86 Comments

Sad to say, most humans prefer to obey rather than to think. When you look at RFK's library, you can kind of tell that he bought each book individually, and most likely read them. Thats not true of everyone's library.

Expand full comment

Why Does Anyone care give a a rats a^^ about what Jake Tapper says? which by the way

I had never heard before! Oh wait 😮he works at CNN (Chinese News Network)🤮 which I don’t watch! Nuf said!

Expand full comment

Let's have a debate. Let's get all available info, about Covid, Fauci, Big Pharma vaccines effectiveness, supplements which strengthen the immune system, out in the open. Who wants to live with constant conflicting info about this pandemic? Not me.

Expand full comment

Tapper is pond scum.

Kennedy is solid on kill shot information

Expand full comment

Wow, RFK, Jr. certainly has more grace than I would have if some idiot posted the BS Tapper posted. BTW: I posted a comment on Tapper's account asking him to debate... and on some other idiot's account who re-tweeted Tapper and posted a crappy comment.

Expand full comment

Now Trump is out there promoting the vax....https://www.capoliticalreview.com/top-stories/trump-tells-supporters-youre-playing-right-into-their-hands-by-doubting-the-covid-19-vaccine/#comment-928847.....wonder how much $$ he has invested in the various drug companies making these dangerous cocktails

Expand full comment

No.it's his ego. He truly believes Operation Warp Speed his greatest feat. I just don't care what he thinks. But the real Trumpsters who belong and comment to these anti mandate sited are effected with cognitive dissonance.

Expand full comment

I wish someone in the news media would ask him if he would mandate the vax/boosters if he were elected President again

Expand full comment

I saw him with Bill O'Reilly speaking to an audience and they both said they got the booster. He's not who everyone hoped he was. Fraud.

Expand full comment

I read that Pfizer gave him $1 mil while he was still in office. I'm sure he's gotten more since the drug companies are covering their bases until we know who will run against Biden next time.

Expand full comment

If that can be proved....

Expand full comment

Jake Tapper would lose bigly. That's why he resorts to ad hominum methods of argument

Expand full comment

Done, I responded to his tweet

Expand full comment

We see this EVERYWHERE. As those "experts" are unable to substantiate their claims with data, they resort to personal attacks, digging up dirt on people challanging their narrative and name calling. This alone proves that you mr. Tapper, have nothing to backup the narrative you support.

As for the AP news article, apparently it is more than ok for big pharma to make BILLIONS from vaccine sales, under UNDISCOLSED non-open market purchase agreements, funded from TAXPAYERS MONEY but god forbid RFK jr receives any volunteery donations! Absolutely disgusting lack of any jurnalistic integrity these days.

Expand full comment

Hi Steve, this is a personal note to you.

We have been in back and forths with the Cornell University Provost and President regarding the legality and science of the mRNA injections and their mandates.

They are refusing to discuss the legalities but state that they are open to debating the science. We do not know if they will engage in a larger public debate on this but we are going to challenge them to do so if we get some doctors/scientists to agree to take this on.

Our next step is an attempt to get them to have a public debate w/doctors/scientists on the merits/dangers of the mRNA "vaccines."

Do you or anybody here have direct contacts with any doctors/scientists (e.g. McCullough, Malone) who would be willing/able to be involved in such a debate should Cornell agree to this.

We are looking for someone who is especially strong on the science of these injections.

Here is the most recent reply from Michael Koltikoff who is one of the primary drivers of Cornell policy:

Hi _____,

"Studies clearly show a many fold increase in antibodies following a booster and the ability of immune serum from boosted individuals to much more effectively prevent Omicron variant virus entry in cells. It is hard for me to understand how one could dismiss multiple studies showing the same effect. Moreover, our own results indicate far less frequent infection by Omicron of boosted individuals. I won’t speak to the legal issues, but I would be glad to discuss the science with you."

Mike

Expand full comment

haha - i just tweeted to Jake about his easily won debate against RFK jr. Told him his ratings would sky rocket and to put RFK jr in his place.

Expand full comment

Most excellent trolling

Expand full comment

I do not agree with RFK, Jr. on many topics. But his work on the mRNA gene therapies has been tireless and exceptional and I look to him for the truth on this every time.

Expand full comment

I’m vax injured and do agree with him on topics. The time has come for honest discussion and debate.

Expand full comment

Please tell us why you would take an experimental shot.....

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry you're vax injured. The truth has to come out. If you are familiar with Medpage Today (medical professionals' newsletter) and Dr. Vinay Prasad (whom I also disagree with frequently) you may be heartened to know that even he starting to see the light. Watch this short video from his channel and how he says, "I must be careful how I word this...." because he knows he's "poking the narrative bear".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpwSYQelMEg

Expand full comment

I’m not injured from this vax but another so why I choose not to get this one. Informed consent is so very important and why our country adopted such after WWll

Expand full comment

I submit we are ALL vax injured if our parents injected us as children.

Expand full comment

Yes, informed consent resulted from the issue of ethics and medical experimentation on people as the horrors of the Nazi doctors' testimony during the Nuremberg Trials. Whatever the vax was that injured you, you made the correct personal decision on this one. Native1, I'm putting you on my prayer list. Even if you aren't a believer, I am :-)

Expand full comment

I too am a believer. Looking forward to the return.

Expand full comment

Tapper's approach is straight from the leftist playbook: Attack and ridicule the man, while ignoring rational discourse. If Tapper does not awaken from his brain-washed stupor, he might soon start slinging even more vile slurs, like "bigot", "fascist", and "racist".

Typical of ad-hominem attacks, the perpetrator projects his own faults and insecurities onto his opponent.

Expand full comment

Yup. Ad hominem.

Expand full comment

Tapper’s Tweet seems libelous and, at least, in violation of Twitter’s policy. But we all know how Twitter rolls.

Expand full comment

I commented too.

Expand full comment

Jake's producer must be too busy molesting children to arrange this.

Expand full comment

^This

Expand full comment