognize their aims, how can we ever hope to resist and fight back?
Here's a short and by no means comprehensive list of their books, papers and exercises.
2021: National Intelligence Council, Strategic Futures Group, Global Trends Report https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/GlobalTrends_2040.pdf
2019, October: "Event 201"
2019, September: WHO and WB’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, "A World at Risk" https://www.gpmb.org/docs/librariesprovider17/default-document-library/annual-reports/gpmb-2019-annualreport-en.pdf?sfvrsn=d1c9143c_30&download=true
2019, September: WHO and WB’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, "Executive Summary" https://www.gpmb.org/docs/librariesprovider17/default-document-library/annual-reports/gpmb-2019-execsum-annualreport-en.pdf?sfvrsn=660402fa_28&download=true
2019, September: Stress Tests: An Insight Into Crisis Scenarios, Simulations and Exercises "Unleashing 'Virus Z'" https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief%209%20Scenarios.pdf
2018, January: European Commission, "Exercise Chimera" https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/preparedness_response/docs/2018_hybridthreatsexercise_en.pdf
2010: Global Governance "2025: At a Critical Juncture" https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/Global%20Governance%202025.pdf
2010, May: Rockefeller Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development "Operation Lockstep" https://archive.org/details/2010-scenarios-for-the-future-of-technology-and-international-development
2004: "Pharma Futures," a scenario planning project on the future of the global pharmaceutical industry https://web.archive.org/web/20101230131213/http:/www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/PharmaFutures%20Scenarios%20Final%20Report%2012.04.pdf
The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome https://wakeup-world.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/The-Council-of-The-Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution.pdf
Millenium, Winners and Losers in the Coming World by Jacques Attali
1981 Michel Salomon – Jacques Attali interview https://straight2point.info/the-1981-michel-salomon-jacques-attali-interview/
Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab
COVID-19, The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab
The Open Conspiracy by H.G. Wells
The New World Order by H.G. Wells
The Impact of Science on Society by Bertrand Russel
Brave New World Revisited by Aldous Huxley (brother of eugenicist Julian Huxley, first director of UNESCO)
Prospect for America by the Rockefeller Panel Reports
Tragedy and Hope by Caroll Quigley
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigner Brzezinski
The Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington
Excellent! Thank you
Thanks for the thorough list! That Jacques Attali interview is jaw-dropping. I quoted it extensively in my last piece (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier), as you know :-)
I saw that, and thank you for that link. I only had a couple of Attali's quotes cobbled together before that. It really leaves you speechless.
Indeed! I do wonder about the origins of the manipulated quote, which seemed too spot-on to be true and hence launched me into my investigation of the original French text. His actual quotes are sinister enough, they don’t need any help when it comes to the grim, sociopathic socialist vision he describes!
I loved your comment on my last post, BTW. There were so many new comments after I managed to finally get some sleep, I’m still trying to find time to respond to them all!
Great find on the Attali interview.
It was a *tour de force*! Your most provocative article yet :)
Aww, thanks, GJ 😌 When I posted it to social media, I introduced it as “my next incendiary letter, sure to offend many ;-)”
And by the hypothesis, do you mean the one essentially explained by Fitts? I appreciate that. But it does seem to be the elephant in the room, esp. in light of what is going on elsewhere, like Australia. I do not want to go down any conspiracy rabbit holes either, but I can't help but think there are some answers in there. Honestly, it would be great news at this point if this were merely about pharma profit-something to sink our teeth into and fight, but I fear its much bigger than that. Thank you for your response.