What theories? Yes, we have, and continue to have, irrefutable evidence-based data and narratives. But I can't help but think we are spitting in the wind. You sound like you are shutting down a conversation before it's begun. Perhaps seeing the bigger picture would help.
What theories? Yes, we have, and continue to have, irrefutable evidence-based data and narratives. But I can't help but think we are spitting in the wind. You sound like you are shutting down a conversation before it's begun. Perhaps seeing the bigger picture would help.
Smoking gun is sort of an ambiguous definition of what constitutes evidence. Even a frank admission by a person or group can be waived off. They've written extensively about their ambitions, a sort of 'revelation of the method.' Contrary to popular belief, a court conviction can be made on circumstantial evidence. I suppose it boils down to what each individual as to what constitutes enough evidence. I don't know how many times people need to be told by someone like the Duke of Edinburgh that the world population needs to be culled by a factor of 100x before they accept the idea that the very powerful may actually be moving to accomplish such a goal. They have their philosophers like Ray Kurzweil and Jacques Attali, their policy/thinktank people like Zbigniew Brzezinski, and their groups like the WEF and the Club of Rome. They're all cut-outs for the people who are so wealthy we're not even allowed to know their names, people who don't turn up on Forbes top 100 lists. They've been running the world for a thousand years. If we don't acknowledge their existence and recognize their aims, how can we ever hope to resist and fight back?
Here's a short and by no means comprehensive list of their books, papers and exercises.
Indeed! I do wonder about the origins of the manipulated quote, which seemed too spot-on to be true and hence launched me into my investigation of the original French text. His actual quotes are sinister enough, they donтАЩt need any help when it comes to the grim, sociopathic socialist vision he describes!
I loved your comment on my last post, BTW. There were so many new comments after I managed to finally get some sleep, IтАЩm still trying to find time to respond to them all!
And by the hypothesis, do you mean the one essentially explained by Fitts? I appreciate that. But it does seem to be the elephant in the room, esp. in light of what is going on elsewhere, like Australia. I do not want to go down any conspiracy rabbit holes either, but I can't help but think there are some answers in there. Honestly, it would be great news at this point if this were merely about pharma profit-something to sink our teeth into and fight, but I fear its much bigger than that. Thank you for your response.
What theories? Yes, we have, and continue to have, irrefutable evidence-based data and narratives. But I can't help but think we are spitting in the wind. You sound like you are shutting down a conversation before it's begun. Perhaps seeing the bigger picture would help.
no smoking gun discovered to confirm the hypothesis
Smoking gun is sort of an ambiguous definition of what constitutes evidence. Even a frank admission by a person or group can be waived off. They've written extensively about their ambitions, a sort of 'revelation of the method.' Contrary to popular belief, a court conviction can be made on circumstantial evidence. I suppose it boils down to what each individual as to what constitutes enough evidence. I don't know how many times people need to be told by someone like the Duke of Edinburgh that the world population needs to be culled by a factor of 100x before they accept the idea that the very powerful may actually be moving to accomplish such a goal. They have their philosophers like Ray Kurzweil and Jacques Attali, their policy/thinktank people like Zbigniew Brzezinski, and their groups like the WEF and the Club of Rome. They're all cut-outs for the people who are so wealthy we're not even allowed to know their names, people who don't turn up on Forbes top 100 lists. They've been running the world for a thousand years. If we don't acknowledge their existence and recognize their aims, how can we ever hope to resist and fight back?
Here's a short and by no means comprehensive list of their books, papers and exercises.
2021: National Intelligence Council, Strategic Futures Group, Global Trends Report https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/GlobalTrends_2040.pdf
2019, October: "Event 201"
2019, September: WHO and WBтАЩs Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, "A World at Risk" https://www.gpmb.org/docs/librariesprovider17/default-document-library/annual-reports/gpmb-2019-annualreport-en.pdf?sfvrsn=d1c9143c_30&download=true
2019, September: WHO and WBтАЩs Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, "Executive Summary" https://www.gpmb.org/docs/librariesprovider17/default-document-library/annual-reports/gpmb-2019-execsum-annualreport-en.pdf?sfvrsn=660402fa_28&download=true
2019, September: Stress Tests: An Insight Into Crisis Scenarios, Simulations and Exercises "Unleashing 'Virus Z'" https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief%209%20Scenarios.pdf
2018, January: European Commission, "Exercise Chimera" https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/preparedness_response/docs/2018_hybridthreatsexercise_en.pdf
2010: Global Governance "2025: At a Critical Juncture" https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/Global%20Governance%202025.pdf
2010, May: Rockefeller Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development "Operation Lockstep" https://archive.org/details/2010-scenarios-for-the-future-of-technology-and-international-development
2004: "Pharma Futures," a scenario planning project on the future of the global pharmaceutical industry https://web.archive.org/web/20101230131213/http:/www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/PharmaFutures%20Scenarios%20Final%20Report%2012.04.pdf
The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome https://wakeup-world.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/The-Council-of-The-Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution.pdf
Millenium, Winners and Losers in the Coming World by Jacques Attali
1981 Michel Salomon тАУ Jacques Attali interview https://straight2point.info/the-1981-michel-salomon-jacques-attali-interview/
Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab
COVID-19, The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab
The Open Conspiracy by H.G. Wells
The New World Order by H.G. Wells
The Impact of Science on Society by Bertrand Russel
Brave New World Revisited by Aldous Huxley (brother of eugenicist Julian Huxley, first director of UNESCO)
Prospect for America by the Rockefeller Panel Reports
Tragedy and Hope by Caroll Quigley
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigner Brzezinski
The Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington
Excellent! Thank you
Thanks for the thorough list! That Jacques Attali interview is jaw-dropping. I quoted it extensively in my last piece (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier), as you know :-)
I saw that, and thank you for that link. I only had a couple of Attali's quotes cobbled together before that. It really leaves you speechless.
Indeed! I do wonder about the origins of the manipulated quote, which seemed too spot-on to be true and hence launched me into my investigation of the original French text. His actual quotes are sinister enough, they donтАЩt need any help when it comes to the grim, sociopathic socialist vision he describes!
I loved your comment on my last post, BTW. There were so many new comments after I managed to finally get some sleep, IтАЩm still trying to find time to respond to them all!
Great find on the Attali interview.
It was a *tour de force*! Your most provocative article yet :)
Aww, thanks, GJ ЁЯШМ When I posted it to social media, I introduced it as тАЬmy next incendiary letter, sure to offend many ;-)тАЭ
And by the hypothesis, do you mean the one essentially explained by Fitts? I appreciate that. But it does seem to be the elephant in the room, esp. in light of what is going on elsewhere, like Australia. I do not want to go down any conspiracy rabbit holes either, but I can't help but think there are some answers in there. Honestly, it would be great news at this point if this were merely about pharma profit-something to sink our teeth into and fight, but I fear its much bigger than that. Thank you for your response.