You wrote: "Furthermore, the Czech data shows that vaccinated and unvaccinated died in the same proportions during both high and no COVID periods."
But that's not true. The Czech data shows that during the Delta wave in November to December 2021, unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Estimate_of_lives_saved_by_vaccines_in_winter_2021_2022_based_on_all_cause_mortality. The ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated ASMR was about 2 in October 2021, but it increased to over 3 during the peak of the COVID wave in December 2021, and the ratio fell below 2 in April 2022 after the COVID wave in the winter had passed by.
Retsef Levi's paper should've also included a time series plot of monthly mortality with lines for vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Florida had particularly high mortality during the Delta wave in August to September 2021, so I bet during the Delta wave unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people.
I think currently the Medicare data you published in December 2023 is the biggest set of all-cause mortality data by vaccination status that is available for the United States. Your Medicare dataset includes 8,263,446 total deaths in 2020-2022, which is about 82% of the total deaths in the United States in 2020-2022 returned by CDC WONDER. But your Medicare data shows that unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in deaths during the Delta wave than vaccinated people: https://sars2.net/i/rootclaim-medicareraw.png.
First of all, it is thought that there is interference of the U.S. government where I see it globally, and nobody trusts Data of Medicare and VAERS.
As for the harmful phenomenon reported in VAERS in particular, the dead by the side effect, there are real 10% - around 1% and study.
A doctor does not have the reward of the report, and this is because doctor cannot but largely reduce time of the medical treatment.
This will be similar in all countries.
The people within two weeks after the inoculation were classified in non-inoculation by the clinical trial of Pfizer. If I am not mistaken, even the statistics of VAERS were the same. Terrible fake.
The example of the ship which entered Japanese Yokohama Port in February, 2020:
Those days when there was not yet the false vaccine.
DiamondPrincess: Infection 712 | Death 13 | All the embarkation 3,711
＝As for 19% of infection rates, infection case fatality rate 1.8% (partly some kind of treatment), 0.35% of overall infection death rate.
Conditions：(1) Wuhan stock which was slightly strong toxic, (2) there were many and retirement older age layer, (3)sealing state in the ship.
Overall infection death rate of past(before Cov19) average influenza of Japan was 0.19% in 60s,
80 years or older was around 1.73%, 0.05-0.09% at all age.
It cannot be said that it is more fatal than normal influenza if I think about a condition of (3) in particular.
> Florida had particularly high mortality during the Delta wave in August to September 2021, so I bet during the Delta wave unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people.<
If " unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people", was it because they were unvaXed, or because they were given even worse mal-treatment than the vaXed?
And, record keeping by hospitals during that time was very poor with phony PCR results, accident deaths being listed as cv19, etc., so how can any of this intentional mal-treatment accompanied with staff hysteria generate reliable numbers?
I think that there are many examples that the person who escaped dying has died in the United States. Because Anthony Fauci standardized treatment with Remdesivir. Around 40% are said to die of renal failure, liver failure when they use Remdesivir.
(I did not put down Link, but DR.Anne-Marie Yim resident in Luxembourg said.)
Fauci has the fact that affected an examination of Remdesivir, a conversion examination, and it is said that he has some stock of manufacturer Gilead company. I think that he had an intention to want to gain the money than another person may die. Many people dead farther than other treatment of this and are classified in infection death.
The United States seemed to use Protocol which did oxygen inhalation as soon as blood O2 density was low, but it was spoken that you must be careful because this is delicate, and Dr.Pierre Kory said this from the first.
The political power of the doctor was strong in Japan, and, as a result, the independency of the doctor was strong, and there was the hospital treated from the beginning of Cov19 in Ivermectin.
While false vaccine was recommended, the no inoculation man of my friend and relative was infected with Cov19, but was discharged from all by Steroid treatment in 2-7 days. There was not the fool doctor who prescribed Remdesivir. There might be the hospital which prescribed Remdesivir depending on a hospital.
However, the JP-government and advertising of MSM worked, and it has been in the country where Japan was the world, and eight times were the highest in both the inoculation rate and the inoculation number of times. In 2024, it increased to 117.2% when I set to 100 percent with all cause of death death tolls of 2019. A person of the United States is stronger in independent spirit, and it is revealed that it largely decreased after the inoculation three times in spite of a semiforced inoculation in Data. I want that the person of the United States supports J.F.Kennedy Jr. and to do medical care, medical care of America soundly. Because most free countries follow the United States about medical care.
I looked at the full period for no covid vs. COVID waves following. There should have been a huge difference and there was none. Was there an error in the calculation of my 1950 spreadsheet at the top of the ACM death date tab? That's the question. You haven't shown an error and nobody else has either.
Levi's paper was all about brand differential. Any honest scientist would admit that Pfizer increases your risk of death by 36%. That's the elephant in the room. How can you ignore that? Why are you not admitting these shots increased ACM?
Atanasov paper shows unvaccinated always have higher NCACM and it doesn't necessarily scale proportionally during a stress. DId you do a time series on the medicare data by age group? The cohorts dynamically change which makes comparisons hard.
As for the Medicare data with 8M deaths, all the files in the S3 server are excel files with <1M rows. A record level dataset with 8M deaths would be around 800M rows.
Kindly provide the path in the S3 server to the file with the 8M deaths.
1. After you added alternative high-COVID and low-COVID periods to your Czech spreadsheet, you also got a big difference between the periods: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Comment_by_Kirsch_at_Substack. For example the ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated mortality was about 4.29 during the high-COVID period on weeks 45-52 of 2021, but the ratio was about 2.92 during the low-COVID period on weeks 46-41 of 2021.
Your initial pair of periods was misleading, because your low-COVID period was much earlier than your high-COVID period, so your low-COVID period was more impacted by the temporal HVE, which ended up canceling out the difference in COVID mortality between the two periods.
2. A possible problem with Levi's paper is that even though the Moderna and Pfizer cohorts had the same number of people for each month of vaccination, most deaths were in older age groups, and the cohorts may have been imbalanced by month of vaccination if you only look at people aged 60+.
If you look at the adjusted instead of crude odds ratios, they are adjusted for imbalances between combinations of variables, like for vaccination month among people aged 60+. But the vaccination month was not included as a variable in the adjusted odds ratios.
The New Zealand, Czech, and Connecticut datasets have shown that the vaccination month has a huge effect on subsequent mortality: https://x.com/henjin256/status/1918128134785806347. So I think the vaccination month should've been included as a variable for the adjusted odds ratios.
Or alternatively the authors could've done a secondary analysis where they would've excluded people under the age of 60 before they formed the matched cohorts.
3. I meant the file `data-transparency/USA/Medicare/COVID vax jan feb mar 2021 plus ALL deaths in medicare per day.xlsx`. It's of course not record-level data, but it has one sheet that shows the daily number of deaths in all people and another sheet that shows the deaths in unvaccinated people. You can subtract the two sheets to get the daily number of deaths in vaccinated people.
The dynamic size of the cohorts is of course problematic, but even if you look at the raw number of deaths without adjusting for population size, it's easy to see that the bump in deaths during the Delta wave is much more pronounced in unvaccinated people. You can see my plot of the Medicare data side by side here with a similar plot of unadjusted raw deaths in the Czech data: https://sars2.net/czech4.html#Daily_raw_number_of_deaths_by_vaccination_status.
1. HVE doesn't last very long. And when deaths start moving the "wrong way" you know it's done being a factor. For 1950, it was "done" by week 20.
2. Your claim is not correct — it misunderstands what the adjusted model in the Florida study includes.
Here’s what the actual study says about the adjusted odds ratios:
“In addition to an indicator variable corresponding to the type of vaccine received … the regression models included the covariates used for matching, as well as covariates corresponding to components of the census tract-level social vulnerability index scores … and ZIP code-level five-year average mortality rate specific for the individual’s age, sex, and race.”
So yes, the adjusted odds ratios do include:
Age (5-year bins)
Sex
Race
Ethnicity
Month of vaccination (for second dose)
Vaccination site type (9 categories)
Census tract (for residential address)
SVI scores (social vulnerability index)
ZIP-code-level historical mortality
Where the confusion might come from:
Someone may have assumed that because vaccination month wasn’t listed separately in a regression output table, it wasn’t used — but the study explicitly says it was included as a covariate in the model. That means combinations like "people aged 60+ vaccinated in March" are indeed adjusted for.
🧠 Bottom line:
❌ The criticism is factually wrong: vaccination month was included in the adjusted model.
✅ The adjusted odds ratios account for all matching variables, including vaccination month.
✅ Therefore, comparisons like "60+ vaccinated in April vs. June" are appropriately controlled.
So are you ready to admit this is a disaster and the Pfizer vaccine must be stopped? The burden is on you and Jeffrey Morris at this point to show the confounder.
3. I've download the sheet and will look at it. You are correct, there is a bump during delta, but not for the vaccinated. But I think you may have missed the MAJOR problem which is both had mortality peaks during Omicron, and then the unvaccinated ACM dropped and the vaccinated ACM didn't. That gap is HUGE.
2. The text you quoted didn't say that the odds ratios were adjusted for the month of the second vaccine dose.
3. You're right that unvaccinated deaths are much higher in late 2021 than after the Omicron wave, but it's probably because vaccinated people were erroneously classified as unvaccinated until they got a booster dose, because the Medicare dataset was missing many records for primary course doses.
A note in the Medicare spreadsheet said: "Medicare does NOT have vaccination records for many people who got vaccinated outside of the Medicare system. Thus many people who appear 'unvaccinated' are not." [https://sars2.net/f/COVID_vax_jan_feb_mar_2021_plus_ALL_deaths_in_medicare_per_day.xlsx] And another note said: "Be careful when looking at first vaccination data after October 2021. It may in fact be a third shot but 'appear' to be a first shot due to record keeping errors."
Your Connecticut Medicare data has the same problem, where a lot of booster doses from October 2021 onwards are erroneously classified as first doses, because people were missing records for the primary course doses.
So in reality the people who are classified as unvaccinated consist of a mixture of unvaccinated and vaccinated people. But if the vaccinated people who were misclassified as unvaccinated have a similar mortality pattern as properly classified vaccinated people, then in a pure set of unvaccinated people the spike in deaths during the Delta wave would likely be even more pronounced.
Does the definition of "unvaccinated" include people who received at least one shot but died before their 2nd shot or before expiry of 14 days following their 2nd shot?
BC government just published a study dated April 2025 explaining why they think the vaccines remain valuable. Critical assessment of the study is below.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
Here is their conclusion extracted from their Abstract:
Conclusions: The significant reduction in COVID-related fatality rates among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region in association with vaccination uptake and effectiveness, hybrid immunity, and changing viral strains emphasizes the critical role of timely vaccinations in safeguarding vulnerable populations.
AI analysis quickly shows critical limitation.
Key limitation in one short quote , and then more full critique:
Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
Senior Review Panel & Peer Review Critique (AI): Vancouver Coastal Health LTC COVID-19 Mortality Study (BCMJ Vol 67, No. 3 dated April 2025)
1. Study Objective and Relevance
The study’s goal-to analyze COVID-19 case fatality rates among long-term care (LTC) residents-is important and addresses a vulnerable population. However, the report’s value is fundamentally limited by its omission of all-cause mortality (ACM) analysis for the full LTC population.
2. Critical Omission: All-Cause Mortality (ACM)
ACM is essential for three reasons:
• Error Checking:
ACM provides a direct way to verify the accuracy of cause-specific mortality data. If reported COVID-19 deaths are high but total deaths are stable, this suggests possible misclassification, under-reporting, or over-attribution. Conversely, if both rise together, it supports the validity of the findings.
• Reality Checking:
Only ACM can reveal the true impact of the pandemic and related policies on LTC residents. It captures both direct and indirect effects (e.g., deaths due to isolation, changes in care, or other causes). Without ACM, it is impossible to know whether COVID-19 or the interventions themselves had the greatest impact.
• Credibility and Public Trust:
Transparent reporting of ACM is a cornerstone of epidemiological best practice. Its absence raises questions about selective reporting, undermines the credibility of the study, and risks eroding public trust-especially when ACM data are available and have been used in other peer-reviewed studies.
3. Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
The Illusion of Transparency: COVID-19 Mortality Reporting in Long-Term Care
Introduction - Accurate and transparent reporting is essential for protecting society’s most vulnerable-especially those in long-term care (LTC) homes. This analysis examines the Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) report on COVID-19 fatalities in LTC homes (April 2025) and raises important questions about how data is presented to the public and policymakers. By focusing narrowly on COVID-19 case fatalities and reporting only 30-day all-cause mortality among COVID-positive residents, while omitting broader mortality trends for the entire LTC population, the report may unintentionally obscure the true impact of the pandemic and related policies. Understanding what is-and isn’t-included in these reports is crucial for learning from the pandemic and making better decisions in the future.
What Does the VCH Report Show? -The VCH report investigates deaths among LTC residents who tested positive for COVID-19 between January 2020 and June 2022, breaking the data down by pandemic wave and highlighting the drop in fatality rates after vaccines were introduced. Its main message is clear: vaccination significantly reduced the risk of death among LTC residents, and continued vaccination is recommended. Below, we examine whether this conclusion holds up when considering the complete data set.
What’s Missing and Why It Matters - The report does not address a fundamental question: Did more people in long-term care die overall during the pandemic compared to previous years? This is not a minor detail. All-cause mortality-the total number of deaths from any cause in the entire LTC population-is the most direct measure of the pandemic’s impact and the effectiveness of our response.
According to data from the BC Seniors’ Advocate, the annual death rate in LTC homes remained stable in 2020 and 2021, with no significant increase compared to 2019. In fact, the Seniors’ Advocate publicly confirmed there was “no” rise in deaths in 2020. There was only a modest increase in 2022, which quickly returned to baseline in 2023. These numbers suggest that, despite the challenges of COVID-19, overall mortality in LTC homes did not surge as many feared.
Why Comprehensive Data Is Essential - When reports, like the April 2025 VCH one, focus only on COVID-positive deaths or short-term all-cause mortality, without considering total mortality for all LTC residents, they risk giving an incomplete picture. This can affect how families, care workers, and policymakers understand the risks and benefits of interventions like strict visitation rules or vaccine mandates. Transparent, comprehensive data is not just a technical requirement-it’s a matter of public trust and sound decision-making.
A Call for Accountability and Improvement - This is not about assigning blame, but about learning and improving. To make informed decisions that truly protect those in care homes, future reports must include all-cause mortality for the entire LTC population and present the full context.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
What about this study. It is hard to convince a pro-vaxxer of anything, when a study like this exists. According to the study there seems to be a clear ACM benefit of the vaccine from day 8 to 180. Is that benefit real? I am pretty convinced that the vaccines in general did more harm than good, in fact i believe they only did harm, so how come there seem to be a positive effect here? Can anyone please explain me that? See fig. 3 of the report. The first two lines yield a positive vaccine efficacy wrt. ACM: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10579525/
>Nicole Schwab, daughter of Klaus Schwab, has been making significant statements and participating in discussions related to environmental and social issues. She has been involved in initiatives aimed at promoting a nature-positive economy and has been vocal about the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem restoration. For instance, she discussed the concept of a trillion trees platform at the World Economic Forum, which focuses on forest conservation and restoration efforts.
Recently, Schwab has been cooperating with prosecutors in a case against key figures of the global elite, revealing what she claims are plans for a systematic reduction of the global population.
These revelations have sparked fear among the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization, as they face potential legal consequences and loss of diplomatic immunity.
Schwab's actions and statements have also drawn criticism from some sources, with one article describing her as "unhinged" and her rhetoric as "creepy".
In addition to her work with the World Economic Forum, Schwab is a founding director of the Forum of Young Global Leaders and co-founder and president of the EDGE Certified Foundation, a global scheme certifying organizations for closing the gender gap in the workplace.<
Could the 2021 Australian vaccine death figures provide some degree of triangulation to the 470,000 estimate,
Australia uniquely had the vaccine before covid. Vaccine rolled out March 2021 - excess 2021 deaths were 10,300 for a 26million population roughly eq to 140,000 deaths for 350 million population.
140,000 deaths for a 9 month (March-December) period raises the estimated US vaccine deaths to 185,000 pa. Covid came to Australia in January 2022, therefore the 2021 excess deaths must be from the vaccine.
470,000 is for 4 years but not at a constant vaccination rate, the Australia figures estimate of185,000 estimate is for 2021 ie pa
Who's Copying Nuremberg 2.0? Mike Stone's (ViroLIEgy.com) last posts on Intro to Virology, Kary Mullis: Martyr or Menace? and "Virus-like" Particles. Although his research is commendable, his conclusions are exactly what I already posted many many years ago. I'm the first one to point out that 1) The virus is fake 2) The PCR test and Antibody Tests were both fake and 3) that SEM Microscope Images are fake and unreliable, on February 25th 2020. Will The Real Bird Flu Images Please Stand Up https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/will-the-real-bird-flu-please-stand
(SNIP) 14) No authentic pictures exist of Coronavirus; without a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) or TEM Microscope and Photoshop. SARS-2 Photoshop Cartoon
February 28th 2020 Trump Censorship Program: Fauci admits censorship of Chris Edwards March 13th 2016 by Cambridge Analytica; Rise Of The Jedi Podcast Dec 26 2019 & Tesla Leaks 2.0 February 25th 2020 "Covid Hoax" Post! https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/trump-censorship-program-fauci-admits
(SNIP)2) Coronaviruses are types of viruses?? 3) Viruses are too small to see with a light microscope — only seen with Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) detector in a scanning electron microscope 4) See these examples of HIV imagery. If some images are colored for scientific purposes, and others altered for aesthetic reasons, how can a viewer tell the difference? #NASA #PHOTOSHOP https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/youve-never-really-seen-a-virus-until-you-see-this/
Surely, he's not on my email list. Oh wait, yes he is. I own a digital marketing company. I have plenty of contact lists.
I'm the one who has been pubishing daily news since December 22nd 2019, 30,000 news stories, beginning a day after the mysterious Pneumonia Patient appeard in China. https://nurembergtrials.net/daily-news
Then, I started a Nuremberg 2.0 Zoom on July 4th 2021 which garnered 300,000 views on that day, a full year before Reiner Fuellmich's "Grand Jury". The next day, Zoom cancelled my Zoom account. https://nurembergtrials.net/july-4th-2021-on-zoom
Alex Jones, via Greg Reese, copied my website, a full month after the website started in May; giving credit to the Scientologist fraud, Reiner Fuellmich for the idea. Further copying a post I made on February 9th 2021, announcing my upcoming Nuremberg 2.0, on my website TeslaLeaks.com; before it became a Godaddy Webbuilder website. Yet, neither gave credit to NurembergTrials.net. Surely, they were both on my email list, as-are 4000 other members of the press, 3000 subscribers of Nuremberg 2.0, and 10,000 others that came from very targeted contact lists. (not Substack subscribers)
August 16th 2022 RISE OF THE JEDI PODCAST EPISODE 6 PT1 - CHIEF JUSTICE PREDICTS ALL PARTS OF COVID HOAX 12/26/19 1AM predicted Covid Hoax hours before the fake virus was given a name (SARS-COV2) from China, December 27th 2019 https://bitchute.com/video/CoYNr5FxEQrQ/
1) New World Order, Great Reset, Tesla vs Gas, Free Energy, Controlling Countries w/ Food & Energy, Staged Wars, Lockdowns /w Walmart Open, Presidential Directives, Emergency Orders, Vaccine BioWeapons, BioTerror, Fear, Crisis, Order out of Chaos, Invisible, Phantom Virus, Forced Injections, Quarantine, FEMA Camps, Darth Vader & Stormtrooper Masks, Fake News, Fake Science, Information Wars, Cancel Culture, Military Industrial Complex, Scientific Technocratic Elite, Sovereign Countries & Companies (Pfizer), Government is God, Fiat Currency...
You see this post on June 10th 2021? I'm the one that pointed out the fraud in the Genetics and Origins of Covid-19 and the Fake Tests; coincidentally, Andrew Kaufman vs Steve Kirsch debate; he cites exactly what I wrote; 3 years earlier... https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/great-no-virus-debate-w-dr-andrew
In case you were asking, I also published 13,000 pages on Nikola Tesla, more than anyone in the history of the world; embodied in my book "The Magical Inventions Of Nikola Tesla". https://teslaleaks.com/ If you think someone on Earth is smarter than me, think again! https://nurembergtrials.net/who-is-the-chief-justice
This should be easy: the origins of SARS CoV-2 can’t be confirmed by any of the currently available methods.
1. It could not have come from nature, because nature doesn’t have the mechanism to produce SARS CoV-2. So, if anyone claims this to be true is a lair.
2. SARS CoV-2 could not have come from a lab, even a Chinese lab. How do we know it? Ralph S. Barci admitted himself viruses are not infectious when injected into cells. Billions would be needed to fix this problem…
3. The shots should have been stoped the moment people like you and Kevin M. Realized SARS CoV-2 was a scam… There is no redemption for people like that….
This essay pretty much seals the deal, it’s impossible to logically argue against it. That means one logical conclusion is that the conspirators organizing this tragedy were interested in raising the death rate. They had to understand what they were doing. Hopefully criminal prosecutions will come out of this research
On my last doctor’s visit my physician was really pressuring me to get a tetanus shot. She has never pressured me about the Covid jab or any other vaccines before but I can’t trust what’s in any shot anymore. I won’t be getting it.
It sounds pretty fishy to me. I am just now getting over my spring cold. At 57, historically, I usually get too cold each year. Some are worse than others.
Yes, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has extended liability protections under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act for COVID-19 countermeasures-including vaccines, treatments, and tests-through December 31, 2029[2][3][5][7]. This extension provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare providers involved in the development, administration, and use of these products. The extension aims to ensure ongoing preparedness for future COVID-19 outbreaks, even though the official public health emergency ended in May 2023, because COVID-19 still poses a credible risk of a future public health emergency[3][5][6].
It's so obvious and so simple. If any person or company/manufacturer refuses to debate something, then they have something to hide. In this case they are hiding death, injury, malpractice, fraud and much more. So many lies and so much corruption by "vaccine" manufacturers, governments and "health" practitioners it's unbelievable. Money rules over health, safety and morals...
You wrote: "Furthermore, the Czech data shows that vaccinated and unvaccinated died in the same proportions during both high and no COVID periods."
But that's not true. The Czech data shows that during the Delta wave in November to December 2021, unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Estimate_of_lives_saved_by_vaccines_in_winter_2021_2022_based_on_all_cause_mortality. The ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated ASMR was about 2 in October 2021, but it increased to over 3 during the peak of the COVID wave in December 2021, and the ratio fell below 2 in April 2022 after the COVID wave in the winter had passed by.
Retsef Levi's paper should've also included a time series plot of monthly mortality with lines for vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Florida had particularly high mortality during the Delta wave in August to September 2021, so I bet during the Delta wave unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people.
I think currently the Medicare data you published in December 2023 is the biggest set of all-cause mortality data by vaccination status that is available for the United States. Your Medicare dataset includes 8,263,446 total deaths in 2020-2022, which is about 82% of the total deaths in the United States in 2020-2022 returned by CDC WONDER. But your Medicare data shows that unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in deaths during the Delta wave than vaccinated people: https://sars2.net/i/rootclaim-medicareraw.png.
First of all, it is thought that there is interference of the U.S. government where I see it globally, and nobody trusts Data of Medicare and VAERS.
As for the harmful phenomenon reported in VAERS in particular, the dead by the side effect, there are real 10% - around 1% and study.
A doctor does not have the reward of the report, and this is because doctor cannot but largely reduce time of the medical treatment.
This will be similar in all countries.
The people within two weeks after the inoculation were classified in non-inoculation by the clinical trial of Pfizer. If I am not mistaken, even the statistics of VAERS were the same. Terrible fake.
The example of the ship which entered Japanese Yokohama Port in February, 2020:
Those days when there was not yet the false vaccine.
DiamondPrincess: Infection 712 | Death 13 | All the embarkation 3,711
＝As for 19% of infection rates, infection case fatality rate 1.8% (partly some kind of treatment), 0.35% of overall infection death rate.
Conditions：(1) Wuhan stock which was slightly strong toxic, (2) there were many and retirement older age layer, (3)sealing state in the ship.
Overall infection death rate of past(before Cov19) average influenza of Japan was 0.19% in 60s,
80 years or older was around 1.73%, 0.05-0.09% at all age.
It cannot be said that it is more fatal than normal influenza if I think about a condition of (3) in particular.
> Florida had particularly high mortality during the Delta wave in August to September 2021, so I bet during the Delta wave unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people.<
If " unvaccinated people had a much bigger increase in mortality than vaccinated people", was it because they were unvaXed, or because they were given even worse mal-treatment than the vaXed?
And, record keeping by hospitals during that time was very poor with phony PCR results, accident deaths being listed as cv19, etc., so how can any of this intentional mal-treatment accompanied with staff hysteria generate reliable numbers?
I think that there are many examples that the person who escaped dying has died in the United States. Because Anthony Fauci standardized treatment with Remdesivir. Around 40% are said to die of renal failure, liver failure when they use Remdesivir.
(I did not put down Link, but DR.Anne-Marie Yim resident in Luxembourg said.)
Fauci has the fact that affected an examination of Remdesivir, a conversion examination, and it is said that he has some stock of manufacturer Gilead company. I think that he had an intention to want to gain the money than another person may die. Many people dead farther than other treatment of this and are classified in infection death.
The United States seemed to use Protocol which did oxygen inhalation as soon as blood O2 density was low, but it was spoken that you must be careful because this is delicate, and Dr.Pierre Kory said this from the first.
The political power of the doctor was strong in Japan, and, as a result, the independency of the doctor was strong, and there was the hospital treated from the beginning of Cov19 in Ivermectin.
While false vaccine was recommended, the no inoculation man of my friend and relative was infected with Cov19, but was discharged from all by Steroid treatment in 2-7 days. There was not the fool doctor who prescribed Remdesivir. There might be the hospital which prescribed Remdesivir depending on a hospital.
However, the JP-government and advertising of MSM worked, and it has been in the country where Japan was the world, and eight times were the highest in both the inoculation rate and the inoculation number of times. In 2024, it increased to 117.2% when I set to 100 percent with all cause of death death tolls of 2019. A person of the United States is stronger in independent spirit, and it is revealed that it largely decreased after the inoculation three times in spite of a semiforced inoculation in Data. I want that the person of the United States supports J.F.Kennedy Jr. and to do medical care, medical care of America soundly. Because most free countries follow the United States about medical care.
I looked at the full period for no covid vs. COVID waves following. There should have been a huge difference and there was none. Was there an error in the calculation of my 1950 spreadsheet at the top of the ACM death date tab? That's the question. You haven't shown an error and nobody else has either.
Levi's paper was all about brand differential. Any honest scientist would admit that Pfizer increases your risk of death by 36%. That's the elephant in the room. How can you ignore that? Why are you not admitting these shots increased ACM?
Atanasov paper shows unvaccinated always have higher NCACM and it doesn't necessarily scale proportionally during a stress. DId you do a time series on the medicare data by age group? The cohorts dynamically change which makes comparisons hard.
As for the Medicare data with 8M deaths, all the files in the S3 server are excel files with <1M rows. A record level dataset with 8M deaths would be around 800M rows.
Kindly provide the path in the S3 server to the file with the 8M deaths.
1. After you added alternative high-COVID and low-COVID periods to your Czech spreadsheet, you also got a big difference between the periods: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Comment_by_Kirsch_at_Substack. For example the ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated mortality was about 4.29 during the high-COVID period on weeks 45-52 of 2021, but the ratio was about 2.92 during the low-COVID period on weeks 46-41 of 2021.
Your initial pair of periods was misleading, because your low-COVID period was much earlier than your high-COVID period, so your low-COVID period was more impacted by the temporal HVE, which ended up canceling out the difference in COVID mortality between the two periods.
2. A possible problem with Levi's paper is that even though the Moderna and Pfizer cohorts had the same number of people for each month of vaccination, most deaths were in older age groups, and the cohorts may have been imbalanced by month of vaccination if you only look at people aged 60+.
If you look at the adjusted instead of crude odds ratios, they are adjusted for imbalances between combinations of variables, like for vaccination month among people aged 60+. But the vaccination month was not included as a variable in the adjusted odds ratios.
The New Zealand, Czech, and Connecticut datasets have shown that the vaccination month has a huge effect on subsequent mortality: https://x.com/henjin256/status/1918128134785806347. So I think the vaccination month should've been included as a variable for the adjusted odds ratios.
Or alternatively the authors could've done a secondary analysis where they would've excluded people under the age of 60 before they formed the matched cohorts.
3. I meant the file `data-transparency/USA/Medicare/COVID vax jan feb mar 2021 plus ALL deaths in medicare per day.xlsx`. It's of course not record-level data, but it has one sheet that shows the daily number of deaths in all people and another sheet that shows the deaths in unvaccinated people. You can subtract the two sheets to get the daily number of deaths in vaccinated people.
The dynamic size of the cohorts is of course problematic, but even if you look at the raw number of deaths without adjusting for population size, it's easy to see that the bump in deaths during the Delta wave is much more pronounced in unvaccinated people. You can see my plot of the Medicare data side by side here with a similar plot of unadjusted raw deaths in the Czech data: https://sars2.net/czech4.html#Daily_raw_number_of_deaths_by_vaccination_status.
Responding to all three points:
1. HVE doesn't last very long. And when deaths start moving the "wrong way" you know it's done being a factor. For 1950, it was "done" by week 20.
2. Your claim is not correct — it misunderstands what the adjusted model in the Florida study includes.
Here’s what the actual study says about the adjusted odds ratios:
“In addition to an indicator variable corresponding to the type of vaccine received … the regression models included the covariates used for matching, as well as covariates corresponding to components of the census tract-level social vulnerability index scores … and ZIP code-level five-year average mortality rate specific for the individual’s age, sex, and race.”
So yes, the adjusted odds ratios do include:
Age (5-year bins)
Sex
Race
Ethnicity
Month of vaccination (for second dose)
Vaccination site type (9 categories)
Census tract (for residential address)
SVI scores (social vulnerability index)
ZIP-code-level historical mortality
Where the confusion might come from:
Someone may have assumed that because vaccination month wasn’t listed separately in a regression output table, it wasn’t used — but the study explicitly says it was included as a covariate in the model. That means combinations like "people aged 60+ vaccinated in March" are indeed adjusted for.
🧠 Bottom line:
❌ The criticism is factually wrong: vaccination month was included in the adjusted model.
✅ The adjusted odds ratios account for all matching variables, including vaccination month.
✅ Therefore, comparisons like "60+ vaccinated in April vs. June" are appropriately controlled.
So are you ready to admit this is a disaster and the Pfizer vaccine must be stopped? The burden is on you and Jeffrey Morris at this point to show the confounder.
3. I've download the sheet and will look at it. You are correct, there is a bump during delta, but not for the vaccinated. But I think you may have missed the MAJOR problem which is both had mortality peaks during Omicron, and then the unvaccinated ACM dropped and the vaccinated ACM didn't. That gap is HUGE.
1. You can estimate the magnitude of the HVE over time by plotting a ratio of unvaccinated ASMR divided by vaccinated ASMR. The ratio follows a curve that takes until the second half of 2022 to flatten out: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Estimate_of_lives_saved_by_vaccines_in_winter_2021_2022_based_on_all_cause_mortality. The ratio is initially over 3 in April and May of 2021, but it stabilizes around 1.7 in the second half of 2022.
The ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated ASMR also follows a similar curve in the Dutch CBS data: https://sars2.net/rootclaim3.html#Comparison_to_Dutch_CBS_data.
2. The text you quoted didn't say that the odds ratios were adjusted for the month of the second vaccine dose.
3. You're right that unvaccinated deaths are much higher in late 2021 than after the Omicron wave, but it's probably because vaccinated people were erroneously classified as unvaccinated until they got a booster dose, because the Medicare dataset was missing many records for primary course doses.
A note in the Medicare spreadsheet said: "Medicare does NOT have vaccination records for many people who got vaccinated outside of the Medicare system. Thus many people who appear 'unvaccinated' are not." [https://sars2.net/f/COVID_vax_jan_feb_mar_2021_plus_ALL_deaths_in_medicare_per_day.xlsx] And another note said: "Be careful when looking at first vaccination data after October 2021. It may in fact be a third shot but 'appear' to be a first shot due to record keeping errors."
Your Connecticut Medicare data has the same problem, where a lot of booster doses from October 2021 onwards are erroneously classified as first doses, because people were missing records for the primary course doses.
So in reality the people who are classified as unvaccinated consist of a mixture of unvaccinated and vaccinated people. But if the vaccinated people who were misclassified as unvaccinated have a similar mortality pattern as properly classified vaccinated people, then in a pure set of unvaccinated people the spike in deaths during the Delta wave would likely be even more pronounced.
Does the definition of "unvaccinated" include people who received at least one shot but died before their 2nd shot or before expiry of 14 days following their 2nd shot?
I have read that it was the people in power that made staff put cause of Death as COVID,!!!
Steve, I love your work and appreciate it very much. There is something I don't understand in this article, related to the Florida study.
It shows in the study the All Cause Mortality between Pfizer and Moderna were: 847.2 vs. 617.9 deaths per 100,000.
For Florida, in 2021 the All Cause Mortality was 802.9.
Pfizer is higher, but Moderna was lower? Is that actually saying that Moderna reduced ACM? I find that unlikely. Can you help me understand this?
BC government just published a study dated April 2025 explaining why they think the vaccines remain valuable. Critical assessment of the study is below.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
https://bcmj.org/articles/covid-19-fatalities-among-long-term-care-residents-vancouver-coastal-health-region
Here is their conclusion extracted from their Abstract:
Conclusions: The significant reduction in COVID-related fatality rates among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region in association with vaccination uptake and effectiveness, hybrid immunity, and changing viral strains emphasizes the critical role of timely vaccinations in safeguarding vulnerable populations.
AI analysis quickly shows critical limitation.
Key limitation in one short quote , and then more full critique:
Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
Senior Review Panel & Peer Review Critique (AI): Vancouver Coastal Health LTC COVID-19 Mortality Study (BCMJ Vol 67, No. 3 dated April 2025)
1. Study Objective and Relevance
The study’s goal-to analyze COVID-19 case fatality rates among long-term care (LTC) residents-is important and addresses a vulnerable population. However, the report’s value is fundamentally limited by its omission of all-cause mortality (ACM) analysis for the full LTC population.
2. Critical Omission: All-Cause Mortality (ACM)
ACM is essential for three reasons:
• Error Checking:
ACM provides a direct way to verify the accuracy of cause-specific mortality data. If reported COVID-19 deaths are high but total deaths are stable, this suggests possible misclassification, under-reporting, or over-attribution. Conversely, if both rise together, it supports the validity of the findings.
• Reality Checking:
Only ACM can reveal the true impact of the pandemic and related policies on LTC residents. It captures both direct and indirect effects (e.g., deaths due to isolation, changes in care, or other causes). Without ACM, it is impossible to know whether COVID-19 or the interventions themselves had the greatest impact.
• Credibility and Public Trust:
Transparent reporting of ACM is a cornerstone of epidemiological best practice. Its absence raises questions about selective reporting, undermines the credibility of the study, and risks eroding public trust-especially when ACM data are available and have been used in other peer-reviewed studies.
3. Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
The Illusion of Transparency: COVID-19 Mortality Reporting in Long-Term Care
Introduction - Accurate and transparent reporting is essential for protecting society’s most vulnerable-especially those in long-term care (LTC) homes. This analysis examines the Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) report on COVID-19 fatalities in LTC homes (April 2025) and raises important questions about how data is presented to the public and policymakers. By focusing narrowly on COVID-19 case fatalities and reporting only 30-day all-cause mortality among COVID-positive residents, while omitting broader mortality trends for the entire LTC population, the report may unintentionally obscure the true impact of the pandemic and related policies. Understanding what is-and isn’t-included in these reports is crucial for learning from the pandemic and making better decisions in the future.
What Does the VCH Report Show? -The VCH report investigates deaths among LTC residents who tested positive for COVID-19 between January 2020 and June 2022, breaking the data down by pandemic wave and highlighting the drop in fatality rates after vaccines were introduced. Its main message is clear: vaccination significantly reduced the risk of death among LTC residents, and continued vaccination is recommended. Below, we examine whether this conclusion holds up when considering the complete data set.
What’s Missing and Why It Matters - The report does not address a fundamental question: Did more people in long-term care die overall during the pandemic compared to previous years? This is not a minor detail. All-cause mortality-the total number of deaths from any cause in the entire LTC population-is the most direct measure of the pandemic’s impact and the effectiveness of our response.
According to data from the BC Seniors’ Advocate, the annual death rate in LTC homes remained stable in 2020 and 2021, with no significant increase compared to 2019. In fact, the Seniors’ Advocate publicly confirmed there was “no” rise in deaths in 2020. There was only a modest increase in 2022, which quickly returned to baseline in 2023. These numbers suggest that, despite the challenges of COVID-19, overall mortality in LTC homes did not surge as many feared.
Why Comprehensive Data Is Essential - When reports, like the April 2025 VCH one, focus only on COVID-positive deaths or short-term all-cause mortality, without considering total mortality for all LTC residents, they risk giving an incomplete picture. This can affect how families, care workers, and policymakers understand the risks and benefits of interventions like strict visitation rules or vaccine mandates. Transparent, comprehensive data is not just a technical requirement-it’s a matter of public trust and sound decision-making.
A Call for Accountability and Improvement - This is not about assigning blame, but about learning and improving. To make informed decisions that truly protect those in care homes, future reports must include all-cause mortality for the entire LTC population and present the full context.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
Thanks for this another excellent article..
🙏🙏
The Bible prophesied 7-year Tribulation is at humanity's doorstep & the time to escape is very short. To read more, pls visit https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/
What about this study. It is hard to convince a pro-vaxxer of anything, when a study like this exists. According to the study there seems to be a clear ACM benefit of the vaccine from day 8 to 180. Is that benefit real? I am pretty convinced that the vaccines in general did more harm than good, in fact i believe they only did harm, so how come there seem to be a positive effect here? Can anyone please explain me that? See fig. 3 of the report. The first two lines yield a positive vaccine efficacy wrt. ACM: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10579525/
This might prove to be of interest if recent reporting is accurate.
xx
Klaus Schwab's Daughter Confesses: 'WEF Plans to Murder Billions of People'
https://rumble.com/v6srfnz-klaus-schwabs-daughter-confesses-wef-plans-to-murder-billions-of-people.html
xxx
Leo AI output re. Nicole Schwab:
>Nicole Schwab, daughter of Klaus Schwab, has been making significant statements and participating in discussions related to environmental and social issues. She has been involved in initiatives aimed at promoting a nature-positive economy and has been vocal about the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem restoration. For instance, she discussed the concept of a trillion trees platform at the World Economic Forum, which focuses on forest conservation and restoration efforts.
Recently, Schwab has been cooperating with prosecutors in a case against key figures of the global elite, revealing what she claims are plans for a systematic reduction of the global population.
These revelations have sparked fear among the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization, as they face potential legal consequences and loss of diplomatic immunity.
Schwab's actions and statements have also drawn criticism from some sources, with one article describing her as "unhinged" and her rhetoric as "creepy".
In addition to her work with the World Economic Forum, Schwab is a founding director of the Forum of Young Global Leaders and co-founder and president of the EDGE Certified Foundation, a global scheme certifying organizations for closing the gender gap in the workplace.<
Might be interesting
Could the 2021 Australian vaccine death figures provide some degree of triangulation to the 470,000 estimate,
Australia uniquely had the vaccine before covid. Vaccine rolled out March 2021 - excess 2021 deaths were 10,300 for a 26million population roughly eq to 140,000 deaths for 350 million population.
140,000 deaths for a 9 month (March-December) period raises the estimated US vaccine deaths to 185,000 pa. Covid came to Australia in January 2022, therefore the 2021 excess deaths must be from the vaccine.
470,000 is for 4 years but not at a constant vaccination rate, the Australia figures estimate of185,000 estimate is for 2021 ie pa
Excess vaccine death evidence - first 4 minutes of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UR1X9O2lMlA
Who's Copying Nuremberg 2.0? Mike Stone's (ViroLIEgy.com) last posts on Intro to Virology, Kary Mullis: Martyr or Menace? and "Virus-like" Particles. Although his research is commendable, his conclusions are exactly what I already posted many many years ago. I'm the first one to point out that 1) The virus is fake 2) The PCR test and Antibody Tests were both fake and 3) that SEM Microscope Images are fake and unreliable, on February 25th 2020. Will The Real Bird Flu Images Please Stand Up https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/will-the-real-bird-flu-please-stand
(SNIP) February 9th 2021 66.6 Ways Covid a full-blown Hoax by Tesla Leaks, 2/9/21 w/ Cures https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/666-ways-covid-19-is-a-full-blown-hoax-by-tesla-leaks-2921
(SNIP) 14) No authentic pictures exist of Coronavirus; without a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) or TEM Microscope and Photoshop. SARS-2 Photoshop Cartoon
February 28th 2020 Trump Censorship Program: Fauci admits censorship of Chris Edwards March 13th 2016 by Cambridge Analytica; Rise Of The Jedi Podcast Dec 26 2019 & Tesla Leaks 2.0 February 25th 2020 "Covid Hoax" Post! https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/trump-censorship-program-fauci-admits
(SNIP)2) Coronaviruses are types of viruses?? 3) Viruses are too small to see with a light microscope — only seen with Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) detector in a scanning electron microscope 4) See these examples of HIV imagery. If some images are colored for scientific purposes, and others altered for aesthetic reasons, how can a viewer tell the difference? #NASA #PHOTOSHOP https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/youve-never-really-seen-a-virus-until-you-see-this/
Surely, he's not on my email list. Oh wait, yes he is. I own a digital marketing company. I have plenty of contact lists.
Who invented the idea of a "Nuremberg 2.0" a new International Public Grand Jury vs Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity - Recap https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/who-invented-the-idea-of-a-nuremberg
I'm the one who has been pubishing daily news since December 22nd 2019, 30,000 news stories, beginning a day after the mysterious Pneumonia Patient appeard in China. https://nurembergtrials.net/daily-news
I then predicted 33 aspects of the Covid Scenario on December 26th 2019 at 1AM on my Rise of the Jedi Podcast (while the entire world was dreaming about the coal they just got from Santa Clause, and the day before SARS-Cov2 was even given a name). On December 27th 2019, still on the Facebook Timeline, I published that 1) Mandatory vaccines were coming 2) The vaccines were the Bioweapon 3) The patents for "virus's" were fake and "not even God could read them". ((Minus, all the BLANK Posts; as Facebook deleted my Admin posts from the account that was removed. )) https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F96e1dd4e-a09c-4860-a98c-3d894552400c_460x639.png
https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/chief-justice-predicts-covid-rise-of-the-jedi-podcast-122619 (notice how this link disappears when you click on it. Google is censoring all my pages; even in the browser; and in the Archive.org. Those pages do-exist.) The YouTube account with the original video's was deleted by YouTube, but recreated for you on Bitchute below. ((Notice how all the links work when reposted on Substack, but NOT in Google, NOT in your Browser and NOT in the Archive)) Nuremberg 2.0 Backup of 622 Blog Posts from 2021-2025 & Daily News 2019-2025 due to Google's removal of these pages and disappearing them from Archive.org (NurembergTrials.net) https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/nuremberg-20-backup-of-622-blog-posts
My Rise Of The Jedi Podcast was shared with 30,000 friends and followers, which quickly went to 1000 like's and 1000 shares @ https://facebook.com/riseofthejedi . I was first-to-post on the "Covid Hoax" on February 25th 2020; and Donald Trump, Ron Paul & David Icke used those exact words, days to weeks later. I guess they didn't copy my exact words "Covid is a Hoax" either right? https://img1.wsimg.com/isteam/ip/918f07ac-1db0-4331-beb6-38981fc22c54/Coronavirus%20Hoax%20Banned.JPG/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1280/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1280
By January 5th 2021, just as I was predicting the False-Flag Stand-Down at the Capitol, Facebook deleted my entire Facebook Admin, which had 10,000 posts and 330,000 like's and shares since July 2016. You didn't see it, because it was deleted... https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/918f07ac-1db0-4331-beb6-38981fc22c54/downloads/Tesla%20Leaks%202-0%20Facebook%20Group%20Posts%20and%20Comme.pdf?ver=1651644350352
Then, I started a Nuremberg 2.0 Zoom on July 4th 2021 which garnered 300,000 views on that day, a full year before Reiner Fuellmich's "Grand Jury". The next day, Zoom cancelled my Zoom account. https://nurembergtrials.net/july-4th-2021-on-zoom
Alex Jones, via Greg Reese, copied my website, a full month after the website started in May; giving credit to the Scientologist fraud, Reiner Fuellmich for the idea. Further copying a post I made on February 9th 2021, announcing my upcoming Nuremberg 2.0, on my website TeslaLeaks.com; before it became a Godaddy Webbuilder website. Yet, neither gave credit to NurembergTrials.net. Surely, they were both on my email list, as-are 4000 other members of the press, 3000 subscribers of Nuremberg 2.0, and 10,000 others that came from very targeted contact lists. (not Substack subscribers)
August 16th 2022 RISE OF THE JEDI PODCAST EPISODE 6 PT1 - CHIEF JUSTICE PREDICTS ALL PARTS OF COVID HOAX 12/26/19 1AM predicted Covid Hoax hours before the fake virus was given a name (SARS-COV2) from China, December 27th 2019 https://bitchute.com/video/CoYNr5FxEQrQ/
1) New World Order, Great Reset, Tesla vs Gas, Free Energy, Controlling Countries w/ Food & Energy, Staged Wars, Lockdowns /w Walmart Open, Presidential Directives, Emergency Orders, Vaccine BioWeapons, BioTerror, Fear, Crisis, Order out of Chaos, Invisible, Phantom Virus, Forced Injections, Quarantine, FEMA Camps, Darth Vader & Stormtrooper Masks, Fake News, Fake Science, Information Wars, Cancel Culture, Military Industrial Complex, Scientific Technocratic Elite, Sovereign Countries & Companies (Pfizer), Government is God, Fiat Currency...
https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/chief-justice-predicts-covid-rise-of-the-jedi-podcast-122619
You see this post on June 10th 2021? I'm the one that pointed out the fraud in the Genetics and Origins of Covid-19 and the Fake Tests; coincidentally, Andrew Kaufman vs Steve Kirsch debate; he cites exactly what I wrote; 3 years earlier... https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/great-no-virus-debate-w-dr-andrew
Origins of Covid19 - Common Cold, Guano, Pangolin or Bioweapon! https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/origins-of-coronavirus---the-common-cold-bat-guano-or-pangolin
In case you were asking, I also published 13,000 pages on Nikola Tesla, more than anyone in the history of the world; embodied in my book "The Magical Inventions Of Nikola Tesla". https://teslaleaks.com/ If you think someone on Earth is smarter than me, think again! https://nurembergtrials.net/who-is-the-chief-justice
This should be easy: the origins of SARS CoV-2 can’t be confirmed by any of the currently available methods.
1. It could not have come from nature, because nature doesn’t have the mechanism to produce SARS CoV-2. So, if anyone claims this to be true is a lair.
2. SARS CoV-2 could not have come from a lab, even a Chinese lab. How do we know it? Ralph S. Barci admitted himself viruses are not infectious when injected into cells. Billions would be needed to fix this problem…
3. The shots should have been stoped the moment people like you and Kevin M. Realized SARS CoV-2 was a scam… There is no redemption for people like that….
My husband received 3 CVD shots back in 2021 from the VA. He subsequently developed Parkinsons' Disease at the age of 77.
This essay pretty much seals the deal, it’s impossible to logically argue against it. That means one logical conclusion is that the conspirators organizing this tragedy were interested in raising the death rate. They had to understand what they were doing. Hopefully criminal prosecutions will come out of this research
There is so much research but no one is in jail, I keep waiting for the first arrest.
On my last doctor’s visit my physician was really pressuring me to get a tetanus shot. She has never pressured me about the Covid jab or any other vaccines before but I can’t trust what’s in any shot anymore. I won’t be getting it.
Cliff notes: vaccines are poisons.
It sounds pretty fishy to me. I am just now getting over my spring cold. At 57, historically, I usually get too cold each year. Some are worse than others.
Yes, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has extended liability protections under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act for COVID-19 countermeasures-including vaccines, treatments, and tests-through December 31, 2029[2][3][5][7]. This extension provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare providers involved in the development, administration, and use of these products. The extension aims to ensure ongoing preparedness for future COVID-19 outbreaks, even though the official public health emergency ended in May 2023, because COVID-19 still poses a credible risk of a future public health emergency[3][5][6].
Sources
[1] Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act - ASPR https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/pages/default.aspx
[2] 12th Amendment to Declaration Under the Public Readiness and ... https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/11/2024-29108/12th-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical
[3] HHS Extends PREP Act Immunity for COVID Vaccines Through 2029 https://www.americanhealthlaw.org/content-library/health-law-weekly/article/5d3aed42-9dfc-41e9-808b-0d05f423dae8/hhs-extends-prep-act-immunity-for-covid-vaccines-t
[4] The PREP Act and COVID-19, Part 2 - Congress.gov https://www.congress.gov/crs-products/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10730
[5] HHS Extends PREP Act Through 2029 - Michigan Pharmacists ... https://www.michiganpharmacists.org/news/hhs-extends-prep-act-through-2029
[6] HHS extends COVID vaccine liability protection through 2029 https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/hhs-extends-covid-vaccine-liability-protection-through-2029/
[7] HHS secretary extends duration for COVID PREP Act declaration https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/hhs-secretary-extends-duration-covid-prep-act-declaration
[8] PREP Act Question and Answers - ASPR https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/PREP-Act-Question-and-Answers.aspx
I haven't had a cold in six years. I haven't had the flu in 24 years.
Good deal. Stay healthy.
It's so obvious and so simple. If any person or company/manufacturer refuses to debate something, then they have something to hide. In this case they are hiding death, injury, malpractice, fraud and much more. So many lies and so much corruption by "vaccine" manufacturers, governments and "health" practitioners it's unbelievable. Money rules over health, safety and morals...
Thank you.