Now Raphael Lataster published a Substack post about how the incidence of a few cherrypicked subtypes of cancer had increased in the US in ages 0-49: https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/cancer-did-increase-alongside-covid. When I posted the following comment to his blog, he deleted my comment. He is a major hypocrite, because he complains about how he is being unfairly censored, but he does not allow free speech at his own Substack.
---
Hulscher cherrypicked types of cancer with the biggest increase since 2020. The incidence of other cancer types in ages 0-49 has been below the pre-COVID trend since 2021, like for example cancers of the thyroid, cervix, kidney, pelvis, and brain and nervous system: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047523194291040564.
The reason for the upturn in colorectal cancer after 2021 might be because insurance companies started sending home screening kits for colorectal cancer to people aged 45-49 in 2022, and there is no clear upturn in colorectal cancer incidence in ages 18-39 but only ages 40-49: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047701140951667105. SEER's online explorer doesn't provide more granular incidence data by 5-year age groups, so I cannot compare ages 45-49 against ages 40-44.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) previously recommended colorectal screening for ages 50 and above, but in May 2021 USPTF changed their guidelines to recommend screening for ages 45 and above. Under the Affordable Care Act, both Medicare and private insurance companies are required to cover USPSTF-recommended screenings with no out-of-pocket cost.
At time 31:33 Lataster said that the excess deaths in Australia "were a couple of percent". In the ABS dataset he relied on in his paper, Queensland had about 1.1% excess deaths in 2021, South Australia 0.5%, Western Australia 0.9%, and Northern Territory 6.8%. [https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australias-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic-until-december-2023#data-downloads] But out of the 4 regions he analyzed in his paper, Northern Territory has by far the smallest population size, so all 4 regions combined had only about 1.0% excess deaths in 2021.
At time 31:35 Lataster said: "Generally excess deaths in Australia has been tracking downwards, right? With better technology and such, it's gone down." But in the ABS dataset he used as his source, the whole of Australia had about -1% excess deaths in 2013, 1% in 2014, 1% in 2015, 0% in 2016, 3% in 2017, -2% in 2018, 0% in 2019, -3% in 2020, 2% in 2021, 12% in 2022, and 5% in 2023. So before COVID the excess deaths fluctuated on both sides of zero, and they weren't generally going downwards.
At time 31:50 Lataster said that excess deaths went down in 2020, which was "the year of COVID without the jab". But Australia had very little COVID deaths in 2020 thanks to the lockdowns, and the lockdowns also helped remove respiratory viruses from circulation, so there was particularly low mortality in the winter of 2020. In WHO's dataset, Australia has 920 COVID deaths on weeks ending in 2020, 1,457 in 2021, 15,439 in 2022, and 6,528 in 2023. [https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/data] So it would be more accurate to characterize 2020 as the year of lockdowns without COVID, which is problematic to people like Denis Rancourt who attribute excess deaths to stress caused by lockdowns.
At time 34:45 you asked Lataster if there were 10 extra deaths per day for the next two years after the vaccines. But he only looked at 2021 in his paper, when the 4 regions he analyzed had only about 1.8 excess deaths per day (from `((34325+16065+14406+1200)-(33964+15925+14338+1124))/365`). The 4 regions he looked at accounted for about 39% of the Australian population in 2021, so the 1.8 deaths per day is the equivalent of about 4.5 deaths per day when extrapolated to the whole Australian population.
At time 36:36 Lataster assumed that about half of excess deaths may have been due to COVID, but he said that "we know that's probably an exaggeration". However in 2022 ABS dataset he relied on had 20,022 excess deaths across the whole of Australia. And the WHO dataset has 15,439 COVID deaths in 2021, which is about 78% of the total excess deaths.
At time 36:55 you said: "I'm confused now. So you said that thousands of excess deaths - and half of the excess deaths are from COVID. Where's the other half coming from? But you said only 2% are coming from the vaccine, right? So now you're left with 50% here, 2% here, and now you have 48%. So, so clearly the vaccines are not increasing excess deaths much." Lataster said that there were a couple of percent of excess deaths, even though he should've just said 1% in case he meant the 4 regions he analyzed in his paper in 2021. And if half of 1% were COVID deaths, there would be 0.5% excess deaths from other causes.
At time 42:38 Lataster said: "Well, one of the biggest criticisms was that was that, 'Hang on, there's no statistical significance here.' And that's actually not true. So I got to show that in the commentary. I think they're using this government website that tried to downplay the excess deaths. They're showing here's all the excess deaths. And then they say, oh, but it's not statistically significant in 2021. And that's actually not true. First of all, there are, there are several weeks in the regions where it is statistically significant. So they're talking about the whole year, but there is statistically significant excess deaths to explain. Second of all, it's how they calculated it. They tend to leave out 2020, which we actually had negative excess deaths in 2020, despite having COVID without the jab. When you put that in the baseline, suddenly we've got statistical significance again." There were 2 weeks in 2021 above the 95% prediction interval in Queensland, 1 week in South Australia, 0 weeks in Western Australia, 3 weeks in Northern Territory. [https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australias-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic-until-december-2023] So that's a total of 6 weeks out of 52 times 4 combinations of week and region, which is about 2.9%, but even if you have random data, 2.5% of observations are expected to cross above the 95% interval by chance. The annual excess mortality in 2021 was nowhere close to reaching above the 95% in any of the regions. And it wouldn't make sense to include 2020 in the baseline fitting period, because 2020 was a year with exceptionally low mortality. I haven't even seen Lataster publish any regression he did himself where he included 2020 in the baseline fitting period so that he got significant excess deaths in 2021.
Those who do the 'labeling' are well known to God and they will have to answer to Him for what they have done to mislead the world to DESTROY HUMANITY! It won't work but we get to see the REWARD OF THE WICKED!
WHY would you even want to POISON your mind with FALICY? GOD IS REAL and he is about to show the entire world just how real he is. REPENT, while there is still time!
Restore accountability and justice for vaccine-injured Americans.
We, the undersigned, call on Congress to repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which grants vaccine manufacturers broad immunity from civil liability, even in cases of negligence or serious injury.
No product that is truly safe should require blanket legal immunity. Shielding manufacturers from accountability removes a fundamental incentive for rigorous safety testing and denies injured individuals their basic right to seek justice through the courts.
Americans deserve the same legal protections for vaccines that apply to other medical products. Restoring civil liability will strengthen public trust, improve safety standards, and reaffirm the principle that no corporation is above the law.
We urge Congress to act now to repeal this immunity and to restore transparency, accountability, and equal justice under the law.
You Want To Vaccinate My Child? Just Sign This Form
All vaccines are poisonous. This form is to inform you and everybody what's in vaccines. No matter what, if your doctor decide to sign, do not vaccinate your kid.
¨100% of Physicians approached with this form have so far declined to sign it.
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety Form
The following form was adapted from Ken Anderson’s original.
What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here's a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To understand more, pls visit 👇 https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/
It's rich of you two guys to say "And when they do get it wrong? No accountability. No correction. Just silence..."
In 2024 Lataster wrote a paper where he found a positive correlation between vaccination rate and excess deaths in European countries. I informed him multiple times it was because he used Eurostat's baseline which was a simple average of deaths in 2016-2019, which overestimated excess deaths in Western European countries relative to Eastern European countries: https://x.com/henjin256/status/1948569783466618890. Eurostat's baseline didn't take into account that Western European countries have a different age structure than Eastern European countries, so even before COVID, the yearly number of deaths was increasing more steeply in Western European countries than Eastern European countries. The baseline also didn't take into account that Eastern European countries had higher excess mortality due to COVID than Western European countries, so the baseline should've been lowered more in Eastern European countries to account for mortality displacement. When I used a more accurate method to calculate excess mortality, the correlation between excess mortality and vaccination rate was close to zero.
The article he cited as his source said: "Between 2000 and 2024 - in 30 to 39-year-olds - early onset prostate cancer increased by 500 per cent, pancreatic cancer by 200 per cent" (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-07/cancer-diagnosis-rates-under-50s-rising-causes-four-corners/105495620). But Lataster misleadingly didn't mention anything about how the increase was since 2000, and he gave the false impression that the increase had only occurred in the past few years or that it could be attributed to COVID vaccines.
The figures he cited were based on the "Cancer Data in Australia" dataset, which only included real incidence data up to 2020, and the incidence estimates for 2021-2024 were projections based on the trend in 2011-2020: https://x.com/henjin512/status/1955403817035727043. So the estimates were only based on data up to 2020.
The 500% increase in prostate cancer was an increase from 2 cases in 2000 to projected 11 cases in 2024, but before that there were already 16 cases in 2016: https://x.com/henjin512/status/1955403956861145254.
When I pointed out the issues to Lataster in his Substack comments, he deleted my comment. When I pointed out the issues again, he deleted my comment and blocked me. And I believe he never issued any correction to his post.
I don’t know if your criticisms are accurate but certainly one of the main problems we are dealing with is the difficulty so many of us have in admitting error. I think our whole society is too focused on competition, as opposed to cooperation, and benefits are more often bestowed on those who don’t think outside the box enough to make mistakes which they then have to correct, than on those who are smart and courageous enough to challenge certain prevailing narratives, which can easily lead to mistakes being made and then, hopefully, admitted. I think we need to question our values if we want truth rather than foolishness to prevail.
In a paper published this year, Lataster found that in 4 regions of Australia which had minimal lockdowns and few COVID deaths in 2021, the actual number of deaths in 2021 was about 1.0% higher than the baseline number of deaths predicted by ABS. He deduced that because the excess deaths could not be blamed on COVID or lockdowns, then "effectively by default, the only rational explanation is the vaccine": https://alter.systems/p/80a81ea2-6455-4f0d-a1d4-8704d5592ded.
Now Raphael Lataster published a Substack post about how the incidence of a few cherrypicked subtypes of cancer had increased in the US in ages 0-49: https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/cancer-did-increase-alongside-covid. When I posted the following comment to his blog, he deleted my comment. He is a major hypocrite, because he complains about how he is being unfairly censored, but he does not allow free speech at his own Substack.
---
Hulscher cherrypicked types of cancer with the biggest increase since 2020. The incidence of other cancer types in ages 0-49 has been below the pre-COVID trend since 2021, like for example cancers of the thyroid, cervix, kidney, pelvis, and brain and nervous system: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047523194291040564.
The red line in Hulscher's plot shows the category "Non-malignant Brain and Other Nervous System", which had a big increase between 2022 and 2023. But the category "Brain and Other Nervous System" had a decrease between 2022 and 2023, so that the incidence in 2023 was clearly below the pre-COVID trend: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=76&data_type=1&graph_type=2&compareBy=site&chk_site_500=500&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&age_range=9&stage=101&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on#resultsRegion0. SEER's guidelines say: "Beginning 1/1/2023, all cases diagnosed with pilocytic astrocytoma/juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma and new related terminology are to be reported with behavior /1. They will no longer be collected with malignant behavior (/3)." (https://seer.cancer.gov/tools/solidtumor/revisions-dec2022.html) The "behavior /1" refers to non-malignant or borderline malignant tumors. Pilocytic astrocytoma is one of the most common types of non-malignant brain tumor in ages 0-49: https://cbtrus.org/cbtrus-fact-sheet/.
The reason for the upturn in colorectal cancer after 2021 might be because insurance companies started sending home screening kits for colorectal cancer to people aged 45-49 in 2022, and there is no clear upturn in colorectal cancer incidence in ages 18-39 but only ages 40-49: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047701140951667105. SEER's online explorer doesn't provide more granular incidence data by 5-year age groups, so I cannot compare ages 45-49 against ages 40-44.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) previously recommended colorectal screening for ages 50 and above, but in May 2021 USPTF changed their guidelines to recommend screening for ages 45 and above. Under the Affordable Care Act, both Medicare and private insurance companies are required to cover USPSTF-recommended screenings with no out-of-pocket cost.
In a study that included about 10 million people aged 45-49, the screening rate for colorectal cancer approximately tripled between between 2018-2019 and 2021-2022: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2824357.
Also if you look at the overall age-standardized incidence for all cancer sites combined, there is no clear increase in the incidence above the pre-COVID trend in ages 0-19 but only ages 0-49: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=1&data_type=1&graph_type=2&compareBy=site&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&age_range=15&hdn_stage=101&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on#resultsRegion0.
At time 31:33 Lataster said that the excess deaths in Australia "were a couple of percent". In the ABS dataset he relied on in his paper, Queensland had about 1.1% excess deaths in 2021, South Australia 0.5%, Western Australia 0.9%, and Northern Territory 6.8%. [https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australias-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic-until-december-2023#data-downloads] But out of the 4 regions he analyzed in his paper, Northern Territory has by far the smallest population size, so all 4 regions combined had only about 1.0% excess deaths in 2021.
At time 31:35 Lataster said: "Generally excess deaths in Australia has been tracking downwards, right? With better technology and such, it's gone down." But in the ABS dataset he used as his source, the whole of Australia had about -1% excess deaths in 2013, 1% in 2014, 1% in 2015, 0% in 2016, 3% in 2017, -2% in 2018, 0% in 2019, -3% in 2020, 2% in 2021, 12% in 2022, and 5% in 2023. So before COVID the excess deaths fluctuated on both sides of zero, and they weren't generally going downwards.
At time 31:50 Lataster said that excess deaths went down in 2020, which was "the year of COVID without the jab". But Australia had very little COVID deaths in 2020 thanks to the lockdowns, and the lockdowns also helped remove respiratory viruses from circulation, so there was particularly low mortality in the winter of 2020. In WHO's dataset, Australia has 920 COVID deaths on weeks ending in 2020, 1,457 in 2021, 15,439 in 2022, and 6,528 in 2023. [https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/data] So it would be more accurate to characterize 2020 as the year of lockdowns without COVID, which is problematic to people like Denis Rancourt who attribute excess deaths to stress caused by lockdowns.
At time 34:45 you asked Lataster if there were 10 extra deaths per day for the next two years after the vaccines. But he only looked at 2021 in his paper, when the 4 regions he analyzed had only about 1.8 excess deaths per day (from `((34325+16065+14406+1200)-(33964+15925+14338+1124))/365`). The 4 regions he looked at accounted for about 39% of the Australian population in 2021, so the 1.8 deaths per day is the equivalent of about 4.5 deaths per day when extrapolated to the whole Australian population.
At time 36:36 Lataster assumed that about half of excess deaths may have been due to COVID, but he said that "we know that's probably an exaggeration". However in 2022 ABS dataset he relied on had 20,022 excess deaths across the whole of Australia. And the WHO dataset has 15,439 COVID deaths in 2021, which is about 78% of the total excess deaths.
At time 36:55 you said: "I'm confused now. So you said that thousands of excess deaths - and half of the excess deaths are from COVID. Where's the other half coming from? But you said only 2% are coming from the vaccine, right? So now you're left with 50% here, 2% here, and now you have 48%. So, so clearly the vaccines are not increasing excess deaths much." Lataster said that there were a couple of percent of excess deaths, even though he should've just said 1% in case he meant the 4 regions he analyzed in his paper in 2021. And if half of 1% were COVID deaths, there would be 0.5% excess deaths from other causes.
At time 42:38 Lataster said: "Well, one of the biggest criticisms was that was that, 'Hang on, there's no statistical significance here.' And that's actually not true. So I got to show that in the commentary. I think they're using this government website that tried to downplay the excess deaths. They're showing here's all the excess deaths. And then they say, oh, but it's not statistically significant in 2021. And that's actually not true. First of all, there are, there are several weeks in the regions where it is statistically significant. So they're talking about the whole year, but there is statistically significant excess deaths to explain. Second of all, it's how they calculated it. They tend to leave out 2020, which we actually had negative excess deaths in 2020, despite having COVID without the jab. When you put that in the baseline, suddenly we've got statistical significance again." There were 2 weeks in 2021 above the 95% prediction interval in Queensland, 1 week in South Australia, 0 weeks in Western Australia, 3 weeks in Northern Territory. [https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australias-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic-until-december-2023] So that's a total of 6 weeks out of 52 times 4 combinations of week and region, which is about 2.9%, but even if you have random data, 2.5% of observations are expected to cross above the 95% interval by chance. The annual excess mortality in 2021 was nowhere close to reaching above the 95% in any of the regions. And it wouldn't make sense to include 2020 in the baseline fitting period, because 2020 was a year with exceptionally low mortality. I haven't even seen Lataster publish any regression he did himself where he included 2020 in the baseline fitting period so that he got significant excess deaths in 2021.
Those who do the 'labeling' are well known to God and they will have to answer to Him for what they have done to mislead the world to DESTROY HUMANITY! It won't work but we get to see the REWARD OF THE WICKED!
God is fake and so is Jesus. Raphael Lataster wrote a whole book about how Jesus is fake: https://www.amazon.com/Questioning-Historicity-Inquiry-Philosophy-Religion/dp/9004397930. I was going to read his book, but considering the quality of his research on COVID, his book probably sucks compared to Richard Carrier's books.
Lee Strobel also set out to prove Jesus is fake but instead proved the opposite and also wrote a book. https://www.amazon.com/Case-Christ-Journalists-Personal-Investigation/dp/0310209307
WHY would you even want to POISON your mind with FALICY? GOD IS REAL and he is about to show the entire world just how real he is. REPENT, while there is still time!
Repeal the 1986 Vaccine Injury Law
Restore accountability and justice for vaccine-injured Americans.
We, the undersigned, call on Congress to repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which grants vaccine manufacturers broad immunity from civil liability, even in cases of negligence or serious injury.
No product that is truly safe should require blanket legal immunity. Shielding manufacturers from accountability removes a fundamental incentive for rigorous safety testing and denies injured individuals their basic right to seek justice through the courts.
Americans deserve the same legal protections for vaccines that apply to other medical products. Restoring civil liability will strengthen public trust, improve safety standards, and reaffirm the principle that no corporation is above the law.
We urge Congress to act now to repeal this immunity and to restore transparency, accountability, and equal justice under the law.
Sign petition:
https://www.vacsafety.org/petition-repeal-1986-law/
You Want To Vaccinate My Child? Just Sign This Form
All vaccines are poisonous. This form is to inform you and everybody what's in vaccines. No matter what, if your doctor decide to sign, do not vaccinate your kid.
¨100% of Physicians approached with this form have so far declined to sign it.
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety Form
The following form was adapted from Ken Anderson’s original.
Download PDF English
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety
http://redpillreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Warranty-of-Vaccine-Safety-English.pdf
Download PDF Espanol
Garantia Medica para la Seguridad en las Vacunas
http://redpillreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Warranty-of-Vaccine-Safety-Spanish.pdf
Download PDF Francais
Formulaire a faire signer (Vaccines)
http://redpillreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Formulaire_Vaccins.pdf
https://pharmacistben.com/health-news/want-vaccinate-child-just-sign-form/
🙏🙏
What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here's a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To understand more, pls visit 👇 https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/
It's rich of you two guys to say "And when they do get it wrong? No accountability. No correction. Just silence..."
In 2024 Lataster wrote a paper where he found a positive correlation between vaccination rate and excess deaths in European countries. I informed him multiple times it was because he used Eurostat's baseline which was a simple average of deaths in 2016-2019, which overestimated excess deaths in Western European countries relative to Eastern European countries: https://x.com/henjin256/status/1948569783466618890. Eurostat's baseline didn't take into account that Western European countries have a different age structure than Eastern European countries, so even before COVID, the yearly number of deaths was increasing more steeply in Western European countries than Eastern European countries. The baseline also didn't take into account that Eastern European countries had higher excess mortality due to COVID than Western European countries, so the baseline should've been lowered more in Eastern European countries to account for mortality displacement. When I used a more accurate method to calculate excess mortality, the correlation between excess mortality and vaccination rate was close to zero.
Jarle Aarstad's paper from 2023 had the same problem as Lataster's paper: https://sars2.net/rootclaim.html#Aarstads_correlation_between_excess_deaths_at_Eurostat_in_2022_and_percentage_of_vaccinated_people_4g. As did Fenton and Neil's "devil's advocate" post from 2022, and a paper by Peter Hegarty from 2023: https://sars2.net/rootclaim.html#Fenton_and_Neils_correlation_between_excess_deaths_and_vaccination_rate_5b, https://sars2.net/statistic2.html#Excess_mortality_in_European_countries_compared_to_percentage_of_vaccinated_people. Peter Hegarty acknowledged the problem and switched to a more accurate baseline, but Lataster did not.
---
Last year Lataster claimed that "youth cancer rates are mysteriously skyrocketing" in Australia, and he wrote that among people in their 30s, prostate cancer increased by 500% and pancreatic cancer increased by 200%: https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/youth-cancer-rates-mysteriously-skyrocket.
The article he cited as his source said: "Between 2000 and 2024 - in 30 to 39-year-olds - early onset prostate cancer increased by 500 per cent, pancreatic cancer by 200 per cent" (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-07/cancer-diagnosis-rates-under-50s-rising-causes-four-corners/105495620). But Lataster misleadingly didn't mention anything about how the increase was since 2000, and he gave the false impression that the increase had only occurred in the past few years or that it could be attributed to COVID vaccines.
The figures he cited were based on the "Cancer Data in Australia" dataset, which only included real incidence data up to 2020, and the incidence estimates for 2021-2024 were projections based on the trend in 2011-2020: https://x.com/henjin512/status/1955403817035727043. So the estimates were only based on data up to 2020.
The 500% increase in prostate cancer was an increase from 2 cases in 2000 to projected 11 cases in 2024, but before that there were already 16 cases in 2016: https://x.com/henjin512/status/1955403956861145254.
When I pointed out the issues to Lataster in his Substack comments, he deleted my comment. When I pointed out the issues again, he deleted my comment and blocked me. And I believe he never issued any correction to his post.
I don’t know if your criticisms are accurate but certainly one of the main problems we are dealing with is the difficulty so many of us have in admitting error. I think our whole society is too focused on competition, as opposed to cooperation, and benefits are more often bestowed on those who don’t think outside the box enough to make mistakes which they then have to correct, than on those who are smart and courageous enough to challenge certain prevailing narratives, which can easily lead to mistakes being made and then, hopefully, admitted. I think we need to question our values if we want truth rather than foolishness to prevail.
In a paper published this year, Lataster found that in 4 regions of Australia which had minimal lockdowns and few COVID deaths in 2021, the actual number of deaths in 2021 was about 1.0% higher than the baseline number of deaths predicted by ABS. He deduced that because the excess deaths could not be blamed on COVID or lockdowns, then "effectively by default, the only rational explanation is the vaccine": https://alter.systems/p/80a81ea2-6455-4f0d-a1d4-8704d5592ded.
However in the ABS dataset he used as his source, his 4 regions had about 1.4% excess deaths in 2015 and 1.8% excess deaths in 2017, which were both higher than the 1.0% excess deaths in 2021: https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australias-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic-until-december-2023#data-downloads. So since the excess deaths in 2015 and 2017 could not be blamed on lockdowns or COVID, were the excess deaths caused by COVID vaccines instead?
I think your readers might enjoy my op-ed today which was published on Trial Site News.
"You Don't Need To Be A Psychologist To Know This"
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/you-dont-need-to-be-a-psychologist-to-know-this-a807bedc
Here's a great blast from the past of what MSM did to us in America. If it wasn't so horrifying, it would almost be funny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI3yU5Z2adI
No One Is Safe Until Everyone Is Safe.