Or not? Why would your "official numbers" be any more valid than the ones you deprecate?
Just off the top of my head (gotta go run meet one of my metalworker subs):
Florida's "population count" may be higher than insurance co's and official stats show. (LOTS of illegals and homeless likely did NOT get shots!) Certainly y'all's 'medical hea…
Or not? Why would your "official numbers" be any more valid than the ones you deprecate?
Just off the top of my head (gotta go run meet one of my metalworker subs):
Florida's "population count" may be higher than insurance co's and official stats show. (LOTS of illegals and homeless likely did NOT get shots!) Certainly y'all's 'medical head of state' is agitating a LOT against the bad shots...
Did you take into account the oldsters who died in 2020 (and after) from the brutal hospital "treatments"? Do, please, go read up at Steve Kirsch's substack: https://kirschsubstack.com/ . He has been digging through a huge variety of data 'pools' (as has Ed Dowd; also worth reading.) They and their teams do a LOT of work to validate as much as possible the data they are able to get.
The U.S. worker insurance co's had ALL committed to their payouts being ~40% excess after the shots were 'rolled out' (rolled over!). Since they have to pay out actual $$$, I would trust them more than any state's "official numbers." Granted: two immediate concerns with the data -- FLA is a big retirement state; LOTS of Floridians (and ex-NYers {snort}) are NOT insured by those co's cause they're retired. And the insurance co's did not (that I have looked for or seen) split their data out by state. All those biggies were *nation-wide* worker insurance co's. (So, confounders?)
But, for my 'anchor': if several of the biggies say they have paid out at 40% excess death; I'm going with THEIR numbers! Money talks, politicians lie!!
Or not? Why would your "official numbers" be any more valid than the ones you deprecate?
Just off the top of my head (gotta go run meet one of my metalworker subs):
Florida's "population count" may be higher than insurance co's and official stats show. (LOTS of illegals and homeless likely did NOT get shots!) Certainly y'all's 'medical head of state' is agitating a LOT against the bad shots...
Did you take into account the oldsters who died in 2020 (and after) from the brutal hospital "treatments"? Do, please, go read up at Steve Kirsch's substack: https://kirschsubstack.com/ . He has been digging through a huge variety of data 'pools' (as has Ed Dowd; also worth reading.) They and their teams do a LOT of work to validate as much as possible the data they are able to get.
The U.S. worker insurance co's had ALL committed to their payouts being ~40% excess after the shots were 'rolled out' (rolled over!). Since they have to pay out actual $$$, I would trust them more than any state's "official numbers." Granted: two immediate concerns with the data -- FLA is a big retirement state; LOTS of Floridians (and ex-NYers {snort}) are NOT insured by those co's cause they're retired. And the insurance co's did not (that I have looked for or seen) split their data out by state. All those biggies were *nation-wide* worker insurance co's. (So, confounders?)
But, for my 'anchor': if several of the biggies say they have paid out at 40% excess death; I'm going with THEIR numbers! Money talks, politicians lie!!