Saar Wilf and I are getting very close to finalizing an agreement to debate the question of whether the COVID vax has led to an increase or decrease in all-cause mortality.
I hope someone like John Ioniddis is doing a study looking at outcomes for vax vs. unvax of a large database like Kaiser Permanente. I think I would trust the results regardless of what the outcome was or at least take it into consideration given the mountain of information showing the dangerous mechanisms of the vax.
51 k people. Shows increasing probability of infection with increasing vaxx doses.
This could be an important line of argument. The vaccines, at least recently, increase the risk of testing positive. So how could a vaccine rollout save lives when the data shows the vaccines increase probability of contracting the virus?
All you need is Karen Kingston. The Kingston Report on Substack. She has been shouting from the rooftops and she brings the receipts!!! She has it all. https://karenkingston.substack.com/
Sorry Susan, bet 'Confrontation' is the opposite to 'Acceptance' ('Submission' or 'Capitulation'). Neither alternative to noisy and beligerant confrontation will enable us to avoid the inevitable consequences of the intended New World Order planned over decades by the 'Elite' (WEF).
Watch out, they'll claim either that there are not excess deaths, or that they're caused by Covid, or that they're caused by the unvaccinated. This is how the cult has been trained to view things.
You have probably seen this guy they are correlated results. It is so overwhelming obvious what’s going on. Another doctor did one recently. Was certain he new what was caused by vaccine injury vrs real Covid. I believe it’s the spike protein that isn’t fully expressed in the vaccine. All proteins are expressed when you catch Covid. Someone has a get those 2 guys together. Concrite the evidence. I will see if I can find the other video.
I hope that you are able to get top scientific minded people on this work project. They could be graduate students with high IQs and the right backgrounds. I wish I could be of help.
What is the point of this. Take the shot and suffer the consequences or refuse the shot. Losing your job for refusing the shot sucks but at least you will live
Many people are coming to an opinion about COVID that differs from the party line we’ve had shoved down our throats since early 2020.
There are studies undertaken by doctors that address COVID lethality and jab side effects, some by Pfizer. There are poems about the horrible social damage of the COVID story (I’m thinking of Margaret Anna Alice) and philosophical analysis by eugyppius. Dr. Dennis Rancourt wrote “what I believe about COVID” on Jan 4, 2021.
Is it time to compose and publish a corrected COVID story? I think the challenge will be in briefly describing the damage of the vaccine. Has anyone produced a list of references that document the individual damage? We do not need a history of the evolution of these understandings, although that would be useful and interesting, but a lot of work.
The corrected COVID story could be organized by: how did we learn about it, COVID comes to America, govt. response (quarantine, no treatment, wait for a vaccine), “vaccine” development and administration, censorship, errors, impact on democratic freedom, gains and losses, reality and origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, shortcomings/failures of the American public health “system” including the FDA and CDC.
Remember the early animations of “the virus”? To be kind, these were rushed explanations aimed at a non-medical, non-scientific public. In retrospect, they seem like so much misinformation and disinformation. In the meantime some scientists have admitted they do not think viruses actually exist outside of computer models. What is the public to make of this?
Through the last three years, the public has been subject to technical, supposedly scientific, explanations of viruses and viral infections as well as vaccination. I think the current medical/scientific understanding is different. Can we compose an explanation that fits the current understanding?
Pisses me off when called out for hypocrisy...at myself....hey I had too much coffee , gimme a break.
I hope someone like John Ioniddis is doing a study looking at outcomes for vax vs. unvax of a large database like Kaiser Permanente. I think I would trust the results regardless of what the outcome was or at least take it into consideration given the mountain of information showing the dangerous mechanisms of the vax.
MSM was still honest in 2009 (about the Swine Flu Scam) :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9qeLcq3y8w
(thanks to The Expose for pointing this out).
I recall that the toxicity of the spike protein was originally broached by a paper from the Salk Institute.
https://www.covid-datascience.com/profile/jeffreymorris/profile Jeffrey Morris is or was actively arguing against Steve, Malone, et al. Has he been dealt with. . . ?
https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/are-the-mrna-vaccines-really-safe-evaluating-claims-by-steven-kirsch-on-danger-of-spike-proteins
Here is someone who wants to argue with Steve. Has he been answered or contacted for debate?
And:
https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/what-does-usa-group-term-life-insurance-report-say-about-young-adult-excess-deaths-in-fall-2021
So I am assuming this thread is still 'live' on soliciting input for the slidedeck.
A preprint
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effectiveness-of-the-Coronavirus-Disease-2019-Shrestha-Burke/caa45fa88a217dc011341892cdfb41653f98e869
51 k people. Shows increasing probability of infection with increasing vaxx doses.
This could be an important line of argument. The vaccines, at least recently, increase the risk of testing positive. So how could a vaccine rollout save lives when the data shows the vaccines increase probability of contracting the virus?
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/two-years-covid-vaccines-prevented-millions-deaths-hospitalizations?fbclid=IwAR354ga2S7dnoFgNBNtZAcxYME1cPCy4qgmMxL8x8pu5c3xtOrRDShzTygE
There you go. Pay up.
All you need is Karen Kingston. The Kingston Report on Substack. She has been shouting from the rooftops and she brings the receipts!!! She has it all. https://karenkingston.substack.com/
Sorry Susan, bet 'Confrontation' is the opposite to 'Acceptance' ('Submission' or 'Capitulation'). Neither alternative to noisy and beligerant confrontation will enable us to avoid the inevitable consequences of the intended New World Order planned over decades by the 'Elite' (WEF).
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed = safer!
Watch out, they'll claim either that there are not excess deaths, or that they're caused by Covid, or that they're caused by the unvaccinated. This is how the cult has been trained to view things.
https://rumble.com/v2381ms-pathologist-proves-covid-vaccines-caused-deaths-drs-sucharit-bhakdi-and-arn.html
You have probably seen this guy they are correlated results. It is so overwhelming obvious what’s going on. Another doctor did one recently. Was certain he new what was caused by vaccine injury vrs real Covid. I believe it’s the spike protein that isn’t fully expressed in the vaccine. All proteins are expressed when you catch Covid. Someone has a get those 2 guys together. Concrite the evidence. I will see if I can find the other video.
I hope that you are able to get top scientific minded people on this work project. They could be graduate students with high IQs and the right backgrounds. I wish I could be of help.
I am lucky to live in Texas my husband is an ex-army. There is no way anyone in our family will take covid any other shots
What is the point of this. Take the shot and suffer the consequences or refuse the shot. Losing your job for refusing the shot sucks but at least you will live
Many people are coming to an opinion about COVID that differs from the party line we’ve had shoved down our throats since early 2020.
There are studies undertaken by doctors that address COVID lethality and jab side effects, some by Pfizer. There are poems about the horrible social damage of the COVID story (I’m thinking of Margaret Anna Alice) and philosophical analysis by eugyppius. Dr. Dennis Rancourt wrote “what I believe about COVID” on Jan 4, 2021.
Is it time to compose and publish a corrected COVID story? I think the challenge will be in briefly describing the damage of the vaccine. Has anyone produced a list of references that document the individual damage? We do not need a history of the evolution of these understandings, although that would be useful and interesting, but a lot of work.
The corrected COVID story could be organized by: how did we learn about it, COVID comes to America, govt. response (quarantine, no treatment, wait for a vaccine), “vaccine” development and administration, censorship, errors, impact on democratic freedom, gains and losses, reality and origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, shortcomings/failures of the American public health “system” including the FDA and CDC.
Remember the early animations of “the virus”? To be kind, these were rushed explanations aimed at a non-medical, non-scientific public. In retrospect, they seem like so much misinformation and disinformation. In the meantime some scientists have admitted they do not think viruses actually exist outside of computer models. What is the public to make of this?
Through the last three years, the public has been subject to technical, supposedly scientific, explanations of viruses and viral infections as well as vaccination. I think the current medical/scientific understanding is different. Can we compose an explanation that fits the current understanding?