It’s always seemed highly suspect that the FDA restricts in any way what terminal patients are allowed to take as a treatment. It’s almost as if they don’t want even anecdotal proof that nontoxic treatments that exist may work.
Look at how vilified Pauling was about IV vitamin C as a cancer treatment. Now, doctors will concede it is usef…
It’s always seemed highly suspect that the FDA restricts in any way what terminal patients are allowed to take as a treatment. It’s almost as if they don’t want even anecdotal proof that nontoxic treatments that exist may work.
Look at how vilified Pauling was about IV vitamin C as a cancer treatment. Now, doctors will concede it is useful for treating chemotherapy side effects. Who knows what is will be accepted as a treatment for in 20 more years, as people flout ‘accepted science’ to use it?
Remember when the ADA used to swear that amalgam fillings weren’t a significant source of mobile mercury, but that those same fillings were quietly phased out in favor of resin?
It’s always seemed highly suspect that the FDA restricts in any way what terminal patients are allowed to take as a treatment. It’s almost as if they don’t want even anecdotal proof that nontoxic treatments that exist may work.
Look at how vilified Pauling was about IV vitamin C as a cancer treatment. Now, doctors will concede it is useful for treating chemotherapy side effects. Who knows what is will be accepted as a treatment for in 20 more years, as people flout ‘accepted science’ to use it?
Remember when the ADA used to swear that amalgam fillings weren’t a significant source of mobile mercury, but that those same fillings were quietly phased out in favor of resin?