In the 1980's, all four vaccine manufacturers threatened to stop making vaccines unless the government offered them "protection" from lawsuits. I have a simple solution to the problem.
I have a solution its called Revolution. Once a government is corrupt there is no solution but to replace such.
"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." ~ John Adams
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms." ~ Thomas Jefferson
"The people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government and to reform, alter, or totally change the same when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." ~ Alexander Hamilton
"When a government betrays the people by amassing too much power and becoming tyrannical, the people have no choice but to exercise their original right of self-defense — to fight the government." ~ Alexander Hamilton
The one universal across all pharmaceutical advertising for decades has been the disclosure of a litany of every conceivable side effect.
The covid shots are the first instance where that is not the case and they are advertised as safe and effective.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if the institutions of authority acknowledged the role of the eua liability waiver as an explanation for this?
Isn’t it even more interesting that they seem incapable of even acknowledging if only to dismiss it?
The completely ignore it as the roll their eyes about conspiracy theories.
My solution: Separate healthcare and State.
Only State involvement makes liability protection a possibility.
It is not true that the State needs to moralize or regulate healthcare. State involvement is always destructive, liability protection is just an extreme case.
Absent any State involvement, we'd get health insurance, ie coverage against health hazards. Insurance is a private, for-profit business that makes money from reducing hazards.
In a free healthcare country public health policy would not exist as such, but the health insurance industry would cover the same concept. The difference: It would be actually incentivized to minimize mortality and morbidity. And it would stand between you and the pharma and medical industries, which profit from you being sick.
There is no need to impose harmony on what is harmonic to begin with (Bastiat).
For generic vaccine (un)safety I suggest a wonderful book by Amantonio. Strangely it is still not banned on Amazon. Or read this in his blog for free but in Russian :)
man Steve. This exactly. Market forces should determine the vaccine schedule up to each parents choice. If the product is good - great. If it isnt no one uses it and its off the market. Absolutely no liability protection for the pharma companies. rotten system
As they have changed the definition of a vaccine, I wonder if this is to open the door to a broader base of therapeutics that will be shielded from liability.
The vaccine manufacturers do not have to disclose the indigrenzies of their substances. Nobody knows what is contained in the vaccines (besides so-called exipiens (excipient of unknown origin) also animal DNA/RNA particles, which contaminate the vaccines by accumulation of microorganisms in animal cell cultures and later lead to xenografts during vaccination and severe late effects).
Just one example: one of the preservatives that is and has been used in vaccines is thiomersal, which contains mercury and is used to kill bacteria that could contaminate a vial. This preservative is considered safe, yet its use is being phased out. It had come under unfounded - it is claimed - suspicion of being linked to autism.
Since about 1980/90, cases of autism, autoimmune diseases, neurological diseases or cancer have literally exploded (e.g., in the USA in 1991, on average 1 child per 10,000 had autism, in 2020 already about 1 case (depending on gender) per 22 to 36 children (black boys are more severely affected)).
Obvioesly the vaccine manufacturers have a massive quality problem and no one checks their active ingredients. So, why should they invest in research for safe vaccines if they are not held liable for the health consequences.
In a nutshell!
Licencing country gets half the profits to enable proper compensation. That would be a start
I think the human race would have much better off if there had never, ever, been any vaccines at all.
Right on target.
There are liability caps on the nuclear industry as well. They too should be ended.
If nothing is mandated (and all known risks are disclosed, which they currently are not), I don’t see the justification for a lawsuit
If we can get the truth out, it's possible their overplaying their hand and murdering hundreds of thousands of people in order to profiteer from a pandemic might generate a big enough backlash to end their liability exemption.
They got immunity by killing people. Ain't Congress grand?
"If that means no vaccines are produced, I will not shed a tear." We shouldn't even get that far because there are few truly essential vaccinations, the production of which could even be nationalized. Hence, I basically agree. Among the few essentials, tetanus toxoid is one of the most safe and potent known immunogens. It is not even generally necessary to begin the course of vaccination, a couple of injections, before school age, after which you remain covered 10 years, with a precautionary booster after 5 in case of possible exposure to tetanus bacteria, case by case. Another is the diphtheria vaccine, and I'm always repeating Sucharit Bhakdi's words. My two daughters were only minimally vaccinated, the indispensable, e.g. no TB vaccine, nor against hepatitis B not being at risk, so the trade-off was against a vaccination. And my 14-month-old granddaughter won't have any until she's school age, when she'll be vaccinated with the diphtheria vaccine (for adults) and the tetanus vaccine.