794 Comments

You have access the the "experts" you say, you think are "so qualified" - you are bias in this regard - that is absolutely acceptable, but let's get your bias on the hot coals. Just how "scientific" are you prepared to be? You make out that your "experts" "know it all" - well I call you all COWARDS - unless you and your "experts" deal with this "no virus issue" then you are just as bad as all those who censor you - these under-qualified fools that don't "believe" as you do are so, so eager to put you and your "experts" in your place lol - just how confident are you and your "experts" really??? lol - seems to me that they've got you all running for the hills with your tails between your legs - or am I wrong??? - don't give me an nonsense excuse - prove to the world that you and your "experts" know what you're talking about, or just keep quiet, because I won't be interested in much more mumbo jumbo excuses.

Expand full comment

Under Canada you forgot Justin Trudeau

Expand full comment

Fauci warned in 2017 of a "surprise outbreak" that would occur during the Trump administration, and he said: "there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the area of infectious diseases", in a speech at Georgetown University Medical Center which was delivered just before Trump was inaugurated on 1/20/17.

China reported the 1st novel coronavirus death in 1/1/20. Did Fauci have a crystal ball to make his statements prior to & in 2017? NO! Did China secretly tell Fauci that they made & would release a corona virus in 2020? NO! Fauci is the US Government as he is the NIAID.NIH Director. How could Fauci have "predicted" the pandemic if he didn't have a hand in it? The NIH funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at China's Wuhan Lab. Based on the release of a recent NIH letter and revelations about EcoHealth Alliance, there is evidence that US taxpayers funded a project at the Wuhan lab that may have led to the Covid-19 pandemic. EcoHealth is a non-profit focused on finding unknown viruses in nature. NIH awarded $7.5 million in grants to EcoHealth Allicance. Since 2008, EcoHealth received $42 million in awards from the Pentagon and $13.17 million from the Department of Health and Human Services.

Expand full comment

Yes, the kind of confident prediction based on full knowledge of what is about to happen. Fauci is Defendant #1 in the Nuremberg 2.0 Crimes Against Humanity Trial.

Expand full comment

I think the front line doctor's or trying to save lives.But who cares what I think , we are living in a generation of know it all , and my way of thinking!

Expand full comment

Mr.Marshall ,I believe all of the one's involved should be held Accountable , so much has happened the past few years , it's unbelievable .

Expand full comment

Just wanted to thank David for putting that information out there . I don't think the US is responsible for the Virus .😇

Expand full comment

Not so sure Patsy C -if you believe like I do that Covid-19 was developed in that lab in China supported by money given to it by our Dr Fauci - think it kinda makes us a bit liable

Expand full comment

Mr Kirsch - you have provided a great platform and feel privileged to have taken part to express myself and interact with all the other good folks - hope we can get this COVID scam shut down before any more damage - very best to you.

Expand full comment

We have many journalists with large followings, such as Joshua Frank of "Counterpunch" who need to be debated, point by point: https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/01/14/vaccines-and-the-science-of-misinformation/ The cable TV talking heads and the newspapers trade on one another's methods and slams, without opportunities given for those they talk about to defend themselves. Something has got to give.

Expand full comment

I believe it was Peter Attia who mentioned in his 1/24 podcast that he wouldn’t want to have a discussion with you because you’d have information prepared & he’d need time to look it up and investigate in order to refute it. So I’m wondering if you’d give him your sources in advance. Of course, I’m sure he’d provide the same for you.

Expand full comment

I have submitted my request to have a discussion with Peter McCullough regarding one of his statements on the Joe Rogan show that I think is incorrect. See my previous comment and replies for a discussion of this. Let Steve know if you would like to see this happen.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

McCullough said at 2h 32m: "If it’s about making money, I’d almost prefer the [COVID-19] vaccines get full FDA approval. You know, none of the vaccines are FDA approved. Even Pfizer’s not FDA approved. That was a false talking point. Pfizer has a continuation of the EUA. BioNTech, which is not in the United States, got a biological licensing agreement. That still means they have to do a lot to get approved.... Another false talking point: that Pfizer was approved on August twenty-third. It went all the way up to the President of the United States. Since when in history do we have false talking points issued out of FDA meetings that go up to the President of the United States? So they’re not approved."

Wrong. When, on August 23, 2021, the FDA approved BioNTech's "Biologics License Application" to manufacture and distribute the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in the United States under the name Comirnaty for prevention of COVID-19 in individuals ages 16 and up, they did, in fact, "approve" the vaccine in common parlance. This is not something the Biden administration made up for a press release. This is language that the FDA itself uses. Approval of the BLA is exactly what people mean when they say a vaccine has "full approval" by the FDA. If McCullough is arguing the vaccine hasn't been fully approved, then by that logic the FDA has never approved any vaccine. I don't think that's what he meant. I had heard people argue that the "Comirnaty"-labeled vaccine was not available in the U.S., only its unbranded (and therefore unlicensed) equivalent. That's true, but that's a different argument.

FDA web page for Comirnaty. Note use of the word "approval." It is used in conjunction with the adult first two doses, while "authorized" is used for the "Emergency" uses (which confusingly also includes the unbranded vaccine for adult first two doses):

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

I'll be happy to address any questions or comments in case I don't win the chance to discuss this on video with Dr. McCullough himself.

Expand full comment
deletedFeb 6, 2022·edited Feb 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Correct, the licensed, Comirnaty-branded version is not available in the US. I’d heard and understood that before. But that’s not what McCullough said. He was saying there was no FDA approval at all, that getting license, the BLA approval, was some step on the way to “real” approval. No the FDA approved the vaccine (for adults, two doses) as much as it has ever approved any vaccine. If Pfizer wants to avoid marketing it under that name to avoid liability that’s a separate issue. But basically the FDA has declared that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe and effective and that licensed and unlicensed versions are safe and effective for two doses for ages 16 and up. They say the two “can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns.”

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna

Expand full comment

Steve, can you have someone on to talk about cancer risk due to vaccine? Its interesting that Biden is talking about doing cancer research at this time.

Expand full comment

TOTALLY AGREE. Boy, the timing is just... so... precious.

Expand full comment

It is curiously timely is it not? I guess being a decrepit old fart gives you remarkable insights. Must have something to do with being nearer to the spirit world.

Expand full comment

Dr Ryazan Cole from Idaho was the first I heard talk about it. He’s a pathologist

Expand full comment

Thanks for your reply Lordelas

Expand full comment

Steve: What happened to your planned debate on the existence of virus's? I understand the people whom you invited on the "no such thing as a virus" side have all volunteered to participate in the debate. Have the scientists on the other side of the debate also volunteered? Thanks.

Expand full comment

Which study shows LNP ends in Ovaries in high %? Malone said this.

Expand full comment

Dr Byram Bridle analyzed data from a Japanese FOIA type request of Pfizer data last summer. I believe he shared the data with Malone for his opinion. Dr Bridle is a Canadian virologist or vaccinologist I believe.

Expand full comment

Jeff Morris has debunked the majority of Steve's talking points on his Twitter and substack. You can read what he has to say here: https://twitter.com/jsm2334?lang=en

Expand full comment

I just Tweeted Dr. Morris letting him know Steve is interested in doing a public debate with his team. Let's see if he bites. I kind of doubt he will since it is so easily to set up strawman arguments with yourself on Twitter than actually have to stay on topic and deal with contrary facts in a live debate.

Expand full comment

Please encourage Jeff Morris to sign up for a debate.

Expand full comment

This right here from his website's "about" page debunks Jeff Morris as someone not compromised: "He has done extensive NIH and NSF-funded research on statistical data science methods for biomedical research....." One of the minions.

Expand full comment

Reality is much stranger than fiction today. Yeah, not comprised, works for the NIH. Unreal.

Expand full comment