The mainstream has acknowledged the jabs cause blood clots. I'm not talking about blood clots. I'm talking about the weird fibrous clots that embalmers have been pulling out of dead bodies. The clots that do not respond to anticoagulation therapy.
Ryan Cole says they are real.
To my knowledge, Malone has not said anything about them, but he attacked the guy who did.
OK and Malone has written extensively on that, but I understand if you don't want to read it. I don't read it all but frankly, all these attacks seem overblown and trivial to me. I don't care if one person says more than any other on a particular subject, I just care about the facts people present.
I was a paid subscriber to Malone's stack (until his suit against the Breggins came to light). I pre-ordered his book (which I will read). I have never read or heard Malone address the fibrous clots that embalmers have been pulling out of dead bodies...the clots that I first heard about a year and a half ago...the clots that Ryan Cole says are real...the clots that Kirsch addressed in March 2022...the clots that do not respond to anticoagulation therapy. If you have evidence that I am mistaken, provide the link and I will read it.
Stew Peters broke through. He brought attention to the weird fibrous clots. Kirsch and Cole both appear in Died Suddenly.
Malone criticized the film and Peters but did not address the clots. I know 'cause I read the article.
I don't care about Malone's feelings or sensibilities. If he felt Stew Peters wasn't the guy for the job, why didn't he do something?
I've spent enough time in the cul de sac with you, Wayne. Move on.
You don't have to convince me. I'm just saying I've heard Malone talk about clots. Is there someplace where he says there's no clots?
The mainstream has acknowledged the jabs cause blood clots. I'm not talking about blood clots. I'm talking about the weird fibrous clots that embalmers have been pulling out of dead bodies. The clots that do not respond to anticoagulation therapy.
Ryan Cole says they are real.
To my knowledge, Malone has not said anything about them, but he attacked the guy who did.
OK and Malone has written extensively on that, but I understand if you don't want to read it. I don't read it all but frankly, all these attacks seem overblown and trivial to me. I don't care if one person says more than any other on a particular subject, I just care about the facts people present.
I was a paid subscriber to Malone's stack (until his suit against the Breggins came to light). I pre-ordered his book (which I will read). I have never read or heard Malone address the fibrous clots that embalmers have been pulling out of dead bodies...the clots that I first heard about a year and a half ago...the clots that Ryan Cole says are real...the clots that Kirsch addressed in March 2022...the clots that do not respond to anticoagulation therapy. If you have evidence that I am mistaken, provide the link and I will read it.
Stew Peters broke through. He brought attention to the weird fibrous clots. Kirsch and Cole both appear in Died Suddenly.
Malone criticized the film and Peters but did not address the clots. I know 'cause I read the article.
I don't care about Malone's feelings or sensibilities. If he felt Stew Peters wasn't the guy for the job, why didn't he do something?
I've spent enough time in the cul de sac with you, Wayne. Move on.
I think what they do is divide everything up. One guy talks about one thing, but not another. It's what's called "gate-keeping," apparently.
Yes, please do.