I had an idea. Was watching Dark waters. I thought, Now Steve Kirsch, he needs to talk to Mark Ruffalo, and Tim Robbins. And take them through the vaccine side effects. Keep their eyes open. And then if it's not like C8 and what they can relate to in their film Dark waters. Walk away. But otherwise challenge them to bring this to America and the world. The whole cast. Maybe even crew. Because they will reach who we don't.
hmmm I actually met Mark Ruffalo twice and he owns one of my paintings...Get me in touch with him and maybe I can make some headway with him as he is a rather reasonable guy.
It was EPIC all around. Atop tremendous speakers, musicians and crowd - I got a hug from you, my ethical hero! And due to my bizarre facial recognition ability + impulsivity, I had a bunch of sweet encounters with people I recognized &/or actually know. Btw, does Dr. Ealy palpably transmit electricity through his hands? Sure felt like it.
Steve, thank you also for your summary of the conference you and your people had with Ardis. I don't mean to snark (much), but if Ardis didn't want to "alarm" the public, Ardis shouldn't have done the high-emotion-but-no-hard-data presentation on Stew Peters. I'm very annoyed with Mike Adams exploiting the story, as is his style, on all his platforms. Adams' style is short on citing source documents, and any links only go to his other articles. While Ardis rightly is against the deadly jabs, I don't think he is helping with these claims. He interviewed Dr. Zelenko a while back but was so consumed with his theory he didn't hear one word Dr Z said. Huge cringe factors. There's no reasonable basis no matter how stretched for the "venom in the water" claims and Ardis - and I note many, many newly zealous followers - will not absorb that swallowed venom is not toxic. He doesn't want to adjust his theory; he doesn't want to do the necessary hours of research. Like several others I've seen who get personal mileage with various claims that get past filters on tour with those who are trying to save lives, to be hooked on his own dopamine rushes and creating notoriety. I want to cry in frustration sometimes because I can't give those people a whomp upside their heads.
Dr. Ardis was the first one I really learned about remdisivir from, so I hate for him to lose credibility. It makes you wonder if someone is playing him for that very reason. I have always been a little skeptical of some information on Stew’s show, but I pay attention just in case. He’s one of those people that gets so excited about things that he goes all in no matter how bizarre something sound. We are living in bizarro world, though, so …
You make excellent point about Stew - he does get excited and goes all in. He is also mostly very good about not dominating an interview, I haven't felt like yelling at my screen for him to "Shaddup!" I have heard about things for the first time on his shows, too. I heard about remdesivir first in 2014 when it was being employed in Africa against Ebola. It was created mostly by Baric. I got very concerned things were getting to Stew when he went off rabid about Grenell with no evidence and irrationally without any facts or logic connected him to child trafficking and Molech. Disturbing was the echoed rabidity in the comments. It was bizarre. As a Public Defender I'd represented clients in involuntary detention proceedings to commit them to the state hospital that sounded just like Stew did. A few weeks ago, Stew went off again, I forget the trigger. I hoped he was seeing or would see someone for meds and someone for some cognitive behavioral therapy. No shame in that! Th election and Covid has put Stew on the map, and he probably has a livable income. Before that, I'd get upset at him for stretching the truth, or taking it 2 steps too far. He's got a steady diet in his work of the world gone mad. I remember him talking a bit with a guest how it used to be a neighbor knew someone who knew someone that died from the jab, then knew someone who died, then a neighbor Stew knew was injured or died, then his wife's close relative, then someone he knew at church... it got too close, too real and in his and our front yards. Yes, we are living in Bizarro world! We had a decent illusion that for the most part, we lived in a country where things made sense most of the time and we could expect consistent behavior from institutions, communities, the courts, and we could effect positive change if things went awry. Oops. I'm still questioning my assumptions and assessments. So much evil confidently flaunting itself, and people sheeping out!
Let's look at the death data for those ≥80 years of age, from week 3 (the fraud) onwards:
-----------------------------------------
Period A B C (deaths per 100,000)
-----------------------------------------
week03 039 309 270
week04 057 322 265
week05 078 326 248
week06 103 324 221
week07 114 280 165
week08 120 243 124
week09 120 190 070
week10 110 152 042
week11 101 141 040
week12 090 134 044
week13 084 122 037
Column A is deaths among those "suitably triple jabbed" per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A
-----------------------------------------
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide a plausible excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
Graphene nano-antennae to create biological nano-networks? To prepare us for the glorious future of mrna vaccines and gene-editing, they slipped it into the "vaccines" (peer-reviewed papers; they've been working on it a while):
I was there and it was wall to wall people. Could hardlyt find a space to sit or stand. I was very inspiring and uplifting meeting all the like minded people. At times it was a little warm but the cool breeze helped.
Thank you to all of these speakers! The DTM rally was humbling, inspiring, heartbreaking, and amazing. The best part about it was physically coming together with 25,000+ people to fight for medical freedom. Such crap that media reported only a few hundred people! It gives me hope to see a journalist like Lara Logan on the right side of this, seeking the truth and speaking out. It was great to hear Michael Huang, so now we know who that one person was. Stayed to the end and saw Hi Rez's proposal. Did she say "yes"?
I wrote this already in another post: It was worth going, just to see you speak, Steve. Thank you for always showing up to fight for this cause and spreading the truth. You make going off script look easy. You are a very gifted and powerful communicator, full of passion and compassion. You are a force they never expected. Steve Rocks!
On Twitter she was also pro Transgender and therefore effectively anti-woman. And Twitter's main censorship before Vaxx was on transgender. If you were pro transgender you could do anything, including threatening to kill. If you were pro-woman you were shut down, threatened without recourse and gaslit from here to kingdom come.
I have a question for today's call that I want to submit but can't quite figure out where to submit it. I'd like to know, what do you think is the best way to answer people when they give you the "correlation does not equal causation" line? If you or someone could please let me know where I should be submitting these questions, I'd appreciate it. Thanks!
you tell them they are RIGHT, it doesn't. THEN you ask them, ok, so if it wasn't the vaccine, then WHAT caused the EXCESS deaths over baseline? Then you start recording their reaction on video and send it to me :)
Yeah, sometimes Quora can be frustrating, a lot of Vaccine pushers on there, but now you can see a flood of them are starting to turn around, questioning the safety of the vaccines they got injected with. The scientific questions I really want answered sometimes have gone completely ignored, even after I've requested answers from over 75 scientists.
Maybe this is the only reasonable answer? : from the site towardsdatasciencedotcom:
" Indeed, correlation does not imply causation. Whenever we see a relationship between two variables, it's wise to be conservative and assume that the relationship is correlational rather than causal. However, this doesn't mean that correlations are useless."
Hundreds in attendance my ass! The place was crawling with attendees from all over the country. We drove from the Bay Area. It was a great event. Looking forward to today's call.
Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load
For the last two years, we’ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.19
As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.20 There has never been a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.
Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800.
I had an idea. Was watching Dark waters. I thought, Now Steve Kirsch, he needs to talk to Mark Ruffalo, and Tim Robbins. And take them through the vaccine side effects. Keep their eyes open. And then if it's not like C8 and what they can relate to in their film Dark waters. Walk away. But otherwise challenge them to bring this to America and the world. The whole cast. Maybe even crew. Because they will reach who we don't.
hmmm I actually met Mark Ruffalo twice and he owns one of my paintings...Get me in touch with him and maybe I can make some headway with him as he is a rather reasonable guy.
I can't find an official source for the LAPD crowd-size estimate. Anyone have more success?
It was EPIC all around. Atop tremendous speakers, musicians and crowd - I got a hug from you, my ethical hero! And due to my bizarre facial recognition ability + impulsivity, I had a bunch of sweet encounters with people I recognized &/or actually know. Btw, does Dr. Ealy palpably transmit electricity through his hands? Sure felt like it.
Steve, thank you also for your summary of the conference you and your people had with Ardis. I don't mean to snark (much), but if Ardis didn't want to "alarm" the public, Ardis shouldn't have done the high-emotion-but-no-hard-data presentation on Stew Peters. I'm very annoyed with Mike Adams exploiting the story, as is his style, on all his platforms. Adams' style is short on citing source documents, and any links only go to his other articles. While Ardis rightly is against the deadly jabs, I don't think he is helping with these claims. He interviewed Dr. Zelenko a while back but was so consumed with his theory he didn't hear one word Dr Z said. Huge cringe factors. There's no reasonable basis no matter how stretched for the "venom in the water" claims and Ardis - and I note many, many newly zealous followers - will not absorb that swallowed venom is not toxic. He doesn't want to adjust his theory; he doesn't want to do the necessary hours of research. Like several others I've seen who get personal mileage with various claims that get past filters on tour with those who are trying to save lives, to be hooked on his own dopamine rushes and creating notoriety. I want to cry in frustration sometimes because I can't give those people a whomp upside their heads.
Dr. Ardis was the first one I really learned about remdisivir from, so I hate for him to lose credibility. It makes you wonder if someone is playing him for that very reason. I have always been a little skeptical of some information on Stew’s show, but I pay attention just in case. He’s one of those people that gets so excited about things that he goes all in no matter how bizarre something sound. We are living in bizarro world, though, so …
You make excellent point about Stew - he does get excited and goes all in. He is also mostly very good about not dominating an interview, I haven't felt like yelling at my screen for him to "Shaddup!" I have heard about things for the first time on his shows, too. I heard about remdesivir first in 2014 when it was being employed in Africa against Ebola. It was created mostly by Baric. I got very concerned things were getting to Stew when he went off rabid about Grenell with no evidence and irrationally without any facts or logic connected him to child trafficking and Molech. Disturbing was the echoed rabidity in the comments. It was bizarre. As a Public Defender I'd represented clients in involuntary detention proceedings to commit them to the state hospital that sounded just like Stew did. A few weeks ago, Stew went off again, I forget the trigger. I hoped he was seeing or would see someone for meds and someone for some cognitive behavioral therapy. No shame in that! Th election and Covid has put Stew on the map, and he probably has a livable income. Before that, I'd get upset at him for stretching the truth, or taking it 2 steps too far. He's got a steady diet in his work of the world gone mad. I remember him talking a bit with a guest how it used to be a neighbor knew someone who knew someone that died from the jab, then knew someone who died, then a neighbor Stew knew was injured or died, then his wife's close relative, then someone he knew at church... it got too close, too real and in his and our front yards. Yes, we are living in Bizarro world! We had a decent illusion that for the most part, we lived in a country where things made sense most of the time and we could expect consistent behavior from institutions, communities, the courts, and we could effect positive change if things went awry. Oops. I'm still questioning my assumptions and assessments. So much evil confidently flaunting itself, and people sheeping out!
Now THESE people are worth talking to. Why chase pharma shills down? We already KNOW they are LIARS.
THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE MANDATES!!!
PROOF THAT THE "VACCINES" INCREASE SICKNESS AND DEATH.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 4 OR 5 WEEKS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184
Let's look at the death data for those ≥80 years of age, from week 3 (the fraud) onwards:
-----------------------------------------
Period A B C (deaths per 100,000)
-----------------------------------------
week03 039 309 270
week04 057 322 265
week05 078 326 248
week06 103 324 221
week07 114 280 165
week08 120 243 124
week09 120 190 070
week10 110 152 042
week11 101 141 040
week12 090 134 044
week13 084 122 037
Column A is deaths among those "suitably triple jabbed" per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A
-----------------------------------------
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide a plausible excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
Graphene nano-antennae to create biological nano-networks? To prepare us for the glorious future of mrna vaccines and gene-editing, they slipped it into the "vaccines" (peer-reviewed papers; they've been working on it a while):
https://lilianeheldkhawam-com.translate.goog/2021/12/16/co-ro-na-pour-systeme-de-coordonnees-et-de-routage-pour-les-nanoreseaux/?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Is it in the Chinese vaxes too, or are the Chinese supposed to be spared?
Yeah, or fry people's brains.
Thank you, Steve,! I've book marked the websites of your guests, made donations.
Now we are seeing more solutions and actions to enlighten Brava bravo
Considering Naomi is there and that we all know of her 'progressive' credentials are we going to be using pronouns?
I was there and it was wall to wall people. Could hardlyt find a space to sit or stand. I was very inspiring and uplifting meeting all the like minded people. At times it was a little warm but the cool breeze helped.
Thank you to all of these speakers! The DTM rally was humbling, inspiring, heartbreaking, and amazing. The best part about it was physically coming together with 25,000+ people to fight for medical freedom. Such crap that media reported only a few hundred people! It gives me hope to see a journalist like Lara Logan on the right side of this, seeking the truth and speaking out. It was great to hear Michael Huang, so now we know who that one person was. Stayed to the end and saw Hi Rez's proposal. Did she say "yes"?
I wrote this already in another post: It was worth going, just to see you speak, Steve. Thank you for always showing up to fight for this cause and spreading the truth. You make going off script look easy. You are a very gifted and powerful communicator, full of passion and compassion. You are a force they never expected. Steve Rocks!
thanks! yes, she accepted the marriage proposal!
Yay, that's awesome! Now they need to invite all of the DTMers to their wedding :)
The left just could not live with Naomi Wolfe being anti-vax and anti-censorship. Having her as an ally was one of my best experience on Twitter.
On Twitter she was also pro Transgender and therefore effectively anti-woman. And Twitter's main censorship before Vaxx was on transgender. If you were pro transgender you could do anything, including threatening to kill. If you were pro-woman you were shut down, threatened without recourse and gaslit from here to kingdom come.
I don't trust her one little bit.
I pray she's having epiphanies on that, too.
I have a question for today's call that I want to submit but can't quite figure out where to submit it. I'd like to know, what do you think is the best way to answer people when they give you the "correlation does not equal causation" line? If you or someone could please let me know where I should be submitting these questions, I'd appreciate it. Thanks!
you tell them they are RIGHT, it doesn't. THEN you ask them, ok, so if it wasn't the vaccine, then WHAT caused the EXCESS deaths over baseline? Then you start recording their reaction on video and send it to me :)
Haha! That's perfect! Just what I needed, thanks Steve!
NIH admits that, after the FIRST shot, 12% of health care workers missed work, 2.5% needed a doctor's visit and almost 1% went to the ER or hospital.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049195/
Jessica Rose covers this based on the WHO's Bradford Hill criteria.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/causation-prove-me-wrong?s=r
https://www.theepochtimes.com/numerous-health-problems-more-likely-due-to-covid-19-vaccines-than-coincidence-vaers-data-analysis_4380017.html?welcomeuser=1
Oh, duh.... sorry I just saw, it says this on the Zoom call confirmation:
"Please submit any questions to: vacsafety@protonmail.com." Will do!
maybe Quora? some of their answers don't resonate with me though
Yeah, sometimes Quora can be frustrating, a lot of Vaccine pushers on there, but now you can see a flood of them are starting to turn around, questioning the safety of the vaccines they got injected with. The scientific questions I really want answered sometimes have gone completely ignored, even after I've requested answers from over 75 scientists.
Maybe this is the only reasonable answer? : from the site towardsdatasciencedotcom:
" Indeed, correlation does not imply causation. Whenever we see a relationship between two variables, it's wise to be conservative and assume that the relationship is correlational rather than causal. However, this doesn't mean that correlations are useless."
Thanks, Sharon! I would also love to hear how one of Steve's physican friends answers this, but I will definitely save your answer!!
Hundreds in attendance my ass! The place was crawling with attendees from all over the country. We drove from the Bay Area. It was a great event. Looking forward to today's call.
25,000 i heard. thanks for coming.
No prob! Went to the one in DC, too, it was epic.
From Dr. Mercolas blog today:
Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load
For the last two years, we’ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.19
As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.20 There has never been a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.
Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800.