Fifth largest life insurance company in the US paid out 163% more for deaths of working people ages 18-64 in 2021 –Total claims/benefits up 6 billion –Company cites “non-pandemic-related morbidity” and “unusual claims adjustments” in explanation of losses from group life insurance business | 15 June 2022 | Five months after breaking the story of the CEO of One America insurance company saying deaths among working people ages 18-64 were up 40% in the third quarter of 2021, I can report that a much larger life insurance company, Lincoln National, reported a 163% increase in death benefits paid out under its group life insurance policies in 2021. This is according to the annual statements filed with state insurance departments — statements that were provided exclusively to Crossroads Report in response to public records requests. The reports show a more extreme situation than the 40% increase in deaths in the third quarter of 2021 that was cited in late December by One America CEO Scott Davison — an increase that he said was industry-wide and that he described at the time as “unheard of” and “huge, huge numbers” and the highest death rates that have ever been seen in the history of the life insurance business. The annual statements for Lincoln National Life Insurance Company show that the company paid out in death benefits under group life insurance polices a little over 500 million in 2019, about 548 million in 2020, and a stunning 1.4 billion in 2021.

Expand full comment

I think one problem with the FDA and other health agencies is that in the public comments period, the great majority of people say how much they want the vaccine available to protect their child from Covid and to protect Grandma from being infected. The majority of people have bought into the media narrative and this gives the FDA an impetus to approve the vaccines.

Expand full comment

Stop the press! Tucker Carlson of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” the No. 1-rated nightly news show in North America, just spent the first 15 minutes of tonight’s program eviscerating Anthony Fauci. He also harpooned many of the faux Covid narratives. Basically, he made many of the points posters here have been making for 26 months. His first guest was an author who had written a book about Fauci and his guest tore into Fauci and the hellacious Covid responses even more forcefully than Tucker.

Why is this significant? Because as far as I am aware, this is the first major U.S. TV news network that has so aggressively taken on Fauci and the entire Covid medical cartel. In other words, this is a major departure. It’s like Carlson said, “The hell with it. I’m going to say what I really think.” And, unless he is fired or apologizes tomorrow, I guess his bosses let him – which is big news in itself.

Someone might want to go to the Fox News website or Tucker’s own website and see if this clip is saved. I think if you watch it, your jaw will also drop.

Expand full comment

Eureka! Here's an idea: Some civic-minded billionaire (maybe Musk? Maybe Steve or his wealthy friends?) can start an investment fund to award big thank-you grants to whistle-blowers who spill the beans on the Bad People and Bad Organizations. Instead of Genuis Grants or Academic Chairs we'd have Whisteblower Grants.

This would hopefully incentive thousands of narrative-changing whisteblowers to come forward. Yes, they may bet fired and be cancelled, but they would live handsomely thanks to their courage and the example they set for others. We could also start a Hall of Fame for these people. We can put it in my hometown of Troy, Alabama. I know the mayor.

... Now we'd also need another wealthy philanthropist or investment fund to start a news organization that reaches a lot of people to actually publish the claims of these whisteblowers, but maybe that could happen too.

We're all looking for "solutions," someone needs to think out of the box here. I know this. Nothing is going to change until we have a sh**-load of whistleblowers.

Expand full comment
Jun 16, 2022·edited Jun 16, 2022

Perhaps the FDA psychos justification for shot approval for kids is so the kids will die suddenly and thus FDA thinks their death is compassionate & humane without experiencing their parents deaths or their own starvation. FDA approval is unjustifiable without some outlandish explanations. Did States pay for the kids shots ? Incentivized? Are the kids shots free courtesy of fed gov?


Expand full comment

You Wanted to "Do Something"? Now You Can! WE HAVE 12 HOURS!!! (Please Share this)

The White House and #CDC just ambushed us with a Sneak Vax Approval Meeting TOMORROW for LITTLE KIDS. This is already banned in multiple European countries but corrupt pharma badger just don't care!

Toby Rogers (who Steve Kirsch recently interviewed) explains and gives you a brilliant 2-minute solution for making a difference in the next 24 hours if you scroll to bottom of this post. https://jimychanga.substack.com/p/you-wanted-to-do-something-now-you?s=w

Expand full comment

Looking forward to this great line-up because the Epoch Times ATL interview with McCullough and Leake was one of the best ever. You've got competition tonight though Steve, b/c ATL is premiering the interview with Mattias Desmet at 7:30 EDT!! Posobiec will be great too, so you win over ATL b/c I can watch that later.

Expand full comment

Why hide your phone? Maybe you should tell people why before the video, not after, because many people use their phones to view their emails and watch the videos. Guess I'm gonna miss this one. Darn!👵😇

Expand full comment

Signed and shared! Thanks Steve... Your airtable is sweet, you should like it to mine, mine is the bomb! https://airtable.com/appny7iwBVHul2w4F/tblMiIv7fUu3s3iea/viwbleljzwqyFNqjw?blocks=hide "Int'l Coalition for Open-Source Pharmacovigilance"

Expand full comment

Excellent comments from Sam Dodson open hearing to FDA on the clot shots:


Expand full comment

I'm building a list of "red pill" Wuhan Virus books. If anyone can add to my list so far, please reply.

The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, by Peter McCullough, M.D., M.P.H. and John Leake.

The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, Covid-19 and the War Against the Human, by Naomi Wolf.

Overcoming the COVID Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients, by Brian Tyson, George Fareed & Mathew Crawford.

The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Truth About Masks: Exploring Theories Against Wearing Them, by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively.

A Plague Upon Our House: My Fight at the Trump White House to Stop COVID from Destroying America, by Scott W. Atlas M.D.

Case Against Vaccine Mandates, by Kent Heckenlively.

Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines, by Colleen Huber.

The Defeat of COVID: 500+ medical studies show what works & what doesn't, by Colleen Huber.

COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey by, Peter Roger Breggin & Ginger Ross Breggin.

Expand full comment
Jun 16, 2022·edited Jun 16, 2022

Damn Steve Kirsch Peter McCullough and Jack Poso? I want an invite irl

Expand full comment

If possible, please ask Dr. McCullough if he sees any evidence of an increase in people being diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The reason for the question is that according to the February 2021 article entitled:

COVID-19 patients may become predisposed to pulmonary arterial hypertension. February 2021


"Our histological evaluations revealed that patients died of COVID-19 exhibited thickened pulmonary vascular walls, one important hallmark of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We herein hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 is another virus that is capable to triggering the increased susceptibility of infected individuals to developing PAH in the future."

It seems plausible that spike proteins resulting from the inoculations may cause a similar vascular remodeling leading to PAH.

Some sources report that it takes about one year from time of first symptoms to finally receive a diagnosis of PAH due to the sequence of specialists and tests required. “Timely identification of disease progression may prompt physicians to initiate earlier intervention in order to prevent the otherwise inevitable deterioration of right heart function. However, detecting early disease progression is a complex task presenting various challenges mainly because the pathophysiological changes that occur during the initial stages of the disease are generally not detectable” - https://err.ersjournals.com/content/21/123/40


From what I read online, The median survival [from time of diagnosis] for someone with PAH used to be 2.5 years, but now with medications, it can be longer.

Should I be worried about PAH becoming a more significant health outcome in the next several years?

Thank you for your time and effort to helping inform those of us who are interested in what we may expect in the future.

Expand full comment

Steve TY! I pray for the end of this treacherous injection agenda along with the end of all the other evil agendas so that honest, qualified, caring doctors can freely promote proven, effective remedies all over the world! Our God is much Bigger than Big Pharma and His plans will prevail. Very soon, in Jesus' name I pray! Amen!

Expand full comment