221 Comments
author
May 13·edited Jul 1Pinned

To let everyone know you filed a debate challenge, you must post to this pinned comment. Replies to this comment should be acceptances that qualify ONLY. All other posts will be deleted.

Expand full comment
author

you can get the t-shirt at https://supportvacsafety.myshopify.com/

Expand full comment
author

I just finished debating ChatGPT about the number of deaths and she lost. See the updated article (at the end),

Expand full comment

"Red-pilled" Rhodes Scholar Naomi Wolf still can't wrap her head around the US DOD being behind the whole thing. It MUST be the CCP!! (Paging Shasha Latipova)

https://www.brighteon.com/208d9b4d-1cf7-4ff6-8987-a7d23a734b65

Expand full comment

What amazes me is the verbiage in excess of your question that you went through to get your question answered!

Expand full comment

Steve: I read through your "chat" with Chat GPT. My observation is that Chat GPT is a typical politician that never answers a question directly, is excessively verbose, ignorant of the research, and incapable of responding without using canned language. Chat GPT is an ignorant bore and incapable of critical thought. The response also demonstrates Chat GPT restricts its sources of information and has never listened to a Dr. Arne Burkhardt lecture. Maybe that's because Chat GPT is hard of hearing (needs hearing aids, I think). Can't wait to see you debate someone with a brain. Dr.. Eric Topol of Scripts comes to mind though I would not expect much more than a Chat GPT response from him.

Expand full comment

I predict that after a couple of debates the offers will dry up. Anybody watching the first few will know they'd be taking a plastic knife to a gunfight. For the same reason you can find videos of the young Thomas Sowell humiliating liberals in debates but there are no videos of the older Sowell in debates. He challenged Julian Bond, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Barry0, Calypso Louie and other "civil rights leaders" to debate him on any topic of their choice. None ever dared. They knew better than to have their whole scam exposed.

Expand full comment

You couldn't have been more fair in setting up the parameters of this debate, since you are giving the opposing side some advantages of topic and moderator selection. Yet, in spite of this, I will be very surprised (pleasantly so) if anyone has the honesty and conviction in their personal beliefs to take up your challenge. We will see.

Expand full comment

debating progs is like herding cats..in their runt..at night..below your bedroom window

Expand full comment

Are you kidding me Steve? Do you have takers, finally?

Expand full comment

Go Steve! And BTW, thanks for your testimony at the National Citizen's Inquiry in Canada 👍💪💫🙏

Expand full comment

What changed? Why are they now all of a sudden willing to enter into debate? This is odd. Up until a day ago they ran away from it as fast as their legs could carry them.

Expand full comment

Excellent!

Next up: “Satan Klaus is Coming To Town.”

Expand full comment

Let the games begin! #mymoneysonkirsch

Expand full comment

I notice you have not required pier reviwed scientific studies to support positions. Well it will be intersting to see how your opponents support their arguments. I predict most will cite CDC recommendations or CNN "Facts" oh yeah and there's fact checker too.

Expand full comment