The clots are real of they are not.
Why has no one with the proper pedigree in the so-called health freedom movement addressed these weird clots in a meaningful way?
Why was the first instinct of too many of t…
Why has no one with the proper pedigree in the so-called health freedom movement addressed these weird clots in a meaningful way?
Why was the first instinct of too many of the "experts" to attack Stew Peters and ignore the subject of the film?
It's binary. The clots are real or they're not.
And, if they're not real, then Ryan Cole must be lying, right? You can't avoid it.
I don't think Ryan Cole is lying.
Do you think Malone's pretty Headwinds films helped the people dying of vaxx injuries? Riding pretty horsies in Andalusia, dining al fresco, having meaningful conversations about important stuff really furthered the cause? I don't .
From Malone’s substack “There is nothing in this “Died Suddenly” which represents new news, as far as I can tell. This seems to mostly be a sensationalized but well-produced video covering information which has been known for quite some time.” And I agree. I have seen and heard many times about the strange clots found by embalmers. I have little doubt in my mind that they are indeed related to the spike proteins. His whole substack was about the importance of accuracy in presentation. He said nothing against the clots. It seems like you are angered because he has any critique about how the documentary was presented. And because he is not behaving in the way you insist he must then he is suspect?
To which article are you referring? 'Cause the word 'clot' does not appear in the article I linked.
I was a longtime paid subscriber to Malone's substack. I dropped it when the suit against the Breggins was announced. I pre-ordered his book on March 5, 2022...which I will read. I watched the Headwinds films and countless hours of his video interviews.
I have always found his tendency to pick fights with other people in the so-called movement and to accuse or imply that others are controlled opposition to be problematic. Actually, I find it bizarre. Regardless of Stew Peters underage drinking bust or his colorful past and present, he presented the clots in an in your face way. The message broke through. Malone's response was to attack the messenger and ignore the message. As I said, there was no mention of the clots in Malone's first article. None. Nada. Zip.
Malone's history and connections warrant scrutiny. I'm not looking for a leader. I have no interest in being a follower. I want true and accurate information. And I want the people who present themselves as leaders of the so-called health freedom movement to act appropriately and with humility.
Since you asked:
Malone posted about his vaccine injury on his Telegram channel in January 2022. He says he was injured after the second dose. He had the first dose in early April 2021, which means he got the second dose in late April or early May.
During that same time period, his wife wrote an article to LinkedIn (the last in a series of articles and emails, apparently) to complain that her husband, Robert, was not getting due credit for his early work on the mRNA vaxx tech. In early June, Malone and Kirsch had a three hour confab with Bret Weinstein on the DarkHorse podcast. Malone and Kirsch both discussed their reasons for getting vaccinated. Curiously, Malone neglected to mention that 'the second shot almost did him in. As in he almost died' a few weeks earlier.
Why would his wife be complaining that he didn't get credit for technology that, according to Malone himself, nearly killed him a few weeks before?
Why did it take him so long to talk about the Uracil-Pseudouridine substitution to distinguish his work from the C19 jabs? He actually wanted people to use different nomenclature for the vaxx mRNA to differentiate it from his research.
Can you make sense of the timeline? 'Cause I can't.
I read this article. Malone didn't mention the clots anywhere in it.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/sins-of-information-warfare
The clots are real of they are not.
Why has no one with the proper pedigree in the so-called health freedom movement addressed these weird clots in a meaningful way?
Why was the first instinct of too many of the "experts" to attack Stew Peters and ignore the subject of the film?
It's binary. The clots are real or they're not.
And, if they're not real, then Ryan Cole must be lying, right? You can't avoid it.
I don't think Ryan Cole is lying.
Do you think Malone's pretty Headwinds films helped the people dying of vaxx injuries? Riding pretty horsies in Andalusia, dining al fresco, having meaningful conversations about important stuff really furthered the cause? I don't .
From Malone’s substack “There is nothing in this “Died Suddenly” which represents new news, as far as I can tell. This seems to mostly be a sensationalized but well-produced video covering information which has been known for quite some time.” And I agree. I have seen and heard many times about the strange clots found by embalmers. I have little doubt in my mind that they are indeed related to the spike proteins. His whole substack was about the importance of accuracy in presentation. He said nothing against the clots. It seems like you are angered because he has any critique about how the documentary was presented. And because he is not behaving in the way you insist he must then he is suspect?
To which article are you referring? 'Cause the word 'clot' does not appear in the article I linked.
I was a longtime paid subscriber to Malone's substack. I dropped it when the suit against the Breggins was announced. I pre-ordered his book on March 5, 2022...which I will read. I watched the Headwinds films and countless hours of his video interviews.
I have always found his tendency to pick fights with other people in the so-called movement and to accuse or imply that others are controlled opposition to be problematic. Actually, I find it bizarre. Regardless of Stew Peters underage drinking bust or his colorful past and present, he presented the clots in an in your face way. The message broke through. Malone's response was to attack the messenger and ignore the message. As I said, there was no mention of the clots in Malone's first article. None. Nada. Zip.
Malone's history and connections warrant scrutiny. I'm not looking for a leader. I have no interest in being a follower. I want true and accurate information. And I want the people who present themselves as leaders of the so-called health freedom movement to act appropriately and with humility.
Since you asked:
Malone posted about his vaccine injury on his Telegram channel in January 2022. He says he was injured after the second dose. He had the first dose in early April 2021, which means he got the second dose in late April or early May.
During that same time period, his wife wrote an article to LinkedIn (the last in a series of articles and emails, apparently) to complain that her husband, Robert, was not getting due credit for his early work on the mRNA vaxx tech. In early June, Malone and Kirsch had a three hour confab with Bret Weinstein on the DarkHorse podcast. Malone and Kirsch both discussed their reasons for getting vaccinated. Curiously, Malone neglected to mention that 'the second shot almost did him in. As in he almost died' a few weeks earlier.
Why would his wife be complaining that he didn't get credit for technology that, according to Malone himself, nearly killed him a few weeks before?
Why did it take him so long to talk about the Uracil-Pseudouridine substitution to distinguish his work from the C19 jabs? He actually wanted people to use different nomenclature for the vaxx mRNA to differentiate it from his research.
Can you make sense of the timeline? 'Cause I can't.
https://t.me/RWMaloneMD/1206
It was excerpted here as well:
https://americacanwetalk.org/dr-robert-malone-the-story-of-my-vaccine-injury/
Here's an article about Dr. Jill's LinkedIn post:
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-history-of-how-mrna-vaccines/comments